包管理最多做成一个组吧，有必要上升成一个委员会吗？Fedora 也就是一个组而已。 另外，需要明确一下具体的工作内容和职责 我个人初步建议 1． 纳入新包、建仓PR的审核 2． 新包打包spec的审核，包括license的合法性审核 重点应该是选包和合规的检查 发件人: Huxinwei via Tc [mailto:tc@openeuler.org] 发送时间: 2020年4月2日 11:02 收件人: 杨丽 <rainbow1981@163.com>; tc@openeuler.org 主题: [Tc] Re: [新sig提案]申请成立openEuler包管理委员会 我个人感觉是需要梳理TC活动，完善流程。 似乎没有必要单独成立新的委员会？ 能不能澄清下成立新的“Package Comittee”的理由？ From: 杨丽 [mailto:rainbow1981@163.com] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 10:45 AM To: tc@openeuler.org<mailto:tc@openeuler.org> Subject: [Tc] [新sig提案]申请成立openEuler包管理委员会 hi all This time, we specially applied to TC for establishing the "Package-Committee" on 8 April Meeting. The responsibilities of the Package-Committee are as follows: [1]. Release and maintain the packaging specifications, packaging principles and dependency specifications of the community. [2]. Implement the package introduction and exit mechanism of the TC, and preview the application of releasing the software package in community. [3]. Coordinate the division of software, and dependency conflict [4]. Work with the release manager and sig-QA team to support the release process of the community release [5]. Establish and maintain the Package Management TOOL solution to support automation and traceability of package management PR application link : https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/132 Thank you for your opinions. [https://mail-online.nosdn.127.net/qiyelogo/defaultAvatar.png] 杨丽 软件工程师 华为技术有限公司 rainbow1981@163.com<mailto:rainbow1981@163.com> 签名由 网易邮箱大师<https://mail.163.com/dashi/dlpro.html?from=mail81> 定制