From: Laibin Qiu qiulaibin@huawei.com
hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: 181879 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4DDEL
--------------------------
KASAN reports a use-after-free report when doing fuzz test:
[693354.104835] ================================================================== [693354.105094] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bfq_io_set_weight_legacy+0xd3/0x160 [693354.105336] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888be0a35664 by task sh/1453338
[693354.105607] CPU: 41 PID: 1453338 Comm: sh Kdump: loaded Not tainted 4.18.0-147 [693354.105610] Hardware name: Huawei 2288H V5/BC11SPSCB0, BIOS 0.81 07/02/2018 [693354.105612] Call Trace: [693354.105621] dump_stack+0xf1/0x19b [693354.105626] ? show_regs_print_info+0x5/0x5 [693354.105634] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [693354.105638] ? cpumask_weight+0x1f/0x1f [693354.105648] print_address_description+0x70/0x360 [693354.105654] kasan_report+0x1b2/0x330 [693354.105659] ? bfq_io_set_weight_legacy+0xd3/0x160 [693354.105665] ? bfq_io_set_weight_legacy+0xd3/0x160 [693354.105670] bfq_io_set_weight_legacy+0xd3/0x160 [693354.105675] ? bfq_cpd_init+0x20/0x20 [693354.105683] cgroup_file_write+0x3aa/0x510 [693354.105693] ? ___slab_alloc+0x507/0x540 [693354.105698] ? cgroup_file_poll+0x60/0x60 [693354.105702] ? 0xffffffff89600000 [693354.105708] ? usercopy_abort+0x90/0x90 [693354.105716] ? mutex_lock+0xef/0x180 [693354.105726] kernfs_fop_write+0x1ab/0x280 [693354.105732] ? cgroup_file_poll+0x60/0x60 [693354.105738] vfs_write+0xe7/0x230 [693354.105744] ksys_write+0xb0/0x140 [693354.105749] ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 [693354.105760] do_syscall_64+0x112/0x370 [693354.105766] ? syscall_return_slowpath+0x260/0x260 [693354.105772] ? do_page_fault+0x9b/0x270 [693354.105779] ? prepare_exit_to_usermode+0xf9/0x1a0 [693354.105784] ? enter_from_user_mode+0x30/0x30 [693354.105793] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
[693354.105875] Allocated by task 1453337: [693354.106001] kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0 [693354.106006] kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x108/0x220 [693354.106010] bfq_pd_alloc+0x96/0x120 [693354.106015] blkcg_activate_policy+0x1b7/0x2b0 [693354.106020] bfq_create_group_hierarchy+0x1e/0x80 [693354.106026] bfq_init_queue+0x678/0x8c0 [693354.106031] blk_mq_init_sched+0x1f8/0x460 [693354.106037] elevator_switch_mq+0xe1/0x240 [693354.106041] elevator_switch+0x25/0x40 [693354.106045] elv_iosched_store+0x1a1/0x230 [693354.106049] queue_attr_store+0x78/0xb0 [693354.106053] kernfs_fop_write+0x1ab/0x280 [693354.106056] vfs_write+0xe7/0x230 [693354.106060] ksys_write+0xb0/0x140 [693354.106064] do_syscall_64+0x112/0x370 [693354.106069] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
[693354.106114] Freed by task 1453336: [693354.106225] __kasan_slab_free+0x130/0x180 [693354.106229] kfree+0x90/0x1b0 [693354.106233] blkcg_deactivate_policy+0x12c/0x220 [693354.106238] bfq_exit_queue+0xf5/0x110 [693354.106241] blk_mq_exit_sched+0x104/0x130 [693354.106245] __elevator_exit+0x45/0x60 [693354.106249] elevator_switch_mq+0xd6/0x240 [693354.106253] elevator_switch+0x25/0x40 [693354.106257] elv_iosched_store+0x1a1/0x230 [693354.106261] queue_attr_store+0x78/0xb0 [693354.106264] kernfs_fop_write+0x1ab/0x280 [693354.106268] vfs_write+0xe7/0x230 [693354.106271] ksys_write+0xb0/0x140 [693354.106275] do_syscall_64+0x112/0x370 [693354.106280] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
[693354.106329] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888be0a35580 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 [693354.106736] The buggy address is located 228 bytes inside of 1024-byte region [ffff888be0a35580, ffff888be0a35980) [693354.107114] The buggy address belongs to the page: [693354.107273] page:ffffea002f828c00 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff888107c17080 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 [693354.107606] flags: 0x17ffffc0008100(slab|head) [693354.107760] raw: 0017ffffc0008100 ffffea002fcbc808 ffffea0030bd3a08 ffff888107c17080 [693354.108020] raw: 0000000000000000 00000000001c001c 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [693354.108278] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[693354.108511] Memory state around the buggy address: [693354.108671] ffff888be0a35500: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [693354.116396] ffff888be0a35580: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [693354.124473] >ffff888be0a35600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [693354.132421] ^ [693354.140284] ffff888be0a35680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [693354.147912] ffff888be0a35700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [693354.155281] ==================================================================
blkgs are protected by both queue and blkcg locks and holding either should stabilize them. However, the path of destroying blkg policy data is only protected by queue lock in blkcg_activate_policy()/blkcg_deactivate_policy(). Other tasks can get the blkg policy data before the blkg policy data is destroyed, and use it after destroyed, which will result in a use-after-free.
CPU0 CPU1 blkcg_deactivate_policy spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock) bfq_io_set_weight_legacy spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock) blkg_to_bfqg(blkg) pd_to_bfqg(blkg->pd[pol->plid]) ^^^^^^blkg->pd[pol->plid] != NULL bfqg != NULL pol->pd_free_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]) pd_to_bfqg(blkg->pd[pol->plid]) bfqg_put(bfqg) kfree(bfqg) blkg->pd[pol->plid] = NULL spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock); bfq_group_set_weight(bfqg, val, 0) bfqg->entity.new_weight ^^^^^^trigger uaf here spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
Fix by garbbing the matching blkcg lock before trying to destroy blkg policy data.
Signed-off-by: Li Jinlin lijinlin3@huawei.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/YUDLt9uBNLhWL6Gt@slm.duckdns.org/T/#r07c...
Conflicts: block/blk-cgroup.c
Signed-off-by: Laibin Qiu qiulaibin@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jason Yan yanaijie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai zhengzengkai@huawei.com --- block/blk-cgroup.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c index f13688c4b931..5b19665bc486 100644 --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c @@ -1387,10 +1387,14 @@ int blkcg_activate_policy(struct request_queue *q, /* alloc failed, nothing's initialized yet, free everything */ spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); list_for_each_entry(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node) { + struct blkcg *blkcg = blkg->blkcg; + + spin_lock(&blkcg->lock); if (blkg->pd[pol->plid]) { pol->pd_free_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]); blkg->pd[pol->plid] = NULL; } + spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock); } spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); ret = -ENOMEM; @@ -1422,12 +1426,16 @@ void blkcg_deactivate_policy(struct request_queue *q, __clear_bit(pol->plid, q->blkcg_pols);
list_for_each_entry(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node) { + struct blkcg *blkcg = blkg->blkcg; + + spin_lock(&blkcg->lock); if (blkg->pd[pol->plid]) { if (pol->pd_offline_fn) pol->pd_offline_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]); pol->pd_free_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]); blkg->pd[pol->plid] = NULL; } + spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock); }
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);