From: Shmulik Ladkani shmulik@metanetworks.com
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.173 commit 6790d6f3cb46d6212e9cabfc82d8be0a34cb08bd
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit 56ce7c25ae1525d83cf80a880cf506ead1914250 ]
When setting xfrm replay_window to values higher than 32, a rare page-fault occurs in xfrm_replay_advance_bmp:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff8af350ad7920 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD ad001067 P4D ad001067 PUD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 3 PID: 30 Comm: ksoftirqd/3 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.4.52-050452-generic #202007160732 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:xfrm_replay_advance_bmp+0xbb/0x130 RSP: 0018:ffffa1304013ba40 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 000000000000010d RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00000000ffffff4b RDX: 0000000000000018 RSI: 00000000004c234c RDI: 00000000ffb3dbff RBP: ffffa1304013ba50 R08: ffff8af330ad7920 R09: 0000000007fffffa R10: 0000000000000800 R11: 0000000000000010 R12: ffff8af29d6258c0 R13: ffff8af28b95c700 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8af29d6258fc FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8af339ac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff8af350ad7920 CR3: 0000000015ee4000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 Call Trace: xfrm_input+0x4e5/0xa10 xfrm4_rcv_encap+0xb5/0xe0 xfrm4_udp_encap_rcv+0x140/0x1c0
Analysis revealed offending code is when accessing:
replay_esn->bmp[nr] |= (1U << bitnr);
with 'nr' being 0x07fffffa.
This happened in an SMP system when reordering of packets was present; A packet arrived with a "too old" sequence number (outside the window, i.e 'diff > replay_window'), and therefore the following calculation:
bitnr = replay_esn->replay_window - (diff - pos);
yields a negative result, but since bitnr is u32 we get a large unsigned quantity (in crash dump above: 0xffffff4b seen in ecx).
This was supposed to be protected by xfrm_input()'s former call to:
if (x->repl->check(x, skb, seq)) {
However, the state's spinlock x->lock is *released* after '->check()' is performed, and gets re-acquired before '->advance()' - which gives a chance for a different core to update the xfrm state, e.g. by advancing 'replay_esn->seq' when it encounters more packets - leading to a 'diff > replay_window' situation when original core continues to xfrm_replay_advance_bmp().
An attempt to fix this issue was suggested in commit bcf66bf54aab ("xfrm: Perform a replay check after return from async codepaths"), by calling 'x->repl->recheck()' after lock is re-acquired, but fix applied only to asyncronous crypto algorithms.
Augment the fix, by *always* calling 'recheck()' - irrespective if we're using async crypto.
Fixes: 0ebea8ef3559 ("[IPSEC]: Move state lock into x->type->input") Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert steffen.klassert@secunet.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Aichun Li liaichun@huawei.com reviewed-by: wangxiaopeng wangxiaopeng7@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Cheng Jian cj.chengjian@huawei.com --- net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c index 0ee13d12782f..fcba8a139f61 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type) /* only the first xfrm gets the encap type */ encap_type = 0;
- if (async && x->repl->recheck(x, skb, seq)) { + if (x->repl->recheck(x, skb, seq)) { XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATESEQERROR); goto drop_unlock; }