From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.13-rc1 commit cb4158ce8ec8a5bb528cc1693356a5eb8058094d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEDPP CVE: CVE-2024-56702

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...

--------------------------------

Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this issue is available in [0].

Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL, causing explicit NULL checks to be deleted, and accesses to such pointers potentially crashing the kernel.

To fix this, mark raw_tp arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL, and then special case the dereference and pointer arithmetic to permit it, and allow passing them into helpers/kfuncs; these exceptions are made for raw_tp programs only. Ensure that we don't do this when ref_obj_id > 0, as in that case this is an acquired object and doesn't need such adjustment.

The reason we do mask_raw_tp_trusted_reg logic is because other will recheck in places whether the register is a trusted_reg, and then consider our register as untrusted when detecting the presence of the PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag.

To allow safe dereference, we enable PROBE_MEM marking when we see loads into trusted pointers with PTR_MAYBE_NULL.

While trusted raw_tp arguments can also be passed into helpers or kfuncs where such broken assumption may cause issues, a future patch set will tackle their case separately, as PTR_TO_BTF_ID (without PTR_TRUSTED) can already be passed into helpers and causes similar problems. Thus, they are left alone for now.

It is possible that these checks also permit passing non-raw_tp args that are trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID with null marking. In such a case, allowing dereference when pointer is NULL expands allowed behavior, so won't regress existing programs, and the case of passing these into helpers is the same as above and will be dealt with later.

Also update the failure case in tp_btf_nullable selftest to capture the new behavior, as the verifier will no longer cause an error when directly dereference a raw tracepoint argument marked as __nullable.

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrCZS6nisraEqehw@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.c...

Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa jolsa@kernel.org Reported-by: Juri Lelli juri.lelli@redhat.com Tested-by: Juri Lelli juri.lelli@redhat.com Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104171959.2938862-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Conflicts: kernel/bpf/btf.c include/linux/bpf.h kernel/bpf/verifier.c tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tp_btf_nullable.c [The conflicts were due to not merge commit e2b3c4ff5d18 and 2060f07f861a2] Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui pulehui@huawei.com --- include/linux/bpf.h | 6 ++++ kernel/bpf/btf.c | 4 +++ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 73ef8dda7ada..7e7a2507a3e5 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -3322,4 +3322,10 @@ static inline gfp_t bpf_memcg_flags(gfp_t flags) return flags; }

+static inline bool bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(const struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ + return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING && + prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP; +} + #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index 7a82194ad51d..a54a7fdf99cd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -6076,6 +6076,10 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, if (prog_args_trusted(prog)) info->reg_type |= PTR_TRUSTED;

+ /* Raw tracepoint arguments always get marked as maybe NULL */ + if (bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(prog)) + info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; + if (tgt_prog) { enum bpf_prog_type tgt_type;

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 8fa7b37152c0..fe0c8bf97663 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -495,6 +495,25 @@ static struct btf_record *reg_btf_record(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) return rec; }

+static bool mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { + return reg->type == (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED | PTR_MAYBE_NULL) && + bpf_prog_is_raw_tp(env->prog) && !reg->ref_obj_id; +} + +static bool mask_raw_tp_reg(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + if (!mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(env, reg)) + return false; + reg->type &= ~PTR_MAYBE_NULL; + return true; +} + +static void unmask_raw_tp_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, bool result) +{ + if (result) + reg->type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; +} + static bool subprog_is_global(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog) { struct bpf_func_info_aux *aux = env->prog->aux->func_info_aux; @@ -6458,6 +6477,7 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const char *field_name = NULL; enum bpf_type_flag flag = 0; u32 btf_id = 0; + bool mask; int ret;

if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) { @@ -6529,7 +6549,21 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,

if (ret < 0) return ret; - + /* For raw_tp progs, we allow dereference of PTR_MAYBE_NULL + * trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID, these are the ones that are possibly + * arguments to the raw_tp. Since internal checks in for trusted + * reg in check_ptr_to_btf_access would consider PTR_MAYBE_NULL + * modifier as problematic, mask it out temporarily for the + * check. Don't apply this to pointers with ref_obj_id > 0, as + * those won't be raw_tp args. + * + * We may end up applying this relaxation to other trusted + * PTR_TO_BTF_ID with maybe null flag, since we cannot + * distinguish PTR_MAYBE_NULL tagged for arguments vs normal + * tagging, but that should expand allowed behavior, and not + * cause regression for existing behavior. + */ + mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); if (ret != PTR_TO_BTF_ID) { /* just mark; */

