From: Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com
[ Upstream commit 88b2e9b06381551b707d980627ad0591191f7a2d ]
The 64 bit ino is being compared to the product of two u32 values, however, the multiplication is being performed using a 32 bit multiply so there is a potential of an overflow. To be fully safe, cast uspi->s_ncg to a u64 to ensure a 64 bit multiplication occurs to avoid any chance of overflow.
Fixes: f3e2a520f5fb ("ufs: NFS support") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov dushistov@mail.ru Cc: Alexey Dobriyan adobriyan@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200715170355.1081713-1-colin.king@canonical.com Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow") Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/ufs/super.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ufs/super.c b/fs/ufs/super.c index a4e07e910f1b4..6e59e45d7bfbd 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/super.c +++ b/fs/ufs/super.c @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static struct inode *ufs_nfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, u64 ino, u32 gene struct ufs_sb_private_info *uspi = UFS_SB(sb)->s_uspi; struct inode *inode;
- if (ino < UFS_ROOTINO || ino > uspi->s_ncg * uspi->s_ipg) + if (ino < UFS_ROOTINO || ino > (u64)uspi->s_ncg * uspi->s_ipg) return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
inode = ufs_iget(sb, ino);