From: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.8-rc2 commit 4759ff71f23e1a9cba001009abab68cde6dc327a category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IAZ996 CVE: NA

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...

--------------------------------

After commit 978ffcbf00d8 ("execve: open the executable file before doing anything else"), current->in_execve was no longer in sync with the open(). This broke AppArmor and TOMOYO which depend on this flag to distinguish "open" operations from being "exec" operations.

Instead of moving around in_execve, switch to using __FMODE_EXEC, which is where the "is this an exec?" intent is stored. Note that TOMOYO still uses in_execve around cred handling.

Reported-by: Kevin Locke kevin@kevinlocke.name Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZbE4qn9_h14OqADK@kevinlocke.name Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Fixes: 978ffcbf00d8 ("execve: open the executable file before doing anything else") Cc: Josh Triplett josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: John Johansen john.johansen@canonical.com Cc: Paul Moore paul@paul-moore.com Cc: James Morris jmorris@namei.org Cc: Serge E. Hallyn serge@hallyn.com Cc: Kentaro Takeda takedakn@nttdata.co.jp Cc: Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Cc: Alexander Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: Christian Brauner brauner@kernel.org Cc: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Cc: Eric Biederman ebiederm@xmission.com Cc: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Gu Bowen gubowen5@huawei.com --- security/apparmor/lsm.c | 4 +++- security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c index 5303a51eff9c..56cd03fa8086 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c @@ -461,8 +461,10 @@ static int apparmor_file_open(struct file *file) * Cache permissions granted by the previous exec check, with * implicit read and executable mmap which are required to * actually execute the image. + * + * Illogically, FMODE_EXEC is in f_flags, not f_mode. */ - if (current->in_execve) { + if (file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) { fctx->allow = MAY_EXEC | MAY_READ | AA_EXEC_MMAP; return 0; } diff --git a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c index 298d182759c2..db1fefbd66de 100644 --- a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c +++ b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c @@ -327,7 +327,8 @@ static int tomoyo_file_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, static int tomoyo_file_open(struct file *f) { /* Don't check read permission here if called from execve(). */ - if (current->in_execve) + /* Illogically, FMODE_EXEC is in f_flags, not f_mode. */ + if (f->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) return 0; return tomoyo_check_open_permission(tomoyo_domain(), &f->f_path, f->f_flags);

From: Mickaël Salaün mic@digikod.net

maillist inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IAZ996 CVE: NA

Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241011184422.977903-2-mic@digikod.net/

--------------------------------

Add a new AT_CHECK flag to execveat(2) to check if a file would be allowed for execution. The main use case is for script interpreters and dynamic linkers to check execution permission according to the kernel's security policy. Another use case is to add context to access logs e.g., which script (instead of interpreter) accessed a file. As any executable code, scripts could also use this check [1].

This is different from faccessat(2) + X_OK which only checks a subset of access rights (i.e. inode permission and mount options for regular files), but not the full context (e.g. all LSM access checks). The main use case for access(2) is for SUID processes to (partially) check access on behalf of their caller. The main use case for execveat(2) + AT_CHECK is to check if a script execution would be allowed, according to all the different restrictions in place. Because the use of AT_CHECK follows the exact kernel semantic as for a real execution, user space gets the same error codes.

An interesting point of using execveat(2) instead of openat2(2) is that it decouples the check from the enforcement. Indeed, the security check can be logged (e.g. with audit) without blocking an execution environment not yet ready to enforce a strict security policy.

LSMs can control or log execution requests with security_bprm_creds_for_exec(). However, to enforce a consistent and complete access control (e.g. on binary's dependencies) LSMs should restrict file executability, or mesure executed files, with security_file_open() by checking file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC.

Because AT_CHECK is dedicated to user space interpreters, it doesn't make sense for the kernel to parse the checked files, look for interpreters known to the kernel (e.g. ELF, shebang), and return ENOEXEC if the format is unknown. Because of that, security_bprm_check() is never called when AT_CHECK is used.

