From: Jia He justin.he@arm.com
[ Upstream commit 83d116c53058d505ddef051e90ab27f57015b025 ]
When we tested pmdk unit test [1] vmmalloc_fork TEST3 on arm64 guest, there will be a double page fault in __copy_from_user_inatomic of cow_user_page.
To reproduce the bug, the cmd is as follows after you deployed everything: make -C src/test/vmmalloc_fork/ TEST_TIME=60m check
Below call trace is from arm64 do_page_fault for debugging purpose: [ 110.016195] Call trace: [ 110.016826] do_page_fault+0x5a4/0x690 [ 110.017812] do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0 [ 110.018726] el1_da+0x20/0xc4 [ 110.019492] __arch_copy_from_user+0x180/0x280 [ 110.020646] do_wp_page+0xb0/0x860 [ 110.021517] __handle_mm_fault+0x994/0x1338 [ 110.022606] handle_mm_fault+0xe8/0x180 [ 110.023584] do_page_fault+0x240/0x690 [ 110.024535] do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0 [ 110.025423] el0_da+0x20/0x24
The pte info before __copy_from_user_inatomic is (PTE_AF is cleared): [ffff9b007000] pgd=000000023d4f8003, pud=000000023da9b003, pmd=000000023d4b3003, pte=360000298607bd3
As told by Catalin: "On arm64 without hardware Access Flag, copying from user will fail because the pte is old and cannot be marked young. So we always end up with zeroed page after fork() + CoW for pfn mappings. we don't always have a hardware-managed access flag on arm64."
This patch fixes it by calling pte_mkyoung. Also, the parameter is changed because vmf should be passed to cow_user_page()
Add a WARN_ON_ONCE when __copy_from_user_inatomic() returns error in case there can be some obscure use-case (by Kirill).
[1] https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/tree/master/src/test/vmmalloc_fork
Signed-off-by: Jia He justin.he@arm.com Reported-by: Yibo Cai Yibo.Cai@arm.com Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com --- mm/memory.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 852d2ffcc08d..6a3d5eebc951 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -117,6 +117,18 @@ int randomize_va_space __read_mostly = 2; #endif
+#ifndef arch_faults_on_old_pte +static inline bool arch_faults_on_old_pte(void) +{ + /* + * Those arches which don't have hw access flag feature need to + * implement their own helper. By default, "true" means pagefault + * will be hit on old pte. + */ + return true; +} +#endif + static int __init disable_randmaps(char *s) { randomize_va_space = 0; @@ -2089,32 +2101,82 @@ static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, return same; }
-static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma) +static inline bool cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, + struct vm_fault *vmf) { + bool ret; + void *kaddr; + void __user *uaddr; + bool force_mkyoung; + struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; + unsigned long addr = vmf->address; + debug_dma_assert_idle(src);
+ if (likely(src)) { + copy_user_highpage(dst, src, addr, vma); + return true; + } + /* * If the source page was a PFN mapping, we don't have * a "struct page" for it. We do a best-effort copy by * just copying from the original user address. If that * fails, we just zero-fill it. Live with it. */ - if (unlikely(!src)) { - void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(dst); - void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)(va & PAGE_MASK); + kaddr = kmap_atomic(dst); + uaddr = (void __user *)(addr & PAGE_MASK); + + /* + * On architectures with software "accessed" bits, we would + * take a double page fault, so mark it accessed here. + */ + force_mkyoung = arch_faults_on_old_pte() && !pte_young(vmf->orig_pte); + if (force_mkyoung) { + pte_t entry; + + vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, vmf->pmd, addr, &vmf->ptl); + if (!likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) { + /* + * Other thread has already handled the fault + * and we don't need to do anything. If it's + * not the case, the fault will be triggered + * again on the same address. + */ + ret = false; + goto pte_unlock; + }
+ entry = pte_mkyoung(vmf->orig_pte); + if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, vmf->pte, entry, 0)) + update_mmu_cache(vma, addr, vmf->pte); + } + + /* + * This really shouldn't fail, because the page is there + * in the page tables. But it might just be unreadable, + * in which case we just give up and fill the result with + * zeroes. + */ + if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(kaddr, uaddr, PAGE_SIZE)) { /* - * This really shouldn't fail, because the page is there - * in the page tables. But it might just be unreadable, - * in which case we just give up and fill the result with - * zeroes. + * Give a warn in case there can be some obscure + * use-case */ - if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(kaddr, uaddr, PAGE_SIZE)) - clear_page(kaddr); - kunmap_atomic(kaddr); - flush_dcache_page(dst); - } else - copy_user_highpage(dst, src, va, vma); + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + clear_page(kaddr); + } + + ret = true; + +pte_unlock: + if (force_mkyoung) + pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); + kunmap_atomic(kaddr); + flush_dcache_page(dst); + + return ret; }
static gfp_t __get_fault_gfp_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma) @@ -2268,7 +2330,19 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) vmf->address); if (!new_page) goto oom; - cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, vmf->address, vma); + + if (!cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, vmf)) { + /* + * COW failed, if the fault was solved by other, + * it's fine. If not, userspace would re-fault on + * the same address and we will handle the fault + * from the second attempt. + */ + put_page(new_page); + if (old_page) + put_page(old_page); + return 0; + } }
if (mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL, &memcg, false))