From: Ming Lei ming.lei@redhat.com
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.9-rc3 commit bcb21c8cc9947286211327d663ace69f07d37a76 category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: NA
-------------------------------------------------
In case of block device backend, if the backend supports write zeros, the loop device will set queue flag of QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD. However, limits.discard_granularity isn't setup, and this way is wrong, see the following description in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block:
A discard_granularity of 0 means that the device does not support discard functionality.
Especially 9b15d109a6b2 ("block: improve discard bio alignment in __blkdev_issue_discard()") starts to take q->limits.discard_granularity for computing max discard sectors. And zero discard granularity may cause kernel oops, or fail discard request even though the loop queue claims discard support via QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD.
Fix the issue by setup discard granularity and alignment.
Fixes: c52abf563049 ("loop: Better discard support for block devices") Signed-off-by: Ming Lei ming.lei@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Acked-by: Coly Li colyli@suse.de Cc: Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.com Cc: Xiao Ni xni@redhat.com Cc: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com Cc: Evan Green evgreen@chromium.org Cc: Gwendal Grignou gwendal@chromium.org Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz andrzej.p@collabora.com Cc: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Yufen Yu yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com --- drivers/block/loop.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c index da68c42aed68..19042b42a8ba 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo) struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host; struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue; + u32 granularity, max_discard_sectors;
/* * If the backing device is a block device, mirror its zeroing @@ -876,11 +877,10 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo) struct request_queue *backingq;
backingq = bdev_get_queue(inode->i_bdev); - blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, - backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors);
- blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, - backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors); + max_discard_sectors = backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors; + granularity = backingq->limits.discard_granularity ?: + queue_physical_block_size(backingq);
/* * We use punch hole to reclaim the free space used by the @@ -889,23 +889,26 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo) * useful information. */ } else if (!file->f_op->fallocate || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) { - q->limits.discard_granularity = 0; - q->limits.discard_alignment = 0; - blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0); - blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0); + max_discard_sectors = 0; + granularity = 0;
} else { - q->limits.discard_granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; - q->limits.discard_alignment = 0; - - blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9); - blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9); + max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX >> 9; + granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; }
- if (q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors) + if (max_discard_sectors) { + q->limits.discard_granularity = granularity; + blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, max_discard_sectors); + blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, max_discard_sectors); blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q); - else + } else { + q->limits.discard_granularity = 0; + blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0); + blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0); blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q); + } + q->limits.discard_alignment = 0; }
static void loop_unprepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)