From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
stable inclusion from stable-5.10.55 commit d01328fef6afffd1bdce6e8ead707b6f5a5de7a7 bugzilla: 175636 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4DYWD
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit b3b2177a2d795e35dc11597b2609eb1e7e57e570 ]
Syzbot reports a possible recursive lock in [1].
This happens due to missing lock nesting information. From the logs, we see that a call to hfs_fill_super is made to mount the hfs filesystem. While searching for the root inode, the lock on the catalog btree is grabbed. Then, when the parent of the root isn't found, a call to __hfs_bnode_create is made to create the parent of the root. This eventually leads to a call to hfs_ext_read_extent which grabs a lock on the extents btree.
Since the order of locking is catalog btree -> extents btree, this lock hierarchy does not lead to a deadlock.
To tell lockdep that this locking is safe, we add nesting notation to distinguish between catalog btrees, extents btrees, and attributes btrees (for HFS+). This has already been done in hfsplus.
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f007ef1d7a31a469e3be7aeb0fde0769b18585d... [1] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko slava@dubeyko.com Cc: Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavoars@kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Acked-by: Weilong Chen chenweilong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com --- fs/hfs/bfind.c | 14 +++++++++++++- fs/hfs/btree.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/hfs/bfind.c b/fs/hfs/bfind.c index 4af318fbda77..ef9498a6e88a 100644 --- a/fs/hfs/bfind.c +++ b/fs/hfs/bfind.c @@ -25,7 +25,19 @@ int hfs_find_init(struct hfs_btree *tree, struct hfs_find_data *fd) fd->key = ptr + tree->max_key_len + 2; hfs_dbg(BNODE_REFS, "find_init: %d (%p)\n", tree->cnid, __builtin_return_address(0)); - mutex_lock(&tree->tree_lock); + switch (tree->cnid) { + case HFS_CAT_CNID: + mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, CATALOG_BTREE_MUTEX); + break; + case HFS_EXT_CNID: + mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, EXTENTS_BTREE_MUTEX); + break; + case HFS_ATTR_CNID: + mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, ATTR_BTREE_MUTEX); + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } return 0; }
diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.h b/fs/hfs/btree.h index 4ba45caf5939..0e6baee93245 100644 --- a/fs/hfs/btree.h +++ b/fs/hfs/btree.h @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ typedef int (*btree_keycmp)(const btree_key *, const btree_key *);
#define NODE_HASH_SIZE 256
+/* B-tree mutex nested subclasses */ +enum hfs_btree_mutex_classes { + CATALOG_BTREE_MUTEX, + EXTENTS_BTREE_MUTEX, + ATTR_BTREE_MUTEX, +}; + /* A HFS BTree held in memory */ struct hfs_btree { struct super_block *sb;