From: Maciej Żenczykowski maze@google.com
stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.271 commit 63d161f29cd39c050e8873aa36e0c9fc013bb763 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IALIDP CVE: CVE-2023-52894
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
commit c6ec929595c7443250b2a4faea988c62019d5cd2 upstream.
In Google internal bug 265639009 we've received an (as yet) unreproducible crash report from an aarch64 GKI 5.10.149-android13 running device.
AFAICT the source code is at: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/refs/tags/ASB-2022-12-05_13...
The call stack is: ncm_close() -> ncm_notify() -> ncm_do_notify() with the crash at: ncm_do_notify+0x98/0x270 Code: 79000d0b b9000a6c f940012a f9400269 (b9405d4b)
Which I believe disassembles to (I don't know ARM assembly, but it looks sane enough to me...):
// halfword (16-bit) store presumably to event->wLength (at offset 6 of struct usb_cdc_notification) 0B 0D 00 79 strh w11, [x8, #6]
// word (32-bit) store presumably to req->Length (at offset 8 of struct usb_request) 6C 0A 00 B9 str w12, [x19, #8]
// x10 (NULL) was read here from offset 0 of valid pointer x9 // IMHO we're reading 'cdev->gadget' and getting NULL // gadget is indeed at offset 0 of struct usb_composite_dev 2A 01 40 F9 ldr x10, [x9]
// loading req->buf pointer, which is at offset 0 of struct usb_request 69 02 40 F9 ldr x9, [x19]
// x10 is null, crash, appears to be attempt to read cdev->gadget->max_speed 4B 5D 40 B9 ldr w11, [x10, #0x5c]
which seems to line up with ncm_do_notify() case NCM_NOTIFY_SPEED code fragment:
event->wLength = cpu_to_le16(8); req->length = NCM_STATUS_BYTECOUNT;
/* SPEED_CHANGE data is up/down speeds in bits/sec */ data = req->buf + sizeof *event; data[0] = cpu_to_le32(ncm_bitrate(cdev->gadget));
My analysis of registers and NULL ptr deref crash offset (Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000000000005c) heavily suggests that the crash is due to 'cdev->gadget' being NULL when executing: data[0] = cpu_to_le32(ncm_bitrate(cdev->gadget)); which calls: ncm_bitrate(NULL) which then calls: gadget_is_superspeed(NULL) which reads ((struct usb_gadget *)NULL)->max_speed and hits a panic.
AFAICT, if I'm counting right, the offset of max_speed is indeed 0x5C. (remember there's a GKI KABI reservation of 16 bytes in struct work_struct)
It's not at all clear to me how this is all supposed to work... but returning 0 seems much better than panic-ing...
Cc: Felipe Balbi balbi@kernel.org Cc: Lorenzo Colitti lorenzo@google.com Cc: Carlos Llamas cmllamas@google.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski maze@google.com Cc: stable stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230117131839.1138208-1-maze@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Conflicts: drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c [Context conflict] Signed-off-by: Wang Hai wanghai38@huawei.com --- drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c index 3da7e6511fc6..6031e96cf351 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c @@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ static inline struct f_ncm *func_to_ncm(struct usb_function *f) /* peak (theoretical) bulk transfer rate in bits-per-second */ static inline unsigned ncm_bitrate(struct usb_gadget *g) { - if (gadget_is_superspeed(g) && g->speed == USB_SPEED_SUPER) + if (!g) + return 0; + else if (gadget_is_superspeed(g) && g->speed == USB_SPEED_SUPER) return 13 * 1024 * 8 * 1000 * 8; else if (gadget_is_dualspeed(g) && g->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH) return 13 * 512 * 8 * 1000 * 8;
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/11404 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/3...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/11404 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/3...