From: Erik Kaneda erik.kaneda@intel.com
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.6-rc1 commit 5ddbd77181dfca61b16d2e2222382ea65637f1b9 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5LBE7 CVE: NA
--------------------------------
ACPICA commit 29cc8dbc5463a93625bed87d7550a8bed8913bf4
create_buffer_field is a deferred op that is typically processed in load pass 2. However, disassembly of control method contents walk the parse tree with ACPI_PARSE_LOAD_PASS1 and AML_CREATE operators are processed in a later walk. This is a problem when there is a control method that has the same name as the AML_CREATE object. In this case, any use of the name segment will be detected as a method call rather than a reference to a buffer field. If this is detected as a method call, it can result in a mal-formed parse tree if the control methods have parameters.
This change in processing AML_CREATE ops earlier solves this issue by inserting the named object in the ACPI namespace so that references to this name would be detected as a name string rather than a method call.
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/29cc8dbc Reported-by: Elia Geretto elia.f.geretto@gmail.com Tested-by: Elia Geretto elia.f.geretto@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Bob Moore robert.moore@intel.com Signed-off-by: Erik Kaneda erik.kaneda@intel.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo guohanjun@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu liuyongqiang13@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/acpica/dsfield.c | 2 +- drivers/acpi/acpica/dswload.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsfield.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsfield.c index 30fe89545d6a..bcc6a7acc576 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsfield.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsfield.c @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ acpi_ds_create_buffer_field(union acpi_parse_object *op, * FUNCTION: acpi_ds_get_field_names * * PARAMETERS: info - create_field info structure - * ` walk_state - Current method state + * walk_state - Current method state * arg - First parser arg for the field name list * * RETURN: Status diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dswload.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dswload.c index d06c41446282..ba53662f1217 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dswload.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dswload.c @@ -412,6 +412,27 @@ acpi_status acpi_ds_load1_end_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state) ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_DISPATCH, "Op=%p State=%p\n", op, walk_state));
+ /* + * Disassembler: handle create field operators here. + * + * create_buffer_field is a deferred op that is typically processed in load + * pass 2. However, disassembly of control method contents walk the parse + * tree with ACPI_PARSE_LOAD_PASS1 and AML_CREATE operators are processed + * in a later walk. This is a problem when there is a control method that + * has the same name as the AML_CREATE object. In this case, any use of the + * name segment will be detected as a method call rather than a reference + * to a buffer field. + * + * This earlier creation during disassembly solves this issue by inserting + * the named object in the ACPI namespace so that references to this name + * would be a name string rather than a method call. + */ + if ((walk_state->parse_flags & ACPI_PARSE_DISASSEMBLE) && + (walk_state->op_info->flags & AML_CREATE)) { + status = acpi_ds_create_buffer_field(op, walk_state); + return_ACPI_STATUS(status); + } + /* We are only interested in opcodes that have an associated name */
if (!(walk_state->op_info->flags & (AML_NAMED | AML_FIELD))) {