From: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.84 commit ef55f0f8af2b64ddf9e23518bd11475f9fc7e16d bugzilla: 186030 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4QV2F
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
commit f7e5b9bfa6c8820407b64eabc1f29c9a87e8993d upstream.
On ARM v6 and later, we define CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS because the ordinary load/store instructions (ldr, ldrh, ldrb) can tolerate any misalignment of the memory address. However, load/store double and load/store multiple instructions (ldrd, ldm) may still only be used on memory addresses that are 32-bit aligned, and so we have to use the CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS macro with care, or we may end up with a severe performance hit due to alignment traps that require fixups by the kernel. Testing shows that this currently happens with clang-13 but not gcc-11. In theory, any compiler version can produce this bug or other problems, as we are dealing with undefined behavior in C99 even on architectures that support this in hardware, see also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363.
Fortunately, the get_unaligned() accessors do the right thing: when building for ARMv6 or later, the compiler will emit unaligned accesses using the ordinary load/store instructions (but avoid the ones that require 32-bit alignment). When building for older ARM, those accessors will emit the appropriate sequence of ldrb/mov/orr instructions. And on architectures that can truly tolerate any kind of misalignment, the get_unaligned() accessors resolve to the leXX_to_cpup accessors that operate on aligned addresses.
Since the compiler will in fact emit ldrd or ldm instructions when building this code for ARM v6 or later, the solution is to use the unaligned accessors unconditionally on architectures where this is known to be fast. The _aligned version of the hash function is however still needed to get the best performance on architectures that cannot do any unaligned access in hardware.
This new version avoids the undefined behavior and should produce the fastest hash on all architectures we support.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20181008211554.5355-4-ard.biesheuve... Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/CAK8P3a2KfmmGDbVHULWevB0hv71P2oi2ZCHEAq... Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Fixes: 2c956a60778c ("siphash: add cryptographically secure PRF") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de Reviewed-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Jason@zx2c4.com Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel ardb@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Jason@zx2c4.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai zhengzengkai@huawei.com --- include/linux/siphash.h | 14 ++++---------- lib/siphash.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/siphash.h b/include/linux/siphash.h index bf21591a9e5e..0cda61855d90 100644 --- a/include/linux/siphash.h +++ b/include/linux/siphash.h @@ -27,9 +27,7 @@ static inline bool siphash_key_is_zero(const siphash_key_t *key) }
u64 __siphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key); -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS u64 __siphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key); -#endif
u64 siphash_1u64(const u64 a, const siphash_key_t *key); u64 siphash_2u64(const u64 a, const u64 b, const siphash_key_t *key); @@ -82,10 +80,9 @@ static inline u64 ___siphash_aligned(const __le64 *data, size_t len, static inline u64 siphash(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key) { -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS - if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT)) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) || + !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT)) return __siphash_unaligned(data, len, key); -#endif return ___siphash_aligned(data, len, key); }
@@ -96,10 +93,8 @@ typedef struct {
u32 __hsiphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key); -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS u32 __hsiphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key); -#endif
u32 hsiphash_1u32(const u32 a, const hsiphash_key_t *key); u32 hsiphash_2u32(const u32 a, const u32 b, const hsiphash_key_t *key); @@ -135,10 +130,9 @@ static inline u32 ___hsiphash_aligned(const __le32 *data, size_t len, static inline u32 hsiphash(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key) { -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS - if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, HSIPHASH_ALIGNMENT)) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) || + !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, HSIPHASH_ALIGNMENT)) return __hsiphash_unaligned(data, len, key); -#endif return ___hsiphash_aligned(data, len, key); }
diff --git a/lib/siphash.c b/lib/siphash.c index c47bb6ff2149..025f0cbf6d7a 100644 --- a/lib/siphash.c +++ b/lib/siphash.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ SIPROUND; \ return (v0 ^ v1) ^ (v2 ^ v3);
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS u64 __siphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key) { const u8 *end = data + len - (len % sizeof(u64)); @@ -80,8 +81,8 @@ u64 __siphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key) POSTAMBLE } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__siphash_aligned); +#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS u64 __siphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key) { const u8 *end = data + len - (len % sizeof(u64)); @@ -113,7 +114,6 @@ u64 __siphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key) POSTAMBLE } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__siphash_unaligned); -#endif
/** * siphash_1u64 - compute 64-bit siphash PRF value of a u64 @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(siphash_3u32); HSIPROUND; \ return (v0 ^ v1) ^ (v2 ^ v3);
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS u32 __hsiphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key) { const u8 *end = data + len - (len % sizeof(u64)); @@ -280,8 +281,8 @@ u32 __hsiphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key) HPOSTAMBLE } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__hsiphash_aligned); +#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS u32 __hsiphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key) { @@ -313,7 +314,6 @@ u32 __hsiphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, HPOSTAMBLE } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__hsiphash_unaligned); -#endif
/** * hsiphash_1u32 - compute 64-bit hsiphash PRF value of a u32 @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hsiphash_4u32); HSIPROUND; \ return v1 ^ v3;
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS u32 __hsiphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key) { const u8 *end = data + len - (len % sizeof(u32)); @@ -438,8 +439,8 @@ u32 __hsiphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key) HPOSTAMBLE } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__hsiphash_aligned); +#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS u32 __hsiphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key) { @@ -461,7 +462,6 @@ u32 __hsiphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, HPOSTAMBLE } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__hsiphash_unaligned); -#endif
/** * hsiphash_1u32 - compute 32-bit hsiphash PRF value of a u32