From: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com
[ Upstream commit 7c09c03091ac562ddca2b393e5d65c1d37da79f1 ]
Deleting a subvolume on a full filesystem leads to ENOSPC followed by a forced read-only. This is not a transaction abort and the filesystem is otherwise ok, so the error should be just propagated to the callers.
This is caused by unnecessary call to btrfs_handle_fs_error for all errors, except EAGAIN. This does not make sense as the standard transaction abort mechanism is in btrfs_drop_snapshot so all relevant failures are handled.
Originally in commit cb1b69f4508a ("Btrfs: forced readonly when btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails") there was no return value at all, so the btrfs_std_error made some sense but once the error handling and propagation has been implemented we don't need it anymore.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 971dc8694e50..94cfcbeaac6d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -9098,8 +9098,6 @@ int btrfs_drop_snapshot(struct btrfs_root *root, */ if (!for_reloc && !root_dropped) btrfs_add_dead_root(root); - if (err && err != -EAGAIN) - btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, err, NULL); return err; }