It should be noted that script interpreters cannot directly use execveat(2) (without this new AT_CHECK flag) because this could lead to unexpected behaviors e.g., `python script.sh` could lead to Bash being executed to interpret the script. Unlike the kernel, script interpreters may just interpret the shebang as a simple comment, which should not change for backward compatibility reasons.

Because scripts or libraries files might not currently have the executable permission set, or because we might want specific users to be allowed to run arbitrary scripts, the following patch provides a dynamic configuration mechanism with the SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE and SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE securebits.

This is a redesign of the CLIP OS 4's O_MAYEXEC: https://github.com/clipos-archive/src_platform_clip-patches/blob/f5cb330d6b6... This patch has been used for more than a decade with customized script interpreters. Some examples can be found here: https://github.com/clipos-archive/clipos4_portage-overlay/search?q=O_MAYEXEC

Cc: Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: Christian Brauner brauner@kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org Cc: Paul Moore paul@paul-moore.com Cc: Serge Hallyn serge@hallyn.com Link: https://docs.python.org/3/library/io.html#io.open_code [1] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün mic@digikod.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241011184422.977903-2-mic@digikod.net Conflicts: include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h [Context conflicts] Signed-off-by: Gu Bowen gubowen5@huawei.com --- fs/exec.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/binfmts.h | 7 ++++++- include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/audit.h | 1 + kernel/auditsc.c | 1 + security/security.c | 10 ++++++++++ 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index ea6cec95c7c3..38a78e88d5bf 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ static struct file *do_open_execat(int fd, struct filename *name, int flags) .lookup_flags = LOOKUP_FOLLOW, };

- if ((flags & ~(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH)) != 0) + if ((flags & ~(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_CHECK)) != 0) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); if (flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) open_exec_flags.lookup_flags &= ~LOOKUP_FOLLOW; @@ -1539,6 +1539,20 @@ static struct linux_binprm *alloc_bprm(int fd, struct filename *filename, int fl } bprm->interp = bprm->filename;

+ /* + * At this point, security_file_open() has already been called (with + * __FMODE_EXEC) and access control checks for AT_CHECK will stop just + * after the security_bprm_creds_for_exec() call in bprm_execve(). + * Indeed, the kernel should not try to parse the content of the file + * with exec_binprm() nor change the calling thread, which means that + * the following security functions will be not called: + * - security_bprm_check() + * - security_bprm_creds_from_file() + * - security_bprm_committing_creds() + * - security_bprm_committed_creds() + */ + bprm->is_check = !!(flags & AT_CHECK); + retval = bprm_mm_init(bprm); if (!retval) return bprm; @@ -1842,7 +1856,7 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm)

/* Set the unchanging part of bprm->cred */ retval = security_bprm_creds_for_exec(bprm); - if (retval) + if (retval || bprm->is_check) goto out;