@@ -6590,8 +6624,13 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, clear_trusted_flags(&flag); }

- if (atype == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) + if (atype == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) { mark_btf_ld_reg(env, regs, value_regno, ret, reg->btf, btf_id, flag); + /* We've assigned a new type to regno, so don't undo masking. */ + if (regno == value_regno) + mask = false; + } + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);

return 0; } @@ -6963,7 +7002,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); } else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID && - !type_may_be_null(reg->type)) { + (mask_raw_tp_reg_cond(env, reg) || !type_may_be_null(reg->type))) { err = check_ptr_to_btf_access(env, regs, regno, off, size, t, value_regno); } else if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) { @@ -8515,6 +8554,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, enum bpf_reg_type type = reg->type; u32 *arg_btf_id = NULL; int err = 0; + bool mask;

if (arg_type == ARG_DONTCARE) return 0; @@ -8555,11 +8595,11 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, base_type(arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK) arg_btf_id = fn->arg_btf_id[arg];

+ mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); err = check_reg_type(env, regno, arg_type, arg_btf_id, meta); - if (err) - return err;

- err = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type); + err = err ?: check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type); + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); if (err) return err;

@@ -11366,6 +11406,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ enum bpf_arg_type arg_type = ARG_DONTCARE; u32 regno = i + 1, ref_id, type_size; bool is_ret_buf_sz = false; + bool mask = false; int kf_arg_type;

t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL); @@ -11424,11 +11465,14 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ return -EINVAL; }

+ mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); if ((is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta) || is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) && (register_is_null(reg) || type_may_be_null(reg->type))) { verbose(env, "Possibly NULL pointer passed to trusted arg%d\n", i); + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return -EACCES; } + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask);

if (reg->ref_obj_id) { if (is_kfunc_release(meta) && meta->ref_obj_id) { @@ -11455,17 +11499,24 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ if (!is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta) && !is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) break;

+ /* Allow passing maybe NULL raw_tp arguments to + * kfuncs for compatibility. Don't apply this to + * arguments with ref_obj_id > 0. + */ + mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); if (!is_trusted_reg(reg)) { if (!is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) { verbose(env, "R%d must be referenced or trusted\n", regno); + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return -EINVAL; } if (!is_rcu_reg(reg)) { verbose(env, "R%d must be a rcu pointer\n", regno); + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return -EINVAL; } } - + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); fallthrough; case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CTX: /* Trusted arguments have the same offset checks as release arguments */ @@ -11490,7 +11541,9 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_

if (is_kfunc_release(meta) && reg->ref_obj_id) arg_type |= OBJ_RELEASE; + mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); ret = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, regno, arg_type); + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); if (ret < 0) return ret;

@@ -11651,6 +11704,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ return ret; break; case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID: + mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, reg); /* Only base_type is checked, further checks are done here */ if ((base_type(reg->type) != PTR_TO_BTF_ID || (bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(reg->type) && !is_rcu_reg(reg))) && @@ -11659,9 +11713,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ verbose(env, "expected %s or socket\n", reg_type_str(env, base_type(reg->type) | (type_flag(reg->type) & BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS))); + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); return -EINVAL; } ret = process_kf_arg_ptr_to_btf_id(env, reg, ref_t, ref_tname, ref_id, meta, i); + unmask_raw_tp_reg(reg, mask); if (ret < 0) return ret; break; @@ -12548,7 +12604,7 @@ static int sanitize_check_bounds(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, */ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, - const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, + struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg) { struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state; @@ -12562,6 +12618,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_sanitize_info info = {}; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); u32 dst = insn->dst_reg; + bool mask; int ret;

dst_reg = &regs[dst]; @@ -12588,11 +12645,14 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; }

+ mask = mask_raw_tp_reg(env, ptr_reg); if (ptr_reg->type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) { verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on %s prohibited, null-check it first\n", dst, reg_type_str(env, ptr_reg->type)); + unmask_raw_tp_reg(ptr_reg, mask); return -EACCES; } + unmask_raw_tp_reg(ptr_reg, mask);

switch (base_type(ptr_reg->type)) { case PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS: @@ -18455,6 +18515,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * for this case. */ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_UNTRUSTED: + case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED | PTR_MAYBE_NULL: if (type == BPF_READ) { if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM |

From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.13-rc3 commit 838a10bd2ebfe11a60dd67687533a7cfc220cc86 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEDPP CVE: CVE-2024-56702

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...

