From: Omar Sandoval osandov@fb.com
[ Upstream commit e732fe95e4cad35fc1df278c23a32903341b08b3 ]
Currently, reada_start_machine_worker() frees the reada_machine_work and then calls __reada_start_machine() to do readahead. This is another potential instance of the bug in "btrfs: don't prematurely free work in run_ordered_work()".
There _might_ already be a deadlock here: reada_start_machine_worker() can depend on itself through stacked filesystems (__read_start_machine() -> reada_start_machine_dev() -> reada_tree_block_flagged() -> read_extent_buffer_pages() -> submit_one_bio() -> btree_submit_bio_hook() -> btrfs_map_bio() -> submit_stripe_bio() -> submit_bio() onto a loop device can trigger readahead on the lower filesystem).
Either way, let's fix it by freeing the work at the end.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn jthumshirn@suse.de Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval osandov@fb.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com --- fs/btrfs/reada.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reada.c b/fs/btrfs/reada.c index 859274e..4c81ffe 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/reada.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/reada.c @@ -720,21 +720,19 @@ static int reada_start_machine_dev(struct btrfs_device *dev) static void reada_start_machine_worker(struct btrfs_work *work) { struct reada_machine_work *rmw; - struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info; int old_ioprio;
rmw = container_of(work, struct reada_machine_work, work); - fs_info = rmw->fs_info; - - kfree(rmw);
old_ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(task_nice_ioclass(current), task_nice_ioprio(current)); set_task_ioprio(current, BTRFS_IOPRIO_READA); - __reada_start_machine(fs_info); + __reada_start_machine(rmw->fs_info); set_task_ioprio(current, old_ioprio);
- atomic_dec(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt); + atomic_dec(&rmw->fs_info->reada_works_cnt); + + kfree(rmw); }
static void __reada_start_machine(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)