tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 75c81bcddd82381fbd4cef477a5b56eb2fe56697 commit: 44391f3171b05060096ff496f3507033f2460161 [1834/1834] memcg: Add sysctl memcg_qos_enable config: x86_64-randconfig-121-20250122 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250122/202501220758.6wiUFGfn-lkp@i...) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250122/202501220758.6wiUFGfn-lkp@i...) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501220758.6wiUFGfn-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

...

mm/memcontrol.c:4061:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sysctl_memcg_oom_prio' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/memcontrol.c:4223:50: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@ mm/memcontrol.c:4223:50: sparse: expected void * mm/memcontrol.c:4223:50: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer mm/memcontrol.c:4245:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (incompatible argument 3 (different address spaces)) @@ expected int ( [usertype] *proc_handler )( ... ) @@ got int ( * )( ... ) @@ mm/memcontrol.c:4245:35: sparse: expected int ( [usertype] *proc_handler )( ... ) mm/memcontrol.c:4245:35: sparse: got int ( * )( ... ) mm/memcontrol.c:4504:21: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:4504:21: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:4504:21: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary * mm/memcontrol.c:4506:21: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:4506:21: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:4506:21: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary * mm/memcontrol.c:4662:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:4662:9: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:4662:9: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary * mm/memcontrol.c:4756:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:4756:9: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:4756:9: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary * mm/memcontrol.c:6799:23: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:6799:23: sparse: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:6799:23: sparse: struct task_struct * mm/memcontrol.c:7016:52: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:7016:52: sparse: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:7016:52: sparse: struct task_struct * mm/memcontrol.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/rculist.h, include/linux/pid.h, include/linux/sched.h, ...): include/linux/list.h:83:21: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to true mm/memcontrol.c: note: in included file: include/linux/memcontrol.h:782:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock' - wrong count at exit include/linux/memcontrol.h:782:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock_irq' - wrong count at exit include/linux/memcontrol.h:782:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave' - wrong count at exit mm/memcontrol.c:2134:6: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'folio_memcg_lock' - wrong count at exit mm/memcontrol.c:2181:17: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in '__folio_memcg_unlock' - unexpected unlock mm/memcontrol.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/rculist.h, include/linux/pid.h, include/linux/sched.h, ...): include/linux/list.h:83:21: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to true include/linux/list.h:83:21: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to true mm/memcontrol.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/rculist.h, include/linux/pid.h, include/linux/sched.h, ...): include/linux/rcupdate.h:780:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'mem_cgroup_count_precharge_pte_range' - unexpected unlock include/linux/rcupdate.h:780:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range' - unexpected unlock

vim +/sysctl_memcg_oom_prio +4061 mm/memcontrol.c 4057 4058 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY 4059 #define ENABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY 1 4060 #define DISABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY 0