retval = exec_binprm(bprm); diff --git a/include/linux/binfmts.h b/include/linux/binfmts.h index 8d51f69f9f5e..330b194b66e7 100644 --- a/include/linux/binfmts.h +++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h @@ -42,7 +42,12 @@ struct linux_binprm { * Set when errors can no longer be returned to the * original userspace. */ - point_of_no_return:1; + point_of_no_return:1, + /* + * Set by user space to check executability according to the + * caller's environment. + */ + is_check:1; struct file *executable; /* Executable to pass to the interpreter */ struct file *interpreter; struct file *file; diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h index 282e90aeb163..f368112f343b 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h @@ -116,6 +116,37 @@ #define AT_HANDLE_FID AT_REMOVEDIR /* file handle is needed to compare object identity and may not be usable to open_by_handle_at(2) */ +/* + * AT_CHECK only performs a check on a regular file and returns 0 if execution + * of this file would be allowed, ignoring the file format and then the related + * interpreter dependencies (e.g. ELF libraries, script's shebang). + * + * Programs should always perform this check to apply kernel-level checks + * against files that are not directly executed by the kernel but passed to a + * user space interpreter instead. All files that contain executable code, + * from the point of view of the interpreter, should be checked. However the + * result of this check should only be enforced according to + * SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE or SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE. See securebits.h + * documentation and the samples/check-exec/inc.c example. + * + * The main purpose of this flag is to improve the security and consistency of + * an execution environment to ensure that direct file execution (e.g. + * `./script.sh`) and indirect file execution (e.g. `sh script.sh`) lead to the + * same result. For instance, this can be used to check if a file is + * trustworthy according to the caller's environment. + * + * In a secure environment, libraries and any executable dependencies should + * also be checked. For instance, dynamic linking should make sure that all + * libraries are allowed for execution to avoid trivial bypass (e.g. using + * LD_PRELOAD). For such secure execution environment to make sense, only + * trusted code should be executable, which also requires integrity guarantees. + * + * To avoid race conditions leading to time-of-check to time-of-use issues, + * AT_CHECK should be used with AT_EMPTY_PATH to check against a file + * descriptor instead of a path. + */ +#define AT_CHECK 0x10000 + #if defined(__KERNEL__) #define AT_GETATTR_NOSEC 0x80000000 #endif diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h index 457ca207e08a..ab718ac899a2 100644 --- a/kernel/audit.h +++ b/kernel/audit.h @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ struct audit_context { struct open_how openat2; struct { int argc; + bool is_check; } execve; struct { char *name; diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c index 6f0d6fb6523f..b6316e284342 100644 --- a/kernel/auditsc.c +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c @@ -2662,6 +2662,7 @@ void __audit_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)

context->type = AUDIT_EXECVE; context->execve.argc = bprm->argc; + context->execve.is_check = bprm->is_check; }

diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index b6144833c7a8..830d099986cc 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -1053,6 +1053,12 @@ int security_vm_enough_memory_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages) * to 1 if AT_SECURE should be set to request libc enable secure mode. @bprm * contains the linux_binprm structure. * + * If execveat(2) is called with the AT_CHECK flag, bprm->is_check is set. The + * result must be the same as without this flag even if the execution will + * never really happen and @bprm will always be dropped. + * + * This hook must not change current->cred, only @bprm->cred. + * * Return: Returns 0 if the hook is successful and permission is granted. */ int security_bprm_creds_for_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm) @@ -2845,6 +2851,10 @@ int security_file_receive(struct file *file) * Save open-time permission checking state for later use upon file_permission, * and recheck access if anything has changed since inode_permission. * + * We can check if a file is opened for execution (e.g. execve(2) call), either + * directly or indirectly (e.g. ELF's ld.so) by checking file->f_flags & + * __FMODE_EXEC . + * * Return: Returns 0 if permission is granted. */ int security_file_open(struct file *file)

hulk inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IAZ996 CVE: NA

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Since struct audit_context and linux_binprm contains hole at the end, we can directly add one list without breaking KABI.

Signed-off-by: Gu Bowen gubowen5@huawei.com --- include/linux/binfmts.h | 12 ++++++------ kernel/audit.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/binfmts.h b/include/linux/binfmts.h index 330b194b66e7..19f31d4783e9 100644 --- a/include/linux/binfmts.h +++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h @@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ struct linux_binprm { * Set when errors can no longer be returned to the * original userspace. */ - point_of_no_return:1, - /* - * Set by user space to check executability according to the - * caller's environment. - */ - is_check:1; + point_of_no_return:1; + /* + * Set by user space to check executability according to the + * caller's environment. + */ + KABI_FILL_HOLE(unsigned int is_check:1) struct file *executable; /* Executable to pass to the interpreter */ struct file *interpreter; struct file *file; diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h index ab718ac899a2..5b970fce9032 100644 --- a/kernel/audit.h +++ b/kernel/audit.h @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ struct audit_context { struct open_how openat2; struct { int argc; - bool is_check; + KABI_FILL_HOLE(bool is_check) } execve; struct { char *name;