From: Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.212 commit 882a51a10ecf24ce135d573afa0872aef02c5125 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9Q8N8 CVE: CVE-2024-27414
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit 743ad091fb46e622f1b690385bb15e3cd3daf874 ]
In the commit d73ef2d69c0d ("rtnetlink: let rtnl_bridge_setlink checks IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE length"), an adjustment was made to the old loop logic in the function `rtnl_bridge_setlink` to enable the loop to also check the length of the IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE attribute. However, this adjustment removed the `break` statement and led to an error logic of the flags writing back at the end of this function.
if (have_flags) memcpy(nla_data(attr), &flags, sizeof(flags)); // attr should point to IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS NLA !!!
Before the mentioned commit, the `attr` is granted to be IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS. However, this is not necessarily true fow now as the updated loop will let the attr point to the last NLA, even an invalid NLA which could cause overflow writes.
This patch introduces a new variable `br_flag` to save the NLA pointer that points to IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS and uses it to resolve the mentioned error logic.
Fixes: d73ef2d69c0d ("rtnetlink: let rtnl_bridge_setlink checks IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE length") Signed-off-by: Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov razor@blackwall.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227121128.608110-1-linma@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan william.xuanziyang@huawei.com --- net/core/rtnetlink.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c index 6dcb3c1f147f..0a9a923b226a 100644 --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c @@ -4889,10 +4889,9 @@ static int rtnl_bridge_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk); struct ifinfomsg *ifm; struct net_device *dev; - struct nlattr *br_spec, *attr = NULL; + struct nlattr *br_spec, *attr, *br_flags_attr = NULL; int rem, err = -EOPNOTSUPP; u16 flags = 0; - bool have_flags = false;
if (nlmsg_len(nlh) < sizeof(*ifm)) return -EINVAL; @@ -4910,11 +4909,11 @@ static int rtnl_bridge_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, br_spec = nlmsg_find_attr(nlh, sizeof(struct ifinfomsg), IFLA_AF_SPEC); if (br_spec) { nla_for_each_nested(attr, br_spec, rem) { - if (nla_type(attr) == IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS && !have_flags) { + if (nla_type(attr) == IFLA_BRIDGE_FLAGS && !br_flags_attr) { if (nla_len(attr) < sizeof(flags)) return -EINVAL;
- have_flags = true; + br_flags_attr = attr; flags = nla_get_u16(attr); }
@@ -4958,8 +4957,8 @@ static int rtnl_bridge_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, } }
- if (have_flags) - memcpy(nla_data(attr), &flags, sizeof(flags)); + if (br_flags_attr) + memcpy(nla_data(br_flags_attr), &flags, sizeof(flags)); out: return err; }
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/8555 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/J...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/8555 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/J...