From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.210 commit f199018dc762dfa501f6d96a424468a0f3c10d9e category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I98RJ4 CVE: CVE-2024-26624 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 4d322dce82a1d44f8c83f0f54f95dd1b8dcf46c9 ] syzbot reported a lockdep splat [1]. Blamed commit hinted about the possible lockdep violation, and code used unix_state_lock_nested() in an attempt to silence lockdep. It is not sufficient, because unix_state_lock_nested() is already used from unix_state_double_lock(). We need to use a separate subclass. This patch adds a distinct enumeration to make things more explicit. Also use swap() in unix_state_double_lock() as a clean up. v2: add a missing inline keyword to unix_state_lock_nested() [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00356-g8a696a29c690 #0 Not tainted syz-executor.1/2542 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88808b5df9e8 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: skb_queue_tail+0x36/0x120 net/core/skbuff.c:3863 but task is already holding lock: ffff88808b5dfe70 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: unix_dgram_sendmsg+0xfc7/0x2200 net/unix/af_unix.c:2089 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:378 sk_diag_dump_icons net/unix/diag.c:87 [inline] sk_diag_fill+0x6ea/0xfe0 net/unix/diag.c:157 sk_diag_dump net/unix/diag.c:196 [inline] unix_diag_dump+0x3e9/0x630 net/unix/diag.c:220 netlink_dump+0x5c1/0xcd0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2264 __netlink_dump_start+0x5d7/0x780 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2370 netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:338 [inline] unix_diag_handler_dump+0x1c3/0x8f0 net/unix/diag.c:319 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0xe3/0x400 netlink_rcv_skb+0x1df/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2543 sock_diag_rcv+0x2a/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:280 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1341 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x7e6/0x980 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1367 netlink_sendmsg+0xa37/0xd70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1908 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] sock_write_iter+0x39a/0x520 net/socket.c:1160 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2085 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xa74/0xca0 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b -> #0 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x1909/0x5ab0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 skb_queue_tail+0x36/0x120 net/core/skbuff.c:3863 unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x15d9/0x2200 net/unix/af_unix.c:2112 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x592/0x890 net/socket.c:2584 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x730 net/socket.c:2724 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2753 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2750 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2750 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&u->lock/1); lock(rlock-AF_UNIX); lock(&u->lock/1); lock(rlock-AF_UNIX); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.1/2542: #0: ffff88808b5dfe70 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: unix_dgram_sendmsg+0xfc7/0x2200 net/unix/af_unix.c:2089 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 2542 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00356-g8a696a29c690 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/17/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x366/0x490 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x1909/0x5ab0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 skb_queue_tail+0x36/0x120 net/core/skbuff.c:3863 unix_dgram_sendmsg+0x15d9/0x2200 net/unix/af_unix.c:2112 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x592/0x890 net/socket.c:2584 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x730 net/socket.c:2724 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2753 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2750 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2750 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7f26d887cda9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f26d95a60c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f26d89abf80 RCX: 00007f26d887cda9 RDX: 000000000000003e RSI: 00000000200bd000 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f26d88c947a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000008c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f26d89abf80 R15: 00007ffcfe081a68 Fixes: 2aac7a2cb0d9 ("unix_diag: Pending connections IDs NLA") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240130184235.1620738-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com> --- include/net/af_unix.h | 20 ++++++++++++++------ net/unix/af_unix.c | 14 ++++++-------- net/unix/diag.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h index ae41d8ee970a..94113c2090a8 100644 --- a/include/net/af_unix.h +++ b/include/net/af_unix.h @@ -47,12 +47,6 @@ struct scm_stat { #define UNIXCB(skb) (*(struct unix_skb_parms *)&((skb)->cb)) -#define unix_state_lock(s) spin_lock(&unix_sk(s)->lock) -#define unix_state_unlock(s) spin_unlock(&unix_sk(s)->lock) -#define unix_state_lock_nested(s) \ - spin_lock_nested(&unix_sk(s)->lock, \ - SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING) - /* The AF_UNIX socket */ struct unix_sock { /* WARNING: sk has to be the first member */ @@ -77,6 +71,20 @@ static inline struct unix_sock *unix_sk(const struct sock *sk) return (struct unix_sock *)sk; } +#define unix_state_lock(s) spin_lock(&unix_sk(s)->lock) +#define unix_state_unlock(s) spin_unlock(&unix_sk(s)->lock) +enum unix_socket_lock_class { + U_LOCK_NORMAL, + U_LOCK_SECOND, /* for double locking, see unix_state_double_lock(). */ + U_LOCK_DIAG, /* used while dumping icons, see sk_diag_dump_icons(). */ +}; + +static inline void unix_state_lock_nested(struct sock *sk, + enum unix_socket_lock_class subclass) +{ + spin_lock_nested(&unix_sk(sk)->lock, subclass); +} + #define peer_wait peer_wq.wait long unix_inq_len(struct sock *sk); diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index de43459b690c..e870c835eea8 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -1225,13 +1225,11 @@ static void unix_state_double_lock(struct sock *sk1, struct sock *sk2) unix_state_lock(sk1); return; } - if (sk1 < sk2) { - unix_state_lock(sk1); - unix_state_lock_nested(sk2); - } else { - unix_state_lock(sk2); - unix_state_lock_nested(sk1); - } + if (sk1 > sk2) + swap(sk1, sk2); + + unix_state_lock(sk1); + unix_state_lock_nested(sk2, U_LOCK_SECOND); } static void unix_state_double_unlock(struct sock *sk1, struct sock *sk2) @@ -1460,7 +1458,7 @@ static int unix_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, goto out_unlock; } - unix_state_lock_nested(sk); + unix_state_lock_nested(sk, U_LOCK_SECOND); if (sk->sk_state != st) { unix_state_unlock(sk); diff --git a/net/unix/diag.c b/net/unix/diag.c index f67bf9a84783..3490a1d11b44 100644 --- a/net/unix/diag.c +++ b/net/unix/diag.c @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int sk_diag_dump_icons(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *nlskb) * queue lock. With the other's queue locked it's * OK to lock the state. */ - unix_state_lock_nested(req); + unix_state_lock_nested(req, U_LOCK_DIAG); peer = unix_sk(req)->peer; buf[i++] = (peer ? sock_i_ino(peer) : 0); unix_state_unlock(req); -- 2.34.1