From: Taehee Yoo ap420073@gmail.com
stable inclusion from stable-5.10.54 commit 3ae639af362661c6566b326ad8ccf5e561cebf54 bugzilla: 175586 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4DVDU
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit b648eba4c69e5819880b4907e7fcb2bb576069ab ]
To dereference bond->curr_active_slave, it uses rcu_dereference(). But it and the caller doesn't acquire RCU so a warning occurs. So add rcu_read_lock().
Test commands: ip link add dummy0 type dummy ip link add bond0 type bond ip link set dummy0 master bond0 ip link set dummy0 up ip link set bond0 up ip x s add proto esp dst 14.1.1.1 src 15.1.1.1 spi 0x07 \ mode transport \ reqid 0x07 replay-window 32 aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \ 0x44434241343332312423222114131211f4f3f2f1 128 sel \ src 14.0.0.52/24 dst 14.0.0.70/24 proto tcp offload \ dev bond0 dir in
Splat looks like:
============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.13.0-rc3+ #1168 Not tainted ----------------------------- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:411 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ip/684: #0: ffffffff9a2757c0 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x59/0x80 [xfrm_user] 55.191733][ T684] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 684 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #1168 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5 bond_ipsec_add_sa+0x18c/0x1f0 [bonding] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x2a9/0x770 ? memcpy+0x38/0x60 xfrm_add_sa+0x2278/0x3b10 [xfrm_user] ? xfrm_get_policy+0xaa0/0xaa0 [xfrm_user] ? register_lock_class+0x1750/0x1750 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x331/0x660 [xfrm_user] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0 ? xfrm_user_state_lookup.constprop.39+0x320/0x320 [xfrm_user] ? find_held_lock+0x3a/0x1c0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1210/0x1210 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x170 netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 ? xfrm_user_state_lookup.constprop.39+0x320/0x320 [xfrm_user] ? netlink_ack+0x9d0/0x9d0 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x17c/0xa50 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x68/0x80 [xfrm_user] netlink_unicast+0x41c/0x610 ? netlink_attachskb+0x710/0x710 netlink_sendmsg+0x6b9/0xb70 [ ... ]
Fixes: 18cb261afd7b ("bonding: support hardware encryption offload to slaves") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo ap420073@gmail.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Acked-by: Weilong Chen chenweilong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index 345a3f61c723..8bb90e97898d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c @@ -387,10 +387,12 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs) struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev; struct bonding *bond; struct slave *slave; + int err;
if (!bond_dev) return -EINVAL;
+ rcu_read_lock(); bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev); slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave); xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev; @@ -399,10 +401,13 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs) if (!(slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops && slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add)) { slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev, "Slave does not support ipsec offload\n"); + rcu_read_unlock(); return -EINVAL; }
- return slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(xs); + err = slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(xs); + rcu_read_unlock(); + return err; }
/**