From: Zhen Lei thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
hulk inclusion category: feature bugzilla: 174251 CVE: NA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
One SMMU has only one normal CMDQ. Therefore, this CMDQ is used regardless of the core on which the command is inserted. It can be referenced directly through "smmu->cmdq". However, one SMMU has multiple ECMDQs, and the ECMDQ used by the core on which the command insertion is executed may be different. So the helper function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() is added, which returns the CMDQ/ECMDQ that the current core should use. Currently, the code that supports ECMDQ is not added. just simply returns "&smmu->cmdq".
Many subfunctions of arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() use "&smmu->cmdq" or "&smmu->cmdq.q" directly. To support ECMDQ, they need to call the newly added function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() instead.
Note that normal CMDQ is still required until ECMDQ is available.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo guohanjun@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai zhengzengkai@huawei.com --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 22 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c index f1b6597b1b0e..cc607b871411 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -333,10 +333,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) return 0; }
+static struct arm_smmu_cmdq *arm_smmu_get_cmdq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) +{ + return &smmu->cmdq; +} + static void arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, - u32 prod) + struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u32 prod) { - struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q; struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = { .opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC, }; @@ -576,7 +580,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, { unsigned long flags; struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); int ret = 0;
/* @@ -592,7 +596,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); do { - llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val); + llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val); if (!queue_full(llq)) break;
@@ -611,7 +615,7 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, { int ret = 0; struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); u32 *cmd = (u32 *)(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, llq->prod));
queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); @@ -634,12 +638,12 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq) { struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); u32 prod = llq->prod; int ret = 0;
queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); - llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val); + llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val); do { if (queue_consumed(llq, prod)) break; @@ -729,7 +733,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 prod; unsigned long flags; bool owner; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq = { .max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift, }, head = llq; @@ -769,7 +773,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, arm_smmu_cmdq_write_entries(cmdq, cmds, llq.prod, n); if (sync) { prod = queue_inc_prod_n(&llq, n); - arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(cmd_sync, smmu, prod); + arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(cmd_sync, smmu, &cmdq->q, prod); queue_write(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, prod), cmd_sync, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS);
/*