Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@huawei.com> wrote:
From: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com>
Remove repeated word "that".
Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@huawei.com> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c index c3091e0..3455f2c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static void alb_fasten_mac_swap(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave1, * If @slave's permanent hw address is different both from its current * address and from @bond's address, then somewhere in the bond there's * a slave that has @slave's permanet address as its current address. - * We'll make sure that that slave no longer uses @slave's permanent address. + * We'll make sure that slave no longer uses @slave's permanent address.
This is actually correct as written, but I can see that it's a bit confusing. Rather than removing the second that, I'd suggest changing it to "... make sure the other slave no longer uses ..." to be clearer. -J --- -Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com