From: Ye Bin yebin10@huawei.com
maillist inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I6K53I CVE: NA
Reference: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/patch/20230116020015.1506120...
--------------------------------
Syzbot found the following issue:
EXT4-fs: Warning: mounting with data=journal disables delayed allocation, dioread_nolock, O_DIRECT and fast_commit support! EXT4-fs (loop0): orphan cleanup on readonly fs ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5067 at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1869 mb_find_extent+0x8a1/0xe30 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 5067 Comm: syz-executor307 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 RIP: 0010:mb_find_extent+0x8a1/0xe30 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1869 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003c9e098 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff82405731 RBX: 0000000000000041 RCX: ffff8880783457c0 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000041 RDI: 0000000000000040 RBP: 0000000000000040 R08: ffffffff82405723 R09: ffffed10053c9402 R10: ffffed10053c9402 R11: 1ffff110053c9401 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffc90003c9e538 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffffc90003c9e2cc FS: 0000555556665300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000056312f6796f8 CR3: 0000000022437000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_mb_complex_scan_group+0x353/0x1100 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2307 ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x1533/0x3860 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2735 ext4_mb_new_blocks+0xddf/0x3db0 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:5605 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1868/0x6880 fs/ext4/extents.c:4286 ext4_map_blocks+0xa49/0x1cc0 fs/ext4/inode.c:651 ext4_getblk+0x1b9/0x770 fs/ext4/inode.c:864 ext4_bread+0x2a/0x170 fs/ext4/inode.c:920 ext4_quota_write+0x225/0x570 fs/ext4/super.c:7105 write_blk fs/quota/quota_tree.c:64 [inline] get_free_dqblk+0x34a/0x6d0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:130 do_insert_tree+0x26b/0x1aa0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:340 do_insert_tree+0x722/0x1aa0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:375 do_insert_tree+0x722/0x1aa0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:375 do_insert_tree+0x722/0x1aa0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:375 dq_insert_tree fs/quota/quota_tree.c:401 [inline] qtree_write_dquot+0x3b6/0x530 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:420 v2_write_dquot+0x11b/0x190 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:358 dquot_acquire+0x348/0x670 fs/quota/dquot.c:444 ext4_acquire_dquot+0x2dc/0x400 fs/ext4/super.c:6740 dqget+0x999/0xdc0 fs/quota/dquot.c:914 __dquot_initialize+0x3d0/0xcf0 fs/quota/dquot.c:1492 ext4_process_orphan+0x57/0x2d0 fs/ext4/orphan.c:329 ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474 __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5516 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x81cd/0x8700 fs/ext4/super.c:5644 get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1282 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1489 do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3145 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3674 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Add some debug information: mb_find_extent: mb_find_extent block=41, order=0 needed=64 next=0 ex=0/41/1@3735929054 64 64 7 block_bitmap: ff 3f 0c 00 fc 01 00 00 d2 3d 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
Acctually, blocks per group is 64, but block bitmap indicate at least has 128 blocks. Now, ext4_validate_block_bitmap() didn't check invalid block's bitmap if set. To resolve above issue, add check like fsck "Padding at end of block bitmap is not set".
Reported-by: syzbot+68223fe9f6c95ad43bed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Ye Bin yebin10@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng chengzhihao1@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Yang Erkun yangerkun@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Hou Tao houtao1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu liuyongqiang13@huawei.com --- fs/ext4/balloc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c index d5a87464245e..77243483a596 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c @@ -303,6 +303,22 @@ struct ext4_group_desc * ext4_get_group_desc(struct super_block *sb, return desc; }
+static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bitmap_padding(struct super_block *sb, + ext4_group_t block_group, + struct buffer_head *bh) +{ + ext4_grpblk_t next_zero_bit; + unsigned long bitmap_size = sb->s_blocksize * 8; + unsigned int offset = num_clusters_in_group(sb, block_group); + + if (bitmap_size <= offset) + return 0; + + next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data, bitmap_size, offset); + + return (next_zero_bit < bitmap_size ? next_zero_bit : 0); +} + /* * Return the block number which was discovered to be invalid, or 0 if * the block bitmap is valid. @@ -395,6 +411,15 @@ static int ext4_validate_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT); return -EFSCORRUPTED; } + blk = ext4_valid_block_bitmap_padding(sb, block_group, bh); + if (unlikely(blk != 0)) { + ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group); + ext4_error(sb, "bg %u: block %llu: padding at end of block bitmap is not set", + block_group, blk); + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, block_group, + EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT); + return -EFSCORRUPTED; + } set_buffer_verified(bh); verified: ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);