From: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com
stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.23 commit 82220b1835baaebf4ae2e490f56353a341a09bd2 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9HKBL CVE: CVE-2024-26905
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit e06cc89475eddc1f3a7a4d471524256152c68166 ]
At space_info.c we have several places where we access the ->reserved field of a block reserve without taking the block reserve's spinlock first, which makes KCSAN warn about a data race since that field is always updated while holding the spinlock.
The reports from KCSAN are like the following:
[117.193526] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_block_rsv_release [btrfs] / need_preemptive_reclaim [btrfs]
[117.195148] read to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 6303 on cpu 3: [117.195172] need_preemptive_reclaim+0x222/0x2f0 [btrfs] [117.195992] __reserve_bytes+0xbb0/0xdc8 [btrfs] [117.196807] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x4c/0x120 [btrfs] [117.197620] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x78/0xa8 [btrfs] [117.198434] btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x154/0x368 [btrfs] [117.199300] btrfs_update_inode+0x108/0x1c8 [btrfs] [117.200122] btrfs_dirty_inode+0xb4/0x140 [btrfs] [117.200937] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs] [117.201754] touch_atime+0x16c/0x1e0 [117.201789] filemap_read+0x674/0x728 [117.201823] btrfs_file_read_iter+0xf8/0x410 [btrfs] [117.202653] vfs_read+0x2b6/0x498 [117.203454] ksys_read+0xa2/0x150 [117.203473] __s390x_sys_read+0x68/0x88 [117.203495] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210 [117.203517] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0 [117.203539] system_call+0x70/0x98
[117.203579] write to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 11 on cpu 0: [117.203604] btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x2e8/0x578 [btrfs] [117.204432] btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata+0x7c/0x1d0 [btrfs] [117.205259] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x37c/0x5e0 [btrfs] [117.206093] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x356/0x498 [btrfs] [117.206917] btrfs_work_helper+0x160/0x7a0 [btrfs] [117.207738] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838 [117.207768] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10 [117.207797] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [117.207830] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [117.207861] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
So add a helper to get the reserved amount of a block reserve while holding the lock. The value may be not be up to date anymore when used by need_preemptive_reclaim() and btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(), but that's ok since the worst it can do is cause more reclaim work do be done sooner rather than later. Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
Conflicts: fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h [ The subsequent c7bb26b847e5("btrfs: fix data race at btrfs_use_block_rsv() when accessing block reserve") was merged in earlier. ] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com --- V1->V2: Resolved new conflicts.
fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h index 7e13579f182d..43a9a6b5a79f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h @@ -101,6 +101,22 @@ static inline bool btrfs_block_rsv_full(const struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv) return data_race(rsv->full); }
+/* + * Get the reserved mount of a block reserve in a context where getting a stale + * value is acceptable, instead of accessing it directly and trigger data race + * warning from KCSAN. + */ +static inline u64 btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv) +{ + u64 ret; + + spin_lock(&rsv->lock); + ret = rsv->reserved; + spin_unlock(&rsv->lock); + + return ret; +} + /* * Get the size of a block reserve in a context where getting a stale value is * acceptable, instead of accessing it directly and trigger data race warning diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c index d7e8cd4f140c..3f7a9605e2d3 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, static bool need_preemptive_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct btrfs_space_info *space_info) { - u64 global_rsv_size = fs_info->global_block_rsv.reserved; + const u64 global_rsv_size = btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(&fs_info->global_block_rsv); u64 ordered, delalloc; u64 thresh; u64 used; @@ -937,8 +937,8 @@ static bool need_preemptive_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ordered = percpu_counter_read_positive(&fs_info->ordered_bytes) >> 1; delalloc = percpu_counter_read_positive(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes); if (ordered >= delalloc) - used += fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv.reserved + - fs_info->delayed_block_rsv.reserved; + used += btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(&fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv) + + btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(&fs_info->delayed_block_rsv); else used += space_info->bytes_may_use - global_rsv_size;
@@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static void btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(struct work_struct *work) enum btrfs_flush_state flush; u64 delalloc_size = 0; u64 to_reclaim, block_rsv_size; - u64 global_rsv_size = global_rsv->reserved; + const u64 global_rsv_size = btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(global_rsv);
loops++;
@@ -1165,9 +1165,9 @@ static void btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(struct work_struct *work) * assume it's tied up in delalloc reservations. */ block_rsv_size = global_rsv_size + - delayed_block_rsv->reserved + - delayed_refs_rsv->reserved + - trans_rsv->reserved; + btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_block_rsv) + + btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_refs_rsv) + + btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(trans_rsv); if (block_rsv_size < space_info->bytes_may_use) delalloc_size = space_info->bytes_may_use - block_rsv_size;
@@ -1187,16 +1187,16 @@ static void btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(struct work_struct *work) to_reclaim = delalloc_size; flush = FLUSH_DELALLOC; } else if (space_info->bytes_pinned > - (delayed_block_rsv->reserved + - delayed_refs_rsv->reserved)) { + (btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_block_rsv) + + btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_refs_rsv))) { to_reclaim = space_info->bytes_pinned; flush = COMMIT_TRANS; - } else if (delayed_block_rsv->reserved > - delayed_refs_rsv->reserved) { - to_reclaim = delayed_block_rsv->reserved; + } else if (btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_block_rsv) > + btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_refs_rsv)) { + to_reclaim = btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_block_rsv); flush = FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS_NR; } else { - to_reclaim = delayed_refs_rsv->reserved; + to_reclaim = btrfs_block_rsv_reserved(delayed_refs_rsv); flush = FLUSH_DELAYED_REFS_NR; }
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/6681 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/3...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/6681 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/3...