4061 int sysctl_memcg_oom_prio = DISABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY; 4062 4063 bool memcg_oom_prio_disabled(void) 4064 { 4065 return READ_ONCE(sysctl_memcg_oom_prio) == DISABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY; 4066 } 4067 4068 static void memcg_oom_prio_init(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) 4069 { 4070 struct mem_cgroup *parent = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg); 4071 int oom_prio; 4072 4073 if (!parent) 4074 return; 4075 4076 oom_prio = READ_ONCE(parent->oom_prio); 4077 WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_prio, oom_prio); 4078 } 4079 4080 static s64 memcg_oom_prio_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, 4081 struct cftype *cft) 4082 { 4083 struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); 4084 4085 if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) 4086 return 0; 4087 4088 return READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_prio); 4089 } 4090 4091 static int memcg_oom_prio_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, 4092 struct cftype *cft, s64 val) 4093 { 4094 struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); 4095 struct mem_cgroup *iter_memcg; 4096 struct cgroup_subsys_state *iter_css; 4097 4098 if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) 4099 return -EACCES; 4100 4101 if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) 4102 return -EINVAL; 4103 4104 if (val != MEMCG_LOW_OOM_PRIORITY && val != MEMCG_HIGH_OOM_PRIORITY) 4105 return -EINVAL; 4106 4107 rcu_read_lock(); 4108 css_for_each_descendant_pre(iter_css, &memcg->css) { 4109 iter_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(iter_css); 4110 4111 WRITE_ONCE(iter_memcg->oom_prio, val); 4112 } 4113 rcu_read_unlock(); 4114 4115 return 0; 4116 } 4117 4118 static struct mem_cgroup *memcg_find_max_usage(struct mem_cgroup *last) 4119 { 4120 struct mem_cgroup *iter, *max_memcg = NULL; 4121 struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; 4122 unsigned long usage, max_usage = 0; 4123 int oom_prio; 4124 4125 rcu_read_lock(); 4126 css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &root_mem_cgroup->css) { 4127 iter = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); 4128 oom_prio = READ_ONCE(iter->oom_prio); 4129 4130 if (oom_prio == MEMCG_HIGH_OOM_PRIORITY || 4131 iter == root_mem_cgroup || 4132 iter == last) 4133 continue; 4134 4135 usage = mem_cgroup_usage(iter, false); 4136 if (usage > max_usage) { 4137 max_usage = usage; 4138 max_memcg = iter; 4139 } 4140 } 4141 rcu_read_unlock(); 4142 4143 return max_memcg; 4144 } 4145 4146 bool memcg_oom_prio_scan_tasks(int (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), 4147 void *arg) 4148 { 4149 struct mem_cgroup *max, *last = NULL; 4150 struct oom_control *oc = arg; 4151 struct css_task_iter it; 4152 struct task_struct *task; 4153 int ret = 0; 4154 bool retry = true; 4155 4156 if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) 4157 return false; 4158 retry: 4159 max = memcg_find_max_usage(last); 4160 if (!max) 4161 return false; 4162 4163 css_task_iter_start(&max->css, 0, &it); 4164 while (!ret && (task = css_task_iter_next(&it))) { 4165 if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE)) 4166 continue; 4167 4168 ret = fn(task, arg); 4169 } 4170 css_task_iter_end(&it); 4171 4172 if (ret) 4173 return false; 4174 4175 if (!oc->chosen && retry) { 4176 last = max; 4177 retry = false; 4178 goto retry; 4179 } 4180 4181 if (oc->chosen) 4182 pr_info("The bad task [%d:%s] is from low-priority memcg.\n", 4183 oc->chosen->pid, oc->chosen->comm); 4184 4185 return oc->chosen ? true : false; 4186 } 4187 4188 void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc) 4189 { 4190 if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) 4191 return; 4192 4193 if (oc->chosen) { 4194 struct mem_cgroup *memcg; 4195 4196 rcu_read_lock(); 4197 memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(oc->chosen); 4198 if (READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_prio) == MEMCG_LOW_OOM_PRIORITY) 4199 pr_info("The bad task [%d:%s] is from low-priority memcg.\n", 4200 oc->chosen->pid, oc->chosen->comm); 4201 rcu_read_unlock(); 4202 } 4203 } 4204 4205 static void memcg_oom_prio_reset(void) 4206 { 4207 struct mem_cgroup *iter; 4208 struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; 4209 4210 rcu_read_lock(); 4211 css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &root_mem_cgroup->css) { 4212 iter = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); 4213 WRITE_ONCE(iter->oom_prio, 0); 4214 } 4215 rcu_read_unlock(); 4216 } 4217 4218 static int sysctl_memcg_oom_prio_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, 4219 void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos) 4220 { 4221 int ret; 4222 4223 ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); 4224 if (ret) 4225 return ret; 4226 4227 if (write) { 4228 if (READ_ONCE(sysctl_memcg_oom_prio) == DISABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY) 4229 memcg_oom_prio_reset(); 4230 } 4231 4232 return ret; 4233 } 4234 4235 static struct ctl_table memcg_oom_prio_sysctls[] = { 4236 { 4237 /* 4238 * This sysctl is used to control memcg oom priority 4239 * feature, the sysctl name is for compatibility. 4240 */ 4241 .procname = "memcg_qos_enable", 4242 .data = &sysctl_memcg_oom_prio, 4243 .maxlen = sizeof(int), 4244 .mode = 0644, 4245 .proc_handler = sysctl_memcg_oom_prio_handler, 4246 .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, 4247 .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE, 4248 }, 4249 }; 4250

-- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki