support OOM priority for memcg.
Jing Xiangfeng (2): memcg: support priority for oom memcg: Add sysctl memcg_qos_enable
Jinjiang Tu (1): memcg: enable CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY by default
arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 1 + arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 1 + include/linux/memcontrol.h | 26 +++ init/Kconfig | 14 ++ mm/memcontrol.c | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/oom_kill.c | 59 ++++++- 6 files changed, 326 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/3478 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/M...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/3478 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/M...
From: Jing Xiangfeng jingxiangfeng@huawei.com
hulk inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I3ZN3O CVE: NA
--------------------------------------
We first kill the process from the low priority memcg if OOM occurs. If the process is not found, then fallback to normal handle.
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng jingxiangfeng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu tujinjiang@huawei.com --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 23 ++++++ init/Kconfig | 14 ++++ mm/memcontrol.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/oom_kill.c | 56 ++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index fb8db0885bdf..311befb42d7d 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct obj_cgroup; struct page; struct mm_struct; struct kmem_cache; +struct oom_control;
/* Cgroup-specific page state, on top of universal node page state */ enum memcg_stat_item { @@ -297,6 +298,12 @@ struct mem_cgroup { bool tcpmem_active; int tcpmem_pressure;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY + /* Currently support 0 and -1. + * in the future it can expand to other value. + */ + int oom_prio; +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM int kmemcg_id; struct obj_cgroup __rcu *objcg; @@ -341,6 +348,18 @@ struct mem_cgroup { struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[]; };
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY +#define MEMCG_LOW_OOM_PRIORITY -1 +#define MEMCG_HIGH_OOM_PRIORITY 0 +bool memcg_oom_prio_scan_tasks(int (*)(struct task_struct *, void *), + void *); +void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc); +#else +static inline void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc) +{ +} +#endif + /* * size of first charge trial. * TODO: maybe necessary to use big numbers in big irons or dynamic based of the @@ -1597,6 +1616,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, { return 0; } + +static inline void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc) +{ +} #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
static inline void __inc_lruvec_kmem_state(void *p, enum node_stat_item idx) diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index 2ee1384c4f81..4077c52c9154 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -954,6 +954,20 @@ config MEMCG_KMEM depends on MEMCG default y
+config MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY + bool "Enable Memory Cgroup OOM Priority" + depends on MEMCG + depends on X86 || ARM64 + default n + help + Prefer to kill the process from the low priority memcg when OOM occurs. + + When OOM occurs, this feature first selects the low priority memcg that + uses most memory, and then kill the process that uses most memory in the + memcg. If the process is not found, then fallback to normal processing. + + If unsure, say "n". + config BLK_CGROUP bool "IO controller" depends on BLOCK diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 2489f59ddd5a..60666eef659f 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -4024,6 +4024,142 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, } #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY +static void memcg_oom_prio_init(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *parent = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg); + int oom_prio; + + if (!parent) + return; + + oom_prio = READ_ONCE(parent->oom_prio); + WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_prio, oom_prio); +} + +static void memcg_hierarchy_oom_prio_set(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *iter; + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; + + if (!memcg) + memcg = root_mem_cgroup; + + rcu_read_lock(); + css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &memcg->css) { + iter = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); + + WRITE_ONCE(iter->oom_prio, val); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); +} + +static s64 memcg_oom_prio_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, + struct cftype *cft) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); + + return READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_prio); +} + +static int memcg_oom_prio_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, + struct cftype *cft, s64 val) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); + + if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (val != MEMCG_LOW_OOM_PRIORITY && val != MEMCG_HIGH_OOM_PRIORITY) + return -EINVAL; + + WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_prio, val); + memcg_hierarchy_oom_prio_set(memcg, val); + + return 0; +} + +static struct mem_cgroup *memcg_find_max_usage(struct mem_cgroup *last) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *iter, *max_memcg = NULL; + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; + unsigned long usage, max_usage = 0; + int oom_prio; + + rcu_read_lock(); + css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &root_mem_cgroup->css) { + iter = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); + oom_prio = READ_ONCE(iter->oom_prio); + + if (oom_prio == MEMCG_HIGH_OOM_PRIORITY || + iter == root_mem_cgroup || + iter == last) + continue; + + usage = mem_cgroup_usage(iter, false); + if (usage > max_usage) { + max_usage = usage; + max_memcg = iter; + } + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return max_memcg; +} + +bool memcg_oom_prio_scan_tasks(int (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), + void *arg) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *max, *last = NULL; + struct oom_control *oc = arg; + struct css_task_iter it; + struct task_struct *task; + int ret = 0; + bool retry = true; + +retry: + max = memcg_find_max_usage(last); + if (!max) + return false; + + css_task_iter_start(&max->css, 0, &it); + while (!ret && (task = css_task_iter_next(&it))) { + if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE)) + continue; + + ret = fn(task, arg); + } + css_task_iter_end(&it); + + if (ret) + return false; + + if (!oc->chosen && retry) { + last = max; + retry = false; + goto retry; + } + + if (oc->chosen) + pr_info("The bad task [%d:%s] is from low-priority memcg.\n", + oc->chosen->pid, oc->chosen->comm); + + return oc->chosen ? true : false; +} + +void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc) +{ + if (oc->chosen) { + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + + memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(oc->chosen); + if (READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_prio) == MEMCG_LOW_OOM_PRIORITY) + pr_info("The bad task [%d:%s] is from low-priority memcg.\n", + oc->chosen->pid, oc->chosen->comm); + } +} +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
#define LRU_ALL_FILE (BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE) | BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_FILE)) @@ -5217,6 +5353,17 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_legacy_files[] = { .name = "pressure_level", .seq_show = mem_cgroup_dummy_seq_show, }, +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY + { + /* + * This interface is used to control the oom priority + * of the memcg. The interface name is for compatibility. + */ + .name = "qos_level", + .read_s64 = memcg_oom_prio_read, + .write_s64 = memcg_oom_prio_write, + }, +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA { .name = "numa_stat", @@ -5599,6 +5746,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css) FLUSH_TIME); lru_gen_online_memcg(memcg);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY + memcg_oom_prio_init(memcg); +#endif + /* Online state pins memcg ID, memcg ID pins CSS */ refcount_set(&memcg->id.ref, 1); css_get(css); diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 44bde56ecd02..d024f19082a6 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -305,6 +305,46 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct oom_control *oc) return CONSTRAINT_NONE; }
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY +/** + * We choose the task in low-priority memcg firstly. For the same state, we + * choose the task with the highest number of 'points'. + */ +static bool oom_next_task(struct task_struct *task, struct oom_control *oc, + long points) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *cur_memcg; + struct mem_cgroup *oc_memcg; + int cur_memcg_prio, oc_memcg_prio; + + if (points == LONG_MIN) + return true; + + if (!oc->chosen) + return false; + + oc_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(oc->chosen); + cur_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(task); + oc_memcg_prio = READ_ONCE(oc_memcg->oom_prio); + cur_memcg_prio = READ_ONCE(cur_memcg->oom_prio); + + if (cur_memcg_prio == oc_memcg_prio) + return points < oc->chosen_points; + + /* if oc is low-priority, so skip the task */ + if (oc_memcg_prio == MEMCG_LOW_OOM_PRIORITY) + return true; + + return false; +} +#else +static inline bool oom_next_task(struct task_struct *task, + struct oom_control *oc, long points) +{ + return points == LONG_MIN || points < oc->chosen_points; +} +#endif + static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg) { struct oom_control *oc = arg; @@ -339,7 +379,7 @@ static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg) }
points = oom_badness(task, oc->totalpages); - if (points == LONG_MIN || points < oc->chosen_points) + if (oom_next_task(task, oc, points)) goto next;
select: @@ -365,11 +405,16 @@ static void select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc) { oc->chosen_points = LONG_MIN;
- if (is_memcg_oom(oc)) + if (is_memcg_oom(oc)) { mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(oc->memcg, oom_evaluate_task, oc); - else { + memcg_print_bad_task(oc); + } else { struct task_struct *p;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY + if (memcg_oom_prio_scan_tasks(oom_evaluate_task, oc)) + return; +#endif rcu_read_lock(); for_each_process(p) if (oom_evaluate_task(p, oc)) @@ -425,9 +470,10 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct oom_control *oc) pr_info("Tasks state (memory values in pages):\n"); pr_info("[ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name\n");
- if (is_memcg_oom(oc)) + if (is_memcg_oom(oc)) { mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(oc->memcg, dump_task, oc); - else { + memcg_print_bad_task(oc); + } else { struct task_struct *p;
rcu_read_lock();
From: Jing Xiangfeng jingxiangfeng@huawei.com
hulk inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I3ZN3O CVE: NA
--------------------------------------
This patch adds sysctl memcg_qos_enable to enable/disable memcg priority feature. If you want to enable it by writing 1:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/memcg_qos_enable
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng jingxiangfeng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu tujinjiang@huawei.com --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 3 ++ mm/memcontrol.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index 311befb42d7d..274745203d4e 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -351,9 +351,12 @@ struct mem_cgroup { #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY #define MEMCG_LOW_OOM_PRIORITY -1 #define MEMCG_HIGH_OOM_PRIORITY 0 +extern int sysctl_memcg_oom_prio; + bool memcg_oom_prio_scan_tasks(int (*)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *); void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc); +bool memcg_oom_prio_disabled(void); #else static inline void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc) { diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 60666eef659f..2a29b7997d10 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -4025,6 +4025,15 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, #endif
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY +#define ENABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY 1 +#define DISABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY 0 +int sysctl_memcg_