From: Abel Wu wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.8-rc1 commit 2227a957e1d5b1941be4e4207879ec74f4bb37f8 category: performance bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I9EHKI CVE: NA
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=2227a...
--------------------------------
Sort the task timeline by virtual deadline and keep the min_vruntime in the augmented tree, so we can avoid doubling the worst case cost and make full use of the cached leftmost node to enable O(1) fastpath picking in next patch.
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu wuyun.abel@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115033647.80785-3-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao zhangqiao22@huawei.com --- include/linux/sched.h | 2 +- kernel/sched/debug.c | 11 ++- kernel/sched/fair.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++------------------------- kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index c3452e1830ca..b65d74c5e765 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ struct sched_entity { struct load_weight load; struct rb_node run_node; u64 deadline; - u64 min_deadline; + u64 min_vruntime;
struct list_head group_node; unsigned int on_rq; diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index ebec719e204c..8b3063398bbd 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -628,8 +628,8 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu)
void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { - s64 left_vruntime = -1, min_vruntime, right_vruntime = -1, spread; - struct sched_entity *last, *first; + s64 left_vruntime = -1, min_vruntime, right_vruntime = -1, left_deadline = -1, spread; + struct sched_entity *last, *first, *root; struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu); unsigned long flags;
@@ -644,15 +644,20 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) SPLIT_NS(cfs_rq->exec_clock));
raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(rq, flags); + root = __pick_root_entity(cfs_rq); + if (root) + left_vruntime = root->min_vruntime; first = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq); if (first) - left_vruntime = first->vruntime; + left_deadline = first->deadline; last = __pick_last_entity(cfs_rq); if (last) right_vruntime = last->vruntime; min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime; raw_spin_rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, flags);
+ SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "left_deadline", + SPLIT_NS(left_deadline)); SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "left_vruntime", SPLIT_NS(left_vruntime)); SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", "min_vruntime", diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 7079251d1178..c0a53774eefb 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -708,7 +708,11 @@ static inline u64 min_vruntime(u64 min_vruntime, u64 vruntime) static inline bool entity_before(const struct sched_entity *a, const struct sched_entity *b) { - return (s64)(a->vruntime - b->vruntime) < 0; + /* + * Tiebreak on vruntime seems unnecessary since it can + * hardly happen. + */ + return (s64)(a->deadline - b->deadline) < 0; }
static inline s64 entity_key(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) @@ -877,7 +881,7 @@ static void update_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) * Note: using 'avg_vruntime() > se->vruntime' is inacurate due * to the loss in precision caused by the division. */ -int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) +static int vruntime_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime) { struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr; s64 avg = cfs_rq->avg_vruntime; @@ -890,7 +894,12 @@ int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) load += weight; }
- return avg >= entity_key(cfs_rq, se) * load; + return avg >= (s64)(vruntime - cfs_rq->min_vruntime) * load; +} + +int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) +{ + return vruntime_eligible(cfs_rq, se->vruntime); }
static u64 __update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime) @@ -909,9 +918,8 @@ static u64 __update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime)
static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { - struct sched_entity *se = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq); + struct sched_entity *se = __pick_root_entity(cfs_rq); struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr; - u64 vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
if (curr) { @@ -923,9 +931,9 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
if (se) { if (!curr) - vruntime = se->vruntime; + vruntime = se->min_vruntime; else - vruntime = min_vruntime(vruntime, se->vruntime); + vruntime = min_vruntime(vruntime, se->min_vruntime); }
/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */ @@ -938,34 +946,34 @@ static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) return entity_before(__node_2_se(a), __node_2_se(b)); }
-#define deadline_gt(field, lse, rse) ({ (s64)((lse)->field - (rse)->field) > 0; }) +#define vruntime_gt(field, lse, rse) ({ (s64)((lse)->field - (rse)->field) > 0; })
-static inline void __update_min_deadline(struct sched_entity *se, struct rb_node *node) +static inline void __min_vruntime_update(struct sched_entity *se, struct rb_node *node) { if (node) { struct sched_entity *rse = __node_2_se(node); - if (deadline_gt(min_deadline, se, rse)) - se->min_deadline = rse->min_deadline; + if (vruntime_gt(min_vruntime, se, rse)) + se->min_vruntime = rse->min_vruntime; } }
/* - * se->min_deadline = min(se->deadline, left->min_deadline, right->min_deadline) + * se->min_vruntime = min(se->vruntime, {left,right}->min_vruntime) */ -static inline bool min_deadline_update(struct sched_entity *se, bool exit) +static inline bool min_vruntime_update(struct sched_entity *se, bool exit) { - u64 old_min_deadline = se->min_deadline; + u64 old_min_vruntime = se->min_vruntime; struct rb_node *node = &se->run_node;
- se->min_deadline = se->deadline; - __update_min_deadline(se, node->rb_right); - __update_min_deadline(se, node->rb_left); + se->min_vruntime = se->vruntime; + __min_vruntime_update(se, node->rb_right); + __min_vruntime_update(se, node->rb_left);
- return se->min_deadline == old_min_deadline; + return se->min_vruntime == old_min_vruntime; }
-RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS(static, min_deadline_cb, struct sched_entity, - run_node, min_deadline, min_deadline_update); +RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS(static, min_vruntime_cb, struct sched_entity, + run_node, min_vruntime, min_vruntime_update);
/* * Enqueue an entity into the rb-tree: @@ -973,18 +981,28 @@ RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS(static, min_deadline_cb, struct sched_entity, static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) { avg_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se); - se->min_deadline = se->deadline; + se->min_vruntime = se->vruntime; rb_add_augmented_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline, - __entity_less, &min_deadline_cb); + __entity_less, &min_vruntime_cb); }
static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) { rb_erase_augmented_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline, - &min_deadline_cb); + &min_vruntime_cb); avg_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se); }
+struct sched_entity *__pick_root_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) +{ + struct rb_node *root = cfs_rq->tasks_timeline.rb_root.rb_node; + + if (!root) + return NULL; + + return __node_2_se(root); +} + struct sched_entity *__pick_first_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { struct rb_node *left = rb_first_cached(&cfs_rq->tasks_timeline); @@ -1007,23 +1025,28 @@ struct sched_entity *__pick_first_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) * with the earliest virtual deadline. * * We can do this in O(log n) time due to an augmented RB-tree. The - * tree keeps the entries sorted on service, but also functions as a - * heap based on the deadline by keeping: + * tree keeps the entries sorted on deadline, but also functions as a + * heap based on the vruntime by keeping: * - * se->min_deadline = min(se->deadline, se->{left,right}->min_deadline) + * se->min_vruntime = min(se->vruntime, se->{left,right}->min_vruntime) * - * Which allows an EDF like search on (sub)trees. + * Which allows tree pruning through eligibility. */ -static struct sched_entity *__pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) +static struct sched_entity *pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { struct rb_node *node = cfs_rq->tasks_timeline.rb_root.rb_node; struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr; struct sched_entity *best = NULL; - struct sched_entity *best_left = NULL; + + /* + * We can safely skip eligibility check if there is only one entity + * in this cfs_rq, saving some cycles. + */ + if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) + return curr && curr->on_rq ? curr : __node_2_se(node);
if (curr && (!curr->on_rq || !entity_eligible(cfs_rq, curr))) curr = NULL; - best = curr;
/* * Once selected, run a task until it either becomes non-eligible or @@ -1032,95 +1055,38 @@ static struct sched_entity *__pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) if (sched_feat(RUN_TO_PARITY) && curr && curr->vlag == curr->deadline) return curr;
+ /* Heap search for the EEVD entity */ while (node) { struct sched_entity *se = __node_2_se(node); + struct rb_node *left = node->rb_left;
/* - * If this entity is not eligible, try the left subtree. + * Eligible entities in left subtree are always better + * choices, since they have earlier deadlines. */ - if (!entity_eligible(cfs_rq, se)) { - node = node->rb_left; + if (left && vruntime_eligible(cfs_rq, + __node_2_se(left)->min_vruntime)) { + node = left; continue; }
/* - * Now we heap search eligible trees for the best (min_)deadline + * The left subtree either is empty or has no eligible + * entity, so check the current node since it is the one + * with earliest deadline that might be eligible. */ - if (!best || deadline_gt(deadline, best, se)) + if (entity_eligible(cfs_rq, se)) { best = se; - - /* - * Every se in a left branch is eligible, keep track of the - * branch with the best min_deadline - */ - if (node->rb_left) { - struct sched_entity *left = __node_2_se(node->rb_left); - - if (!best_left || deadline_gt(min_deadline, best_left, left)) - best_left = left; - - /* - * min_deadline is in the left branch. rb_left and all - * descendants are eligible, so immediately switch to the second - * loop. - */ - if (left->min_deadline == se->min_deadline) - break; - } - - /* min_deadline is at this node, no need to look right */ - if (se->deadline == se->min_deadline) break; - - /* else min_deadline is in the right branch. */ - node = node->rb_right; - } - - /* - * We ran into an eligible node which is itself the best. - * (Or nr_running == 0 and both are NULL) - */ - if (!best_left || (s64)(best_left->min_deadline - best->deadline) > 0) - return best; - - /* - * Now best_left and all of its children are eligible, and we are just - * looking for deadline == min_deadline - */ - node = &best_left->run_node; - while (node) { - struct sched_entity *se = __node_2_se(node); - - /* min_deadline is the current node */ - if (se->deadline == se->min_deadline) - return se; - - /* min_deadline is in the left branch */ - if (node->rb_left && - __node_2_se(node->rb_left)->min_deadline == se->min_deadline) { - node = node->rb_left; - continue; }
- /* else min_deadline is in the right branch */ node = node->rb_right; } - return NULL; -}
-static struct sched_entity *pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) -{ - struct sched_entity *se = __pick_eevdf(cfs_rq); - - if (!se) { - struct sched_entity *left = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq); - if (left) { - pr_err("EEVDF scheduling fail, picking leftmost\n"); - return left; - } - } + if (!best || (curr && entity_before(curr, best))) + best = curr;
- return se; + return best; }
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index d12206cb6cb8..f643777adbe4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -2995,6 +2995,7 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_2(double_rq_lock, struct rq, double_rq_lock(_T->lock, _T->lock2), double_rq_unlock(_T->lock, _T->lock2))
+extern struct sched_entity *__pick_root_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); extern struct sched_entity *__pick_first_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); extern struct sched_entity *__pick_last_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);