--------------------------------

Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this issue is available in [0].

Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL, causing explicit NULL check branch to be dead code eliminated.

A previous attempt [1], i.e. the second fixed commit, was made to simulate symbolic execution as if in most accesses, the argument is a non-NULL raw_tp, except for conditional jumps. This tried to suppress branch prediction while preserving compatibility, but surfaced issues with production programs that were difficult to solve without increasing verifier complexity. A more complete discussion of issues and fixes is available at [2].

Fix this by maintaining an explicit list of tracepoints where the arguments are known to be NULL, and mark the positional arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. Additionally, capture the tracepoints where arguments are known to be ERR_PTR, and mark these arguments as scalar values to prevent potential dereference.

Each hex digit is used to encode NULL-ness (0x1) or ERR_PTR-ness (0x2), shifted by the zero-indexed argument number x 4. This can be represented as follows: 1st arg: 0x1 2nd arg: 0x10 3rd arg: 0x100 ... and so on (likewise for ERR_PTR case).

In the future, an automated pass will be used to produce such a list, or insert __nullable annotations automatically for tracepoints. Each compilation unit will be analyzed and results will be collated to find whether a tracepoint pointer is definitely not null, maybe null, or an unknown state where verifier conservatively marks it PTR_MAYBE_NULL. A proof of concept of this tool from Eduard is available at [3].

Note that in case we don't find a specification in the raw_tp_null_args array and the tracepoint belongs to a kernel module, we will conservatively mark the arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. This is because unlike for in-tree modules, out-of-tree module tracepoints may pass NULL freely to the tracepoint. We don't protect against such tracepoints passing ERR_PTR (which is uncommon anyway), lest we mark all such arguments as SCALAR_VALUE.

While we are it, let's adjust the test raw_tp_null to not perform dereference of the skb->mark, as that won't be allowed anymore, and make it more robust by using inline assembly to test the dead code elimination behavior, which should still stay the same.

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrCZS6nisraEqehw@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.c... [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241104171959.2938862-1-memxor@gmail.com [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241206161053.809580-1-memxor@gmail.com [3]: https://github.com/eddyz87/llvm-project/tree/nullness-for-tracepoint-params

Reported-by: Juri Lelli juri.lelli@redhat.com # original bug Reported-by: Manu Bretelle chantra@meta.com # bugs in masking fix Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs") Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL") Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com Co-developed-by: Jiri Olsa jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213221929.3495062-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Conflicts: kernel/bpf/btf.c tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_tp_null.c [The conflicts were due to not merge commit d798ce3f4cab] Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui pulehui@huawei.com --- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 138 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index 7a82194ad51d..4299fb5b8d52 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -5924,6 +5924,101 @@ static bool prog_args_trusted(const struct bpf_prog *prog) } }

