From: Ye Bin yebin10@huawei.com
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.11-rc1 commit 0bab8db4152c4a2185a1367db09cc402bdc62d5e category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IAJ5DD CVE: NA
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
--------------------------------
We encountered a problem that the file system could not be mounted in the power-off scenario. The analysis of the file system mirror shows that only part of the data is written to the last commit block. The valid data of the commit block is concentrated in the first sector. However, the data of the entire block is involved in the checksum calculation. For different hardware, the minimum atomic unit may be different. If the checksum of a committed block is incorrect, clear the data except the 'commit_header' and then calculate the checksum. If the checkusm is correct, it is considered that the block is partially committed, Then continue to replay journal.
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin yebin10@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240620072405.3533701-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu
Conflicts: fs/jbd2/recovery.c [There is a context conflict because commit a20d1cebb98b ("jbd2: fix portability problems caused by unaligned accesses") is not merged.] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com --- fs/jbd2/recovery.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c index 55f89fcee666..3aa91c8bf8d2 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c @@ -401,6 +401,27 @@ static int jbd2_commit_block_csum_verify(journal_t *j, void *buf) return provided == cpu_to_be32(calculated); }
+static bool jbd2_commit_block_csum_verify_partial(journal_t *j, void *buf) +{ + struct commit_header *h; + __be32 provided; + __u32 calculated; + void *tmpbuf; + + tmpbuf = kzalloc(j->j_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tmpbuf) + return false; + + memcpy(tmpbuf, buf, sizeof(struct commit_header)); + h = tmpbuf; + provided = h->h_chksum[0]; + h->h_chksum[0] = 0; + calculated = jbd2_chksum(j, j->j_csum_seed, tmpbuf, j->j_blocksize); + kfree(tmpbuf); + + return provided == cpu_to_be32(calculated); +} + static int jbd2_block_tag_csum_verify(journal_t *j, journal_block_tag_t *tag, void *buf, __u32 sequence) { @@ -768,6 +789,13 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal, if (pass == PASS_SCAN && !jbd2_commit_block_csum_verify(journal, bh->b_data)) { + if (jbd2_commit_block_csum_verify_partial( + journal, + bh->b_data)) { + pr_notice("JBD2: Find incomplete commit block in transaction %u block %lu\n", + next_commit_ID, next_log_block); + goto chksum_ok; + } chksum_error: if (commit_time < last_trans_commit_time) goto ignore_crc_mismatch; @@ -780,8 +808,10 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal, break; } } - if (pass == PASS_SCAN) + if (pass == PASS_SCAN) { + chksum_ok: last_trans_commit_time = commit_time; + } brelse(bh); next_commit_ID++; continue; @@ -798,6 +828,7 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal, next_log_block); need_check_commit_time = true; } + /* If we aren't in the REVOKE pass, then we can * just skip over this block. */ if (pass != PASS_REVOKE) {