From: Chen Yu yu.c.chen@intel.com
commit 1a371e67dc77125736cc56d3a0893f06b75855b6 upstream.
Currently, scan_microcode() leverages microcode_matches() to check if the microcode matches the CPU by comparing the family and model. However, the processor stepping and flags of the microcode signature should also be considered when saving a microcode patch for early update.
Use find_matching_signature() in scan_microcode() and get rid of the now-unused microcode_matches() which is a good cleanup in itself.
Complete the verification of the patch being saved for early loading in save_microcode_patch() directly. This needs to be done there too because save_mc_for_early() will call save_microcode_patch() too.
The second reason why this needs to be done is because the loader still tries to support, at least hypothetically, mixed-steppings systems and thus adds all patches to the cache that belong to the same CPU model albeit with different steppings.
For example:
microcode: CPU: sig=0x906ec, pf=0x2, rev=0xd6 microcode: mc_saved[0]: sig=0x906e9, pf=0x2a, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23 microcode: mc_saved[1]: sig=0x906ea, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19000, date = 2020-04-27 microcode: mc_saved[2]: sig=0x906eb, pf=0x2, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23 microcode: mc_saved[3]: sig=0x906ec, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19000, date = 2020-04-27 microcode: mc_saved[4]: sig=0x906ed, pf=0x22, rev=0xd6, total size=0x19400, date = 2020-04-23
The patch which is being saved for early loading, however, can only be the one which fits the CPU this runs on so do the signature verification before saving.
[ bp: Do signature verification in save_microcode_patch() and rewrite commit message. ]
Fixes: ec400ddeff20 ("x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU") Signed-off-by: Chen Yu yu.c.chen@intel.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208535 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113015923.13960-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 63 +++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index 16936a24795c..3aa0e5a45303 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -103,53 +103,6 @@ static int has_newer_microcode(void *mc, unsigned int csig, int cpf, int new_rev return find_matching_signature(mc, csig, cpf); }
-/* - * Given CPU signature and a microcode patch, this function finds if the - * microcode patch has matching family and model with the CPU. - * - * %true - if there's a match - * %false - otherwise - */ -static bool microcode_matches(struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header, - unsigned long sig) -{ - unsigned long total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header); - unsigned long data_size = get_datasize(mc_header); - struct extended_sigtable *ext_header; - unsigned int fam_ucode, model_ucode; - struct extended_signature *ext_sig; - unsigned int fam, model; - int ext_sigcount, i; - - fam = x86_family(sig); - model = x86_model(sig); - - fam_ucode = x86_family(mc_header->sig); - model_ucode = x86_model(mc_header->sig); - - if (fam == fam_ucode && model == model_ucode) - return true; - - /* Look for ext. headers: */ - if (total_size <= data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE) - return false; - - ext_header = (void *) mc_header + data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE; - ext_sig = (void *)ext_header + EXT_HEADER_SIZE; - ext_sigcount = ext_header->count; - - for (i = 0; i < ext_sigcount; i++) { - fam_ucode = x86_family(ext_sig->sig); - model_ucode = x86_model(ext_sig->sig); - - if (fam == fam_ucode && model == model_ucode) - return true; - - ext_sig++; - } - return false; -} - static struct ucode_patch *memdup_patch(void *data, unsigned int size) { struct ucode_patch *p; @@ -167,7 +120,7 @@ static struct ucode_patch *memdup_patch(void *data, unsigned int size) return p; }
-static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size) +static void save_microcode_patch(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, void *data, unsigned int size) { struct microcode_header_intel *mc_hdr, *mc_saved_hdr; struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p = NULL; @@ -213,6 +166,9 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size) if (!p) return;
+ if (!find_matching_signature(p->data, uci->cpu_sig.sig, uci->cpu_sig.pf)) + return; + /* * Save for early loading. On 32-bit, that needs to be a physical * address as the APs are running from physical addresses, before @@ -347,13 +303,14 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool save)
size -= mc_size;
- if (!microcode_matches(mc_header, uci->cpu_sig.sig)) { + if (!find_matching_signature(data, uci->cpu_sig.sig, + uci->cpu_sig.pf)) { data += mc_size; continue; }
if (save) { - save_microcode_patch(data, mc_size); + save_microcode_patch(uci, data, mc_size); goto next; }
@@ -486,14 +443,14 @@ static void show_saved_mc(void) * Save this microcode patch. It will be loaded early when a CPU is * hot-added or resumes. */ -static void save_mc_for_early(u8 *mc, unsigned int size) +static void save_mc_for_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, u8 *mc, unsigned int size) { /* Synchronization during CPU hotplug. */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);
mutex_lock(&x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);
- save_microcode_patch(mc, size); + save_microcode_patch(uci, mc, size); show_saved_mc();
mutex_unlock(&x86_cpu_microcode_mutex); @@ -937,7 +894,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size, * permanent memory. So it will be loaded early when a CPU is hot added * or resumes. */ - save_mc_for_early(new_mc, new_mc_size); + save_mc_for_early(uci, new_mc, new_mc_size);
pr_debug("CPU%d found a matching microcode update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n", cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);