From: Edward Adam Davis eadavis@qq.com

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.10-rc7 commit 89e856e124f9ae548572c56b1b70c2255705f8fe category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAGEK1 CVE: CVE-2024-41062

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...

-------------------------------------------

The problem occurs between the system call to close the sock and hci_rx_work, where the former releases the sock and the latter accesses it without lock protection.

CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- sock_close hci_rx_work l2cap_sock_release hci_acldata_packet l2cap_sock_kill l2cap_recv_frame sk_free l2cap_conless_channel l2cap_sock_recv_cb

If hci_rx_work processes the data that needs to be received before the sock is closed, then everything is normal; Otherwise, the work thread may access the released sock when receiving data.

Add a chan mutex in the rx callback of the sock to achieve synchronization between the sock release and recv cb.

Sock is dead, so set chan data to NULL, avoid others use invalid sock pointer.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+b7f6f8c9303466e16c8a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis eadavis@qq.com Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz luiz.von.dentz@intel.com

Conflicts: net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c [The conflict occurs because the commit 89e856e124f9("bluetooth/l2cap: sync sock recv cb and release") is not merged] Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao shaozhengchao@huawei.com --- net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c index 13afdc599b58..409475da9283 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c @@ -1238,6 +1238,10 @@ static void l2cap_sock_kill(struct sock *sk)

BT_DBG("sk %p state %s", sk, state_to_string(sk->sk_state));

+ /* Sock is dead, so set chan data to NULL, avoid other task use invalid + * sock pointer. + */ + l2cap_pi(sk)->chan->data = NULL; /* Kill poor orphan */

l2cap_chan_put(l2cap_pi(sk)->chan); @@ -1480,9 +1484,21 @@ static struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan)

static int l2cap_sock_recv_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct sk_buff *skb) { - struct sock *sk = chan->data; + struct sock *sk; int err;

+ /* To avoid race with sock_release, a chan lock needs to be added here + * to synchronize the sock. + */ + l2cap_chan_hold(chan); + l2cap_chan_lock(chan); + sk = chan->data; + if (!sk) { + l2cap_chan_unlock(chan); + l2cap_chan_put(chan); + return -ENXIO; + } + lock_sock(sk);

if (l2cap_pi(sk)->rx_busy_skb) { @@ -1519,6 +1535,8 @@ static int l2cap_sock_recv_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)

done: release_sock(sk); + l2cap_chan_unlock(chan); + l2cap_chan_put(chan);

return err; }