From: Johan Almbladh johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
stable inclusion from stable-5.10.67 commit 6a3564739b9f9f0c8df4c0eab3ce888a04e967a4 bugzilla: 182619 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4EWO7
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit 2b7e9f25e590726cca76700ebdb10e92a7a72ca1 ]
Each test case can have a set of sub-tests, where each sub-test can run the cBPF/eBPF test snippet with its own data_size and expected result. Before, the end of the sub-test array was indicated by both data_size and result being zero. However, most or all of the internal eBPF tests has a data_size of zero already. When such a test also had an expected value of zero, the test was never run but reported as PASS anyway.
Now the test runner always runs the first sub-test, regardless of the data_size and result values. The sub-test array zero-termination only applies for any additional sub-tests.
There are other ways fix it of course, but this solution at least removes the surprise of eBPF tests with a zero result always succeeding.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210721103822.3755111-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinet... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Acked-by: Weilong Chen chenweilong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com --- lib/test_bpf.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index ca8eef2f6442..4a9137c8551a 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -6664,7 +6664,14 @@ static int run_one(const struct bpf_prog *fp, struct bpf_test *test) u64 duration; u32 ret;
- if (test->test[i].data_size == 0 && + /* + * NOTE: Several sub-tests may be present, in which case + * a zero {data_size, result} tuple indicates the end of + * the sub-test array. The first test is always run, + * even if both data_size and result happen to be zero. + */ + if (i > 0 && + test->test[i].data_size == 0 && test->test[i].result == 0) break;