From: shaodenghui shaodenghui@huawei.com
euleros inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I94XYA CVE: NA
-------------------------------------------------
Currently, single thread workqueue only have single pwq, all of works are queued the same workerpool. This is not optimal on NUMA machines, will cause workers jump around across node.
This patch add a new wq flags __WQ_DYNAMIC, this new kind of single thread workqueue creates a separate pwq covering the intersecting CPUS for each NUMA node which has online CPUS in @attrs->cpumask instead of mapping all entries of numa_pwq_tbl[] to the same pwq. After this, we can specify the @cpu of queue_work_on, so the work can be executed on the same NUMA node of the specified @cpu. This kind of wq only support single work, multi works can't guarantee the work's order.
Signed-off-by: shaodenghui shaodenghui@huawei.com --- kernel/workqueue.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 1888741f5edd..fc733366d5f4 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -4355,6 +4355,9 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq, * it even if we don't use it immediately. */ copy_workqueue_attrs(new_attrs, attrs); + if (wq->flags & __WQ_DYNAMIC) + new_attrs->ordered = false; + wqattrs_actualize_cpumask(new_attrs, unbound_cpumask); cpumask_copy(new_attrs->__pod_cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask); ctx->dfl_pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, new_attrs); @@ -4591,10 +4594,12 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq) cpus_read_lock(); if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) { ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, ordered_wq_attrs[highpri]); - /* there should only be single pwq for ordering guarantee */ - WARN(!ret && (wq->pwqs.next != &wq->dfl_pwq->pwqs_node || - wq->pwqs.prev != &wq->dfl_pwq->pwqs_node), - "ordering guarantee broken for workqueue %s\n", wq->name); + if (!(wq->flags & __WQ_DYNAMIC)) { + /* there should only be single pwq for ordering guarantee */ + WARN(!ret && (wq->pwqs.next != &wq->dfl_pwq->pwqs_node || + wq->pwqs.prev != &wq->dfl_pwq->pwqs_node), + "ordering guarantee broken for workqueue %s\n", wq->name); + } } else { ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, unbound_std_wq_attrs[highpri]); } @@ -5798,7 +5803,7 @@ static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t unbound_cpumask) continue;
/* creating multiple pwqs breaks ordering guarantee */ - if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs)) { + if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs) && !(wq->flags & __WQ_DYNAMIC)) { if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT) continue; wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED;