From: Vladimir Oltean vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
stable inclusion from stable-5.10.58 commit c0b14a0e61e7c852749ed036a1092f720c1887d1 bugzilla: 176984 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4E2P4
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit 589918df93226a1e5f104306c185b6dcf2bd8051 ]
Similar but not quite the same with what was done in commit b11f0a4c0c81 ("net: dsa: sja1105: be stateless when installing FDB entries") for SJA1105E/T, it is desirable to drop the priv->vlan_aware check and simply go ahead and install FDB entries in the VLAN that was given by the bridge.
As opposed to SJA1105E/T, in SJA1105P/Q/R/S and SJA1110, the FDB is a maskable TCAM, and we are installing VLAN-unaware FDB entries with the VLAN ID masked off. However, such FDB entries might completely obscure VLAN-aware entries where the VLAN ID is included in the search mask, because the switch looks up the FDB from left to right and picks the first entry which results in a masked match. So it depends on whether the bridge installs first the VLAN-unaware or the VLAN-aware FDB entries.
Anyway, if we had a VLAN-unaware FDB entry towards one set of DESTPORTS and a VLAN-aware one towards other set of DESTPORTS, the result is that the packets in VLAN-aware mode will be forwarded towards the DESTPORTS specified by the VLAN-unaware entry.
To solve this, simply do not use the masked matching ability of the FDB for VLAN ID, and always match precisely on it. In VLAN-unaware mode, we configure the switch for shared VLAN learning, so the VLAN ID will be ignored anyway during lookup, so it is redundant to mask it off in the TCAM.
This patch conflicts with net-next commit 0fac6aa098ed ("net: dsa: sja1105: delete the best_effort_vlan_filtering mode") which changed this line: if (priv->vlan_state != SJA1105_VLAN_UNAWARE) { into: if (priv->vlan_aware) {
When merging with net-next, the lines added by this patch should take precedence in the conflict resolution (i.e. the "if" condition should be deleted in both cases).
Fixes: 1da73821343c ("net: dsa: sja1105: Add FDB operations for P/Q/R/S series") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Acked-by: Weilong Chen chenweilong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com --- drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 18 ++++-------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c index 52d8cc1a95fa..e65be1380803 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c @@ -1389,13 +1389,8 @@ int sja1105pqrs_fdb_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, l2_lookup.vlanid = vid; l2_lookup.iotag = SJA1105_S_TAG; l2_lookup.mask_macaddr = GENMASK_ULL(ETH_ALEN * 8 - 1, 0); - if (priv->vlan_state != SJA1105_VLAN_UNAWARE) { - l2_lookup.mask_vlanid = VLAN_VID_MASK; - l2_lookup.mask_iotag = BIT(0); - } else { - l2_lookup.mask_vlanid = 0; - l2_lookup.mask_iotag = 0; - } + l2_lookup.mask_vlanid = VLAN_VID_MASK; + l2_lookup.mask_iotag = BIT(0); l2_lookup.destports = BIT(port);
rc = sja1105_dynamic_config_read(priv, BLK_IDX_L2_LOOKUP, @@ -1482,13 +1477,8 @@ int sja1105pqrs_fdb_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, l2_lookup.vlanid = vid; l2_lookup.iotag = SJA1105_S_TAG; l2_lookup.mask_macaddr = GENMASK_ULL(ETH_ALEN * 8 - 1, 0); - if (priv->vlan_state != SJA1105_VLAN_UNAWARE) { - l2_lookup.mask_vlanid = VLAN_VID_MASK; - l2_lookup.mask_iotag = BIT(0); - } else { - l2_lookup.mask_vlanid = 0; - l2_lookup.mask_iotag = 0; - } + l2_lookup.mask_vlanid = VLAN_VID_MASK; + l2_lookup.mask_iotag = BIT(0); l2_lookup.destports = BIT(port);
rc = sja1105_dynamic_config_read(priv, BLK_IDX_L2_LOOKUP,