+struct bpf_raw_tp_null_args { + const char *func; + u64 mask; +}; + +static const struct bpf_raw_tp_null_args raw_tp_null_args[] = { + /* sched */ + { "sched_pi_setprio", 0x10 }, + /* ... from sched_numa_pair_template event class */ + { "sched_stick_numa", 0x100 }, + { "sched_swap_numa", 0x100 }, + /* afs */ + { "afs_make_fs_call", 0x10 }, + { "afs_make_fs_calli", 0x10 }, + { "afs_make_fs_call1", 0x10 }, + { "afs_make_fs_call2", 0x10 }, + { "afs_protocol_error", 0x1 }, + { "afs_flock_ev", 0x10 }, + /* cachefiles */ + { "cachefiles_lookup", 0x1 | 0x200 }, + { "cachefiles_unlink", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_rename", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_prep_read", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_mark_active", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_mark_failed", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_mark_inactive", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_vfs_error", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_io_error", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_open", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_copen", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_close", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_read", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_cread", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_fd_write", 0x1 }, + { "cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release", 0x1 }, + /* ext4, from ext4__mballoc event class */ + { "ext4_mballoc_discard", 0x10 }, + { "ext4_mballoc_free", 0x10 }, + /* fib */ + { "fib_table_lookup", 0x100 }, + /* filelock */ + /* ... from filelock_lock event class */ + { "posix_lock_inode", 0x10 }, + { "fcntl_setlk", 0x10 }, + { "locks_remove_posix", 0x10 }, + { "flock_lock_inode", 0x10 }, + /* ... from filelock_lease event class */ + { "break_lease_noblock", 0x10 }, + { "break_lease_block", 0x10 }, + { "break_lease_unblock", 0x10 }, + { "generic_delete_lease", 0x10 }, + { "time_out_leases", 0x10 }, + /* host1x */ + { "host1x_cdma_push_gather", 0x10000 }, + /* huge_memory */ + { "mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd", 0x10 }, + { "mm_collapse_huge_page_isolate", 0x1 }, + { "mm_khugepaged_scan_file", 0x10 }, + { "mm_khugepaged_collapse_file", 0x10 }, + /* kmem */ + { "mm_page_alloc", 0x1 }, + { "mm_page_pcpu_drain", 0x1 }, + /* .. from mm_page event class */ + { "mm_page_alloc_zone_locked", 0x1 }, + /* netfs */ + { "netfs_failure", 0x10 }, + /* power */ + { "device_pm_callback_start", 0x10 }, + /* qdisc */ + { "qdisc_dequeue", 0x1000 }, + /* rxrpc */ + { "rxrpc_recvdata", 0x1 }, + { "rxrpc_resend", 0x10 }, + /* sunrpc */ + { "xs_stream_read_data", 0x1 }, + /* ... from xprt_cong_event event class */ + { "xprt_reserve_cong", 0x10 }, + { "xprt_release_cong", 0x10 }, + { "xprt_get_cong", 0x10 }, + { "xprt_put_cong", 0x10 }, + /* tcp */ + { "tcp_send_reset", 0x11 }, + /* tegra_apb_dma */ + { "tegra_dma_tx_status", 0x100 }, + /* timer_migration */ + { "tmigr_update_events", 0x1 }, + /* writeback, from writeback_folio_template event class */ + { "writeback_dirty_folio", 0x10 }, + { "folio_wait_writeback", 0x10 }, + /* rdma */ + { "mr_integ_alloc", 0x2000 }, + /* bpf_testmod */ + { "bpf_testmod_test_read", 0x0 }, +}; + bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, const struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info) @@ -5934,6 +6029,7 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, const char *tname = prog->aux->attach_func_name; struct bpf_verifier_log *log = info->log; const struct btf_param *args; + bool ptr_err_raw_tp = false; const char *tag_value; u32 nr_args, arg; int i, ret; @@ -6076,6 +6172,39 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, if (prog_args_trusted(prog)) info->reg_type |= PTR_TRUSTED;

+ if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) { + struct btf *btf = prog->aux->attach_btf; + const struct btf_type *t; + const char *tname; + + /* BTF lookups cannot fail, return false on error */ + t = btf_type_by_id(btf, prog->aux->attach_btf_id); + if (!t) + return false; + tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off); + if (!tname) + return false; + /* Checked by bpf_check_attach_target */ + tname += sizeof("btf_trace_") - 1; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(raw_tp_null_args); i++) { + /* Is this a func with potential NULL args? */ + if (strcmp(tname, raw_tp_null_args[i].func)) + continue; + if (raw_tp_null_args[i].mask & (0x1 << (arg * 4))) + info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; + /* Is the current arg IS_ERR? */ + if (raw_tp_null_args[i].mask & (0x2 << (arg * 4))) + ptr_err_raw_tp = true; + break; + } + /* If we don't know NULL-ness specification and the tracepoint + * is coming from a loadable module, be conservative and mark + * argument as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. + */ + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(raw_tp_null_args) && btf_is_module(btf)) + info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL; + } + if (tgt_prog) { enum bpf_prog_type tgt_type;

@@ -6120,6 +6249,15 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, bpf_log(log, "func '%s' arg%d has btf_id %d type %s '%s'\n", tname, arg, info->btf_id, btf_type_str(t), __btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off)); + + /* Perform all checks on the validity of type for this argument, but if + * we know it can be IS_ERR at runtime, scrub pointer type and mark as + * scalar. + */ + if (ptr_err_raw_tp) { + bpf_log(log, "marking pointer arg%d as scalar as it may encode error", arg); + info->reg_type = SCALAR_VALUE; + } return true; }