
3 Feb
2021
3 Feb
'21
12:48 a.m.
On 02/02/21 15:17, Valentin Schneider wrote:
That is, rather than building overlapping groups and fixing them whenever that breaks (distance > 2), we could have: - the local group being the child domain's span (as always) - all non-local NUMA groups spanning a single node each, with the right sgc cross-referencing.
Thoughts?
Hmph I'm thinking this can be broken by domain degeneration, as nothing will come fix up the ->sgc link and we'd be back to having a reference to a group that doesn't get updated...