[PATCH openEuler-5.10 29/90] x86/sgx: Clarify 'laundry_list' locking

From: Dave Hansen dave.hansen@linux.intel.com

mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.11-rc1 commit 67655b57f8f59467506463055d9a8398d2836377 category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4SIGI CVE: NA

--------------------------------

Short Version:

The SGX section->laundry_list structure is effectively thread-local, but declared next to some shared structures. Its semantics are clear as mud. Fix that. No functional changes. Compile tested only.

Long Version:

The SGX hardware keeps per-page metadata. This can provide things like permissions, integrity and replay protection. It also prevents things like having an enclave page mapped multiple times or shared between enclaves.

But, that presents a problem for kexec()'d kernels (or any other kernel that does not run immediately after a hardware reset). This is because the last kernel may have been rude and forgotten to reset pages, which would trigger the "shared page" sanity check.

To fix this, the SGX code "launders" the pages by running the EREMOVE instruction on all pages at boot. This is slow and can take a long time, so it is performed off in the SGX-specific ksgxd instead of being synchronous at boot. The init code hands the list of pages to launder in a per-SGX-section list: ->laundry_list. The only code to touch this list is the init code and ksgxd. This means that no locking is necessary for ->laundry_list.

However, a lock is required for section->page_list, which is accessed while creating enclaves and by ksgxd. This lock (section->lock) is acquired by ksgxd while also processing ->laundry_list. It is easy to confuse the purpose of the locking as being for ->laundry_list and ->page_list.

Rename ->laundry_list to ->init_laundry_list to make it clear that this is not normally used at runtime. Also add some comments clarifying the locking, and reorganize 'sgx_epc_section' to put 'lock' near the things it protects.

Note: init_laundry_list is 128 bytes of wasted space at runtime. It could theoretically be dynamically allocated and then freed after the laundering process. But it would take nearly 128 bytes of extra instructions to do that.

Intel-SIG: commit 67655b57f8f5 x86/sgx: Clarify 'laundry_list' locking Backport for SGX Foundations support

Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201116222531.4834-1-dave.hansen@intel.com Signed-off-by: Fan Du fan.du@intel.com #openEuler_contributor Signed-off-by: Laibin Qiu qiulaibin@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Bamvor Zhang bamvor.zhang@suse.com Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai zhengzengkai@huawei.com --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 14 ++++++++------ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h | 15 ++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c index 3426785df457..c519fc5f6948 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c @@ -36,13 +36,15 @@ static void sgx_sanitize_section(struct sgx_epc_section *section) LIST_HEAD(dirty); int ret;

- while (!list_empty(&section->laundry_list)) { + /* init_laundry_list is thread-local, no need for a lock: */ + while (!list_empty(&section->init_laundry_list)) { if (kthread_should_stop()) return;

+ /* needed for access to ->page_list: */ spin_lock(&section->lock);

- page = list_first_entry(&section->laundry_list, + page = list_first_entry(&section->init_laundry_list, struct sgx_epc_page, list);

ret = __eremove(sgx_get_epc_virt_addr(page)); @@ -56,7 +58,7 @@ static void sgx_sanitize_section(struct sgx_epc_section *section) cond_resched(); }

- list_splice(&dirty, &section->laundry_list); + list_splice(&dirty, &section->init_laundry_list); }

static bool sgx_reclaimer_age(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page) @@ -418,7 +420,7 @@ static int ksgxd(void *p) sgx_sanitize_section(&sgx_epc_sections[i]);

/* Should never happen. */ - if (!list_empty(&sgx_epc_sections[i].laundry_list)) + if (!list_empty(&sgx_epc_sections[i].init_laundry_list)) WARN(1, "EPC section %d has unsanitized pages.\n", i); }

@@ -635,13 +637,13 @@ static bool __init sgx_setup_epc_section(u64 phys_addr, u64 size, section->phys_addr = phys_addr; spin_lock_init(&section->lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&section->page_list); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&section->laundry_list); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&section->init_laundry_list);

for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) { section->pages[i].section = index; section->pages[i].flags = 0; section->pages[i].owner = NULL; - list_add_tail(&section->pages[i].list, &section->laundry_list); + list_add_tail(&section->pages[i].list, &section->init_laundry_list); }

section->free_cnt = nr_pages; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h index a188a683ffb6..5fa42d143feb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h @@ -34,15 +34,24 @@ struct sgx_epc_page { * physical memory e.g. for memory areas of the each node. This structure is * used to store EPC pages for one EPC section and virtual memory area where * the pages have been mapped. + * + * 'lock' must be held before accessing 'page_list' or 'free_cnt'. */ struct sgx_epc_section { unsigned long phys_addr; void *virt_addr; - struct list_head page_list; - struct list_head laundry_list; struct sgx_epc_page *pages; - unsigned long free_cnt; + spinlock_t lock; + struct list_head page_list; + unsigned long free_cnt; + + /* + * Pages which need EREMOVE run on them before they can be + * used. Only safe to be accessed in ksgxd and init code. + * Not protected by locks. + */ + struct list_head init_laundry_list; };

extern struct sgx_epc_section sgx_epc_sections[SGX_MAX_EPC_SECTIONS];