From: James Smart jsmart2021@gmail.com
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.102 commit f100e758cef51917c517d7e6ddea29c899ccd52c bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I567K6
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
commit efe1dc571a5b808baa26682eef16561be2e356fd upstream.
Contention for the mailbox interface may occur during driver initialization (immediately after a function reset), between mailbox commands initiated via ioctl (bsg) and those driver requested by the driver.
After setting SLI_ACTIVE flag for a port, there is a window in which the driver will allow an ioctl to be initiated while the adapter is initializing and issuing mailbox commands via polling. The polling logic then gets confused.
Correct by having thread setting SLI_ACTIVE spot an active mailbox command and allow it complete before proceeding.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210921143008.64212-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com Co-developed-by: Nigel Kirkland nkirkland2304@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nigel Kirkland nkirkland2304@gmail.com Signed-off-by: James Smart jsmart2021@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Yu Liao liaoyu15@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Wei Li liwei391@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai zhengzengkai@huawei.com --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c index 4587127b67f7..a50f870c5f72 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c @@ -7372,6 +7372,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_hba_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba) struct lpfc_vport *vport = phba->pport; struct lpfc_dmabuf *mp; struct lpfc_rqb *rqbp; + u32 flg;
/* Perform a PCI function reset to start from clean */ rc = lpfc_pci_function_reset(phba); @@ -7385,7 +7386,17 @@ lpfc_sli4_hba_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba) else { spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock); phba->sli.sli_flag |= LPFC_SLI_ACTIVE; + flg = phba->sli.sli_flag; spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock); + /* Allow a little time after setting SLI_ACTIVE for any polled + * MBX commands to complete via BSG. + */ + for (i = 0; i < 50 && (flg & LPFC_SLI_MBOX_ACTIVE); i++) { + msleep(20); + spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock); + flg = phba->sli.sli_flag; + spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock); + } }
lpfc_sli4_dip(phba); @@ -8922,7 +8933,7 @@ lpfc_sli_issue_mbox_s4(struct lpfc_hba *phba, LPFC_MBOXQ_t *mboxq, "(%d):2541 Mailbox command x%x " "(x%x/x%x) failure: " "mqe_sta: x%x mcqe_sta: x%x/x%x " - "Data: x%x x%x\n,", + "Data: x%x x%x\n", mboxq->vport ? mboxq->vport->vpi : 0, mboxq->u.mb.mbxCommand, lpfc_sli_config_mbox_subsys_get(phba, @@ -8956,7 +8967,7 @@ lpfc_sli_issue_mbox_s4(struct lpfc_hba *phba, LPFC_MBOXQ_t *mboxq, "(%d):2597 Sync Mailbox command " "x%x (x%x/x%x) failure: " "mqe_sta: x%x mcqe_sta: x%x/x%x " - "Data: x%x x%x\n,", + "Data: x%x x%x\n", mboxq->vport ? mboxq->vport->vpi : 0, mboxq->u.mb.mbxCommand, lpfc_sli_config_mbox_subsys_get(phba,