From: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.8-rc6 commit 52f671db18823089a02f07efc04efdb2272ddc17 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9E2LT CVE: CVE-2024-26740
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
--------------------------------
The test Davide added in commit ca22da2fbd69 ("act_mirred: use the backlog for nested calls to mirred ingress") hangs our testing VMs every 10 or so runs, with the familiar tcp_v4_rcv -> tcp_v4_rcv deadlock reported by lockdep.
The problem as previously described by Davide (see Link) is that if we reverse flow of traffic with the redirect (egress -> ingress) we may reach the same socket which generated the packet. And we may still be holding its socket lock. The common solution to such deadlocks is to put the packet in the Rx backlog, rather than run the Rx path inline. Do that for all egress -> ingress reversals, not just once we started to nest mirred calls.
In the past there was a concern that the backlog indirection will lead to loss of error reporting / less accurate stats. But the current workaround does not seem to address the issue.
Fixes: 53592b364001 ("net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress actions") Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner marcelo.leitner@gmail.com Suggested-by: Davide Caratti dcaratti@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/33dc43f587ec1388ba456b4915c75f02a8aae226.1663... Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim jhs@mojatatu.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net
Conflicts: net/sched/act_mirred.c
Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao shaozhengchao@huawei.com --- net/sched/act_mirred.c | 14 +++++--------- .../testing/selftests/net/forwarding/tc_actions.sh | 3 --- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/act_mirred.c b/net/sched/act_mirred.c index 91a19460cb57..66c9f356a876 100644 --- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c +++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c @@ -206,18 +206,14 @@ static int tcf_mirred_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, return err; }
-static bool is_mirred_nested(void) -{ - return unlikely(__this_cpu_read(mirred_nest_level) > 1); -} - -static int tcf_mirred_forward(bool want_ingress, struct sk_buff *skb) +static int +tcf_mirred_forward(bool at_ingress, bool want_ingress, struct sk_buff *skb) { int err;
if (!want_ingress) err = dev_queue_xmit(skb); - else if (is_mirred_nested()) + else if (!at_ingress) err = netif_rx(skb); else err = netif_receive_skb(skb); @@ -314,7 +310,7 @@ static int tcf_mirred_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a, /* let's the caller reinsert the packet, if possible */ if (use_reinsert) { res->ingress = want_ingress; - err = tcf_mirred_forward(res->ingress, skb); + err = tcf_mirred_forward(at_ingress, res->ingress, skb); if (err) tcf_action_inc_overlimit_qstats(&m->common); __this_cpu_dec(mirred_nest_level); @@ -322,7 +318,7 @@ static int tcf_mirred_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a, } }
- err = tcf_mirred_forward(want_ingress, skb2); + err = tcf_mirred_forward(at_ingress, want_ingress, skb2); if (err) { out: tcf_action_inc_overlimit_qstats(&m->common); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/tc_actions.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/tc_actions.sh index e396e24d30e0..d6614faf9fe3 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/tc_actions.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/tc_actions.sh @@ -188,9 +188,6 @@ mirred_egress_to_ingress_tcp_test() check_err $? "didn't mirred redirect ICMP" tc_check_packets "dev $h1 ingress" 102 10 check_err $? "didn't drop mirred ICMP" - local overlimits=$(tc_rule_stats_get ${h1} 101 egress .overlimits) - test ${overlimits} = 10 - check_err $? "wrong overlimits, expected 10 got ${overlimits}"
tc filter del dev $h1 egress protocol ip pref 100 handle 100 flower tc filter del dev $h1 egress protocol ip pref 101 handle 101 flower
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/6020 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/7...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/6020 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/7...