From: Zhen Lei thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
stable inclusion from stable-5.10.69 commit 0796d99c1b16f03fd34024a26da2e81ec1c728c1 bugzilla: 182675 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4I3ED
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
commit 98e2e409e76ef7781d8511f997359e9c504a95c1 upstream.
When the refcount is decreased to 0, the resource reclamation branch is entered. Before CPU0 reaches the race point (1), CPU1 may obtain the spinlock and traverse the rbtree to find 'root', see nilfs_lookup_root().
Although CPU1 will call refcount_inc() to increase the refcount, it is obviously too late. CPU0 will release 'root' directly, CPU1 then accesses 'root' and triggers UAF.
Use refcount_dec_and_lock() to ensure that both the operations of decrease refcount to 0 and link deletion are lock protected eliminates this risk.
CPU0 CPU1 nilfs_put_root(): <-------- (1) spin_lock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock); rb_erase(&root->rb_node, &nilfs->ns_cptree); spin_unlock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock);
kfree(root); <-------- use-after-free
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 9476 at lib/refcount.c:28 \ refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 lib/refcount.c:28 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 9476 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.45-rc1+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 lib/refcount.c:28 ... ... Call Trace: __refcount_sub_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:283 [inline] __refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:315 [inline] refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:333 [inline] nilfs_put_root+0xc1/0xd0 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:795 nilfs_segctor_destroy fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2749 [inline] nilfs_detach_log_writer+0x3fa/0x570 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2812 nilfs_put_super+0x2f/0xf0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:467 generic_shutdown_super+0xcd/0x1f0 fs/super.c:464 kill_block_super+0x4a/0x90 fs/super.c:1446 deactivate_locked_super+0x6a/0xb0 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0x85/0x90 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x277/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:1118 __cleanup_mnt+0x15/0x20 fs/namespace.c:1125 task_work_run+0x8e/0x110 kernel/task_work.c:151 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:164 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x13c/0x170 kernel/entry/common.c:191 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x30 kernel/entry/common.c:266 do_syscall_64+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:56 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
There is no reproduction program, and the above is only theoretical analysis.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1629859428-5906-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@g... Fixes: ba65ae4729bf ("nilfs2: add checkpoint tree to nilfs object") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210723012317.4146-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Acked-by: Weilong Chen chenweilong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com --- fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index 221a1cc597f0..c20ebecd7bc2 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -792,14 +792,13 @@ nilfs_find_or_create_root(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, __u64 cno)
void nilfs_put_root(struct nilfs_root *root) { - if (refcount_dec_and_test(&root->count)) { - struct the_nilfs *nilfs = root->nilfs; + struct the_nilfs *nilfs = root->nilfs;
- nilfs_sysfs_delete_snapshot_group(root); - - spin_lock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock); + if (refcount_dec_and_lock(&root->count, &nilfs->ns_cptree_lock)) { rb_erase(&root->rb_node, &nilfs->ns_cptree); spin_unlock(&nilfs->ns_cptree_lock); + + nilfs_sysfs_delete_snapshot_group(root); iput(root->ifile);
kfree(root);