From: Seunghun Han kkamagui@gmail.com

hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: 180974 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4DDEL CVE: CVE-2017-13694

-------------------------------------------------

I'm Seunghun Han, and I work for National Security Research Institute of South Korea.

I have been doing a research on ACPI and found an ACPI cache leak in ACPI early abort cases.

Boot log of ACPI cache leak is as follows: [ 0.352414] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device) [ 0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device) [ 0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions) [ 0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device) [ 0.356028] ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter [ 0.356799] ACPI Error: Could not remove SCI handler (20170303/evmisc-281) [ 0.360215] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-State: Slab cache still has objects [ 0.360648] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #10 [ 0.361273] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 0.361873] Call Trace: [ 0.362243] ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81 [ 0.362591] ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0 [ 0.362944] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27 [ 0.363296] ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10 [ 0.363646] ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x6d/0x7b [ 0.364000] ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14 [ 0.364000] ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f [ 0.364000] ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80 [ 0.364000] ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f [ 0.364000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27 [ 0.364000] ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0 [ 0.364000] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a [ 0.364000] ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0 [ 0.364000] ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100 [ 0.364000] ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30

I analyzed this memory leak in detail. I found that “Acpi-State” cache and “Acpi-Parse” cache were merged because the size of cache objects was same slab cache size.

I finally found “Acpi-Parse” cache and “Acpi-ParseExt” cache were leaked using SLAB_NEVER_MERGE flag in kmem_cache_create() function.

Real ACPI cache leak point is as follows: [ 0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device) [ 0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device) [ 0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions) [ 0.361043] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device) [ 0.364016] ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter [ 0.365061] ACPI Error: Could not remove SCI handler (20170303/evmisc-281) [ 0.368174] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-Parse: Slab cache still has objects [ 0.369332] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #8 [ 0.371256] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 0.372000] Call Trace: [ 0.372000] ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81 [ 0.372000] ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0 [ 0.372000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27 [ 0.372000] ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10 [ 0.372000] ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x56/0x7b [ 0.372000] ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14 [ 0.372000] ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f [ 0.372000] ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80 [ 0.372000] ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f [ 0.372000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27 [ 0.372000] ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0 [ 0.372000] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a [ 0.372000] ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0 [ 0.372000] ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100 [ 0.372000] ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 [ 0.388039] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-ParseExt: Slab cache still has objects [ 0.389063] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #8 [ 0.390557] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 0.392000] Call Trace: [ 0.392000] ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81 [ 0.392000] ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0 [ 0.392000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27 [ 0.392000] ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10 [ 0.392000] ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x6d/0x7b [ 0.392000] ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14 [ 0.392000] ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f [ 0.392000] ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80 [ 0.392000] ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f [ 0.392000] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27 [ 0.392000] ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0 [ 0.392000] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a [ 0.392000] ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0 [ 0.392000] ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100 [ 0.392000] ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30

When early abort is occurred due to invalid ACPI information, Linux kernel terminates ACPI by calling acpi_terminate() function. The function calls acpi_ut_delete_caches() function to delete local caches (acpi_gbl_namespace_ cache, state_cache, operand_cache, ps_node_cache, ps_node_ext_cache).

But the deletion codes in acpi_ut_delete_caches() function only delete slab caches using kmem_cache_destroy() function, therefore the cache objects should be flushed before acpi_ut_delete_caches() function.

“Acpi-Parse” cache and “Acpi-ParseExt” cache are used in an AML parse function, acpi_ps_parse_loop(). The function should have flush codes to handle an error state due to invalid AML codes.

This cache leak has a security threat because an old kernel (<= 4.9) shows memory locations of kernel functions in stack dump. Some malicious users could use this information to neutralize kernel ASLR.

To fix ACPI cache leak for enhancing security, I made a patch which has flush codes in acpi_ps_parse_loop() function.

I hope that this patch improves the security of Linux kernel.

Thank you.

Signed-off-by: Seunghun Han kkamagui@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo guohanjun@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo guohanjun@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Chen Jun chenjun102@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai zhengzengkai@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c | 53 ++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c index 54471083ba54..a22d5c0008d6 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c @@ -636,7 +636,8 @@ acpi_status acpi_ps_complete_final_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state, union acpi_parse_object *op, acpi_status status) { - acpi_status status2; + acpi_status return_status = AE_OK; + u8 ascending = TRUE;

ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE_PTR(ps_complete_final_op, walk_state);

@@ -650,7 +651,8 @@ acpi_ps_complete_final_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state, op)); do { if (op) { - if (walk_state->ascending_callback != NULL) { + if (ascending && + walk_state->ascending_callback != NULL) { walk_state->op = op; walk_state->op_info = acpi_ps_get_opcode_info(op->common. @@ -672,49 +674,26 @@ acpi_ps_complete_final_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state, }

if (status == AE_CTRL_TERMINATE) { - status = AE_OK; - - /* Clean up */ - do { - if (op) { - status2 = - acpi_ps_complete_this_op - (walk_state, op); - if (ACPI_FAILURE - (status2)) { - return_ACPI_STATUS - (status2); - } - } - - acpi_ps_pop_scope(& - (walk_state-> - parser_state), - &op, - &walk_state-> - arg_types, - &walk_state-> - arg_count); - - } while (op); - - return_ACPI_STATUS(status); + ascending = FALSE; + return_status = AE_CTRL_TERMINATE; }

else if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {

/* First error is most important */

- (void) - acpi_ps_complete_this_op(walk_state, - op); - return_ACPI_STATUS(status); + ascending = FALSE; + return_status = status; } }

- status2 = acpi_ps_complete_this_op(walk_state, op); - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status2)) { - return_ACPI_STATUS(status2); + status = acpi_ps_complete_this_op(walk_state, op); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { + ascending = FALSE; + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(return_status) || + return_status == AE_CTRL_TERMINATE) { + return_status = status; + } } }

@@ -724,5 +703,5 @@ acpi_ps_complete_final_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,

} while (op);

- return_ACPI_STATUS(status); + return_ACPI_STATUS(return_status); }