From: Martin KaFai Lau kafai@fb.com
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.88 commit fcf9194d366c5c2e903c4f0f594d6bffbd92da8e bugzilla: 186058 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4QW6A
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit c2fcbf81c332b42382a0c439bfe2414a241e4f5b ]
The libbpf CI reported occasional failure in btf_skc_cls_ingress:
test_syncookie:FAIL:Unexpected syncookie states gen_cookie:80326634 recv_cookie:0 bpf prog error at line 97
"error at line 97" means the bpf prog cannot find the listening socket when the final ack is received. It then skipped processing the syncookie in the final ack which then led to "recv_cookie:0".
The problem is the userspace program did not do accept() and went ahead to close(listen_fd) before the kernel (and the bpf prog) had a chance to process the final ack.
The fix is to add accept() call so that the userspace will wait for the kernel to finish processing the final ack first before close()-ing everything.
Fixes: 9a856cae2217 ("bpf: selftest: Add test_btf_skc_cls_ingress") Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau kafai@fb.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216191630.466151-1-kafai@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai zhengzengkai@huawei.com --- .../bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c index 86ccf37e26b3..d16fd888230a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void print_err_line(void)
static void test_conn(void) { - int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, err; + int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err; socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6); int srv_port;
@@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ static void test_conn(void) if (CHECK_FAIL(cli_fd == -1)) goto done;
+ srv_fd = accept(listen_fd, NULL, NULL); + if (CHECK_FAIL(srv_fd == -1)) + goto done; + if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port || skel->bss->req_sk_sport != srv_port, "Unexpected sk src port", @@ -134,11 +138,13 @@ static void test_conn(void) close(listen_fd); if (cli_fd != -1) close(cli_fd); + if (srv_fd != -1) + close(srv_fd); }
static void test_syncookie(void) { - int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, err; + int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err; socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6); int srv_port;
@@ -161,6 +167,10 @@ static void test_syncookie(void) if (CHECK_FAIL(cli_fd == -1)) goto done;
+ srv_fd = accept(listen_fd, NULL, NULL); + if (CHECK_FAIL(srv_fd == -1)) + goto done; + if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port, "Unexpected tp src port", "listen_tp_sport:%u expected:%u\n", @@ -188,6 +198,8 @@ static void test_syncookie(void) close(listen_fd); if (cli_fd != -1) close(cli_fd); + if (srv_fd != -1) + close(srv_fd); }
struct test {