-----Original Message----- From: liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 4:59 AM To: alex.williamson@redhat.com; jgg@nvidia.com; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>; Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linuxarm@openeuler.org; liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH v7 6/6] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: update function return values.
In this driver file, many functions call sub-functions and use ret to store the error code of the sub-functions. However, instead of directly returning ret to the caller, they use a converted error code, which prevents the end-user from clearly understanding the root cause of the error. Therefore, the code needs to be modified to directly return the error code from the sub-functions.
Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com> --- drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c index d12a350440d3..c63e302ac092 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int vf_qm_check_match(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev, ret = vf_qm_version_check(vf_data, dev); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to match ACC_DEV_MAGIC\n"); - return -EINVAL; + return ret; }
if (vf_data->dev_id != hisi_acc_vdev->vf_dev->device) { @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int vf_qm_check_match(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev, ret = qm_get_vft(vf_qm, &vf_qm->qp_base); if (ret <= 0) { dev_err(dev, "failed to get vft qp nums\n"); - return -EINVAL; + return ret; }
if (ret != vf_data->qp_num) { @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static int vf_qm_load_data(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev, ret = qm_write_regs(qm, QM_VF_STATE, &vf_data->vf_qm_state, 1); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to write QM_VF_STATE\n"); - return -EINVAL; + return ret; } hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm_state = vf_data->vf_qm_state;
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static int vf_qm_read_data(struct hisi_qm *vf_qm, struct acc_vf_data *vf_data)
ret = qm_get_regs(vf_qm, vf_data); if (ret) - return -EINVAL; + return ret;
/* Every reg is 32 bit, the dma address is 64 bit. */ vf_data->eqe_dma = vf_data->qm_eqc_dw[QM_XQC_ADDR_HIGH]; @@ -556,13 +556,13 @@ static int vf_qm_read_data(struct hisi_qm *vf_qm, struct acc_vf_data *vf_data) ret = qm_get_sqc(vf_qm, &vf_data->sqc_dma); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to read SQC addr!\n"); - return -EINVAL; + return ret; }
ret = qm_get_cqc(vf_qm, &vf_data->cqc_dma); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to read CQC addr!\n"); - return -EINVAL; + return ret; }
return 0; @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static int vf_qm_state_save(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev,
ret = vf_qm_read_data(vf_qm, vf_data); if (ret) - return -EINVAL; + return ret;
migf->total_length = sizeof(struct acc_vf_data); /* Save eqc and aeqc interrupt information */ @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ static int hisi_acc_vf_debug_check(struct seq_file *seq, struct vfio_device *vde ret = qm_wait_dev_not_ready(vf_qm); if (ret) { seq_puts(seq, "VF device not ready!\n"); - return -EBUSY; + return ret; }
return 0;
Any reason you avoided few other instances here? 1. qemu_set_regs() --> hisi_qm_wait_mb_ready() -->ret -EBUSY; 2. vf_qm_cache_wb() ret -EINVAL on -ETIMEOUT. With the above addressed, Reviewed-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> Thanks, Shameer