From: Ben Hutchings ben.hutchings@mind.be
stable inclusion from stable-5.10.65 commit 6f3c58bd62f2a39d25cefb0ad313b0c1012b8260 bugzilla: 182361 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4EH3U
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit fe4d55773b879c785ae61da9b1c2160f0110f67e ]
lockdep complains that in omap-aes, the list_lock is taken both with softirqs enabled at probe time, and also in softirq context, which could lead to a deadlock:
================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 5.14.0-rc1-00035-gc836005b01c5-dirty #69 Not tainted -------------------------------- inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. ksoftirqd/0/7 [HC0[0]:SC1[3]:HE1:SE0] takes: bf00e014 (list_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: omap_aes_find_dev+0x18/0x54 [omap_aes_driver] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50 omap_aes_probe+0x1d4/0x664 [omap_aes_driver] platform_probe+0x58/0xb8 really_probe+0xbc/0x314 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0xe4 driver_probe_device+0x30/0xc8 __driver_attach+0x70/0xf4 bus_for_each_dev+0x70/0xb4 bus_add_driver+0xf0/0x1d4 driver_register+0x74/0x108 do_one_initcall+0x84/0x2e4 do_init_module+0x5c/0x240 load_module+0x221c/0x2584 sys_finit_module+0xb0/0xec ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c 0xbed90b30 irq event stamp: 111800 hardirqs last enabled at (111800): [<c02a21e4>] __kmalloc+0x484/0x5ec hardirqs last disabled at (111799): [<c02a21f0>] __kmalloc+0x490/0x5ec softirqs last enabled at (111776): [<c01015f0>] __do_softirq+0x2b8/0x4d0 softirqs last disabled at (111781): [<c0135948>] run_ksoftirqd+0x34/0x50
other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 ---- lock(list_lock); <Interrupt> lock(list_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by ksoftirqd/0/7: #0: c0f5e8c8 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: netif_receive_skb+0x6c/0x260 #1: c0f5e8c8 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2c/0xdc
stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc1-00035-gc836005b01c5-dirty #69 Hardware name: Generic AM43 (Flattened Device Tree) [<c010e6e0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010b9d0>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010b9d0>] (show_stack) from [<c017c640>] (mark_lock.part.17+0x5bc/0xd04) [<c017c640>] (mark_lock.part.17) from [<c017d9e4>] (__lock_acquire+0x960/0x2fa4) [<c017d9e4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0180980>] (lock_acquire+0x10c/0x358) [<c0180980>] (lock_acquire) from [<c093d324>] (_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x44/0x58) [<c093d324>] (_raw_spin_lock_bh) from [<bf00b258>] (omap_aes_find_dev+0x18/0x54 [omap_aes_driver]) [<bf00b258>] (omap_aes_find_dev [omap_aes_driver]) from [<bf00b328>] (omap_aes_crypt+0x94/0xd4 [omap_aes_driver]) [<bf00b328>] (omap_aes_crypt [omap_aes_driver]) from [<c08ac6d0>] (esp_input+0x1b0/0x2c8) [<c08ac6d0>] (esp_input) from [<c08c9e90>] (xfrm_input+0x410/0x1290) [<c08c9e90>] (xfrm_input) from [<c08b6374>] (xfrm4_esp_rcv+0x54/0x11c) [<c08b6374>] (xfrm4_esp_rcv) from [<c0838840>] (ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x48/0x3bc) [<c0838840>] (ip_protocol_deliver_rcu) from [<c0838c50>] (ip_local_deliver_finish+0x9c/0xdc) [<c0838c50>] (ip_local_deliver_finish) from [<c0838dd8>] (ip_local_deliver+0x148/0x1b0) [<c0838dd8>] (ip_local_deliver) from [<c0838f5c>] (ip_rcv+0x11c/0x180) [<c0838f5c>] (ip_rcv) from [<c077e3a4>] (__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x54/0x74) [<c077e3a4>] (__netif_receive_skb_one_core) from [<c077e588>] (netif_receive_skb+0xa8/0x260) [<c077e588>] (netif_receive_skb) from [<c068d6d4>] (cpsw_rx_handler+0x224/0x2fc) [<c068d6d4>] (cpsw_rx_handler) from [<c0688ccc>] (__cpdma_chan_process+0xf4/0x188) [<c0688ccc>] (__cpdma_chan_process) from [<c068a0c0>] (cpdma_chan_process+0x3c/0x5c) [<c068a0c0>] (cpdma_chan_process) from [<c0690e14>] (cpsw_rx_mq_poll+0x44/0x98) [<c0690e14>] (cpsw_rx_mq_poll) from [<c0780810>] (__napi_poll+0x28/0x268) [<c0780810>] (__napi_poll) from [<c0780c64>] (net_rx_action+0xcc/0x204) [<c0780c64>] (net_rx_action) from [<c0101478>] (__do_softirq+0x140/0x4d0) [<c0101478>] (__do_softirq) from [<c0135948>] (run_ksoftirqd+0x34/0x50) [<c0135948>] (run_ksoftirqd) from [<c01583b8>] (smpboot_thread_fn+0xf4/0x1d8) [<c01583b8>] (smpboot_thread_fn) from [<c01546dc>] (kthread+0x14c/0x174) [<c01546dc>] (kthread) from [<c010013c>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x38) ...
The omap-des and omap-sham drivers appear to have a similar issue.
Fix this by using spin_{,un}lock_bh() around device list access in all the probe and remove functions.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ben.hutchings@mind.be Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Acked-by: Weilong Chen chenweilong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com --- drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/crypto/omap-des.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c | 12 ++++++------ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c b/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c index 0dd4c6b157de..9b968ac4ee7b 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/omap-aes.c @@ -1175,9 +1175,9 @@ static int omap_aes_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) spin_lock_init(&dd->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->list); - spin_lock(&list_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&list_lock); list_add_tail(&dd->list, &dev_list); - spin_unlock(&list_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&list_lock);
/* Initialize crypto engine */ dd->engine = crypto_engine_alloc_init(dev, 1); @@ -1264,9 +1264,9 @@ static int omap_aes_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!dd) return -ENODEV;
- spin_lock(&list_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&list_lock); list_del(&dd->list); - spin_unlock(&list_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&list_lock);
for (i = dd->pdata->algs_info_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) for (j = dd->pdata->algs_info[i].registered - 1; j >= 0; j--) { diff --git a/drivers/crypto/omap-des.c b/drivers/crypto/omap-des.c index c9d38bcfd1c7..7fdf38e07adf 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/omap-des.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/omap-des.c @@ -1035,9 +1035,9 @@ static int omap_des_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->list); - spin_lock(&list_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&list_lock); list_add_tail(&dd->list, &dev_list); - spin_unlock(&list_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&list_lock);
/* Initialize des crypto engine */ dd->engine = crypto_engine_alloc_init(dev, 1); @@ -1096,9 +1096,9 @@ static int omap_des_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!dd) return -ENODEV;
- spin_lock(&list_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&list_lock); list_del(&dd->list); - spin_unlock(&list_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&list_lock);
for (i = dd->pdata->algs_info_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) for (j = dd->pdata->algs_info[i].registered - 1; j >= 0; j--) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c b/drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c index a47ac60a4ee1..63beea7cdba5 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c @@ -2144,9 +2144,9 @@ static int omap_sham_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) (rev & dd->pdata->major_mask) >> dd->pdata->major_shift, (rev & dd->pdata->minor_mask) >> dd->pdata->minor_shift);
- spin_lock(&sham.lock); + spin_lock_bh(&sham.lock); list_add_tail(&dd->list, &sham.dev_list); - spin_unlock(&sham.lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&sham.lock);
dd->engine = crypto_engine_alloc_init(dev, 1); if (!dd->engine) { @@ -2194,9 +2194,9 @@ static int omap_sham_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) err_engine_start: crypto_engine_exit(dd->engine); err_engine: - spin_lock(&sham.lock); + spin_lock_bh(&sham.lock); list_del(&dd->list); - spin_unlock(&sham.lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&sham.lock); err_pm: pm_runtime_disable(dev); if (!dd->polling_mode) @@ -2215,9 +2215,9 @@ static int omap_sham_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) dd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); if (!dd) return -ENODEV; - spin_lock(&sham.lock); + spin_lock_bh(&sham.lock); list_del(&dd->list); - spin_unlock(&sham.lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&sham.lock); for (i = dd->pdata->algs_info_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) for (j = dd->pdata->algs_info[i].registered - 1; j >= 0; j--) { crypto_unregister_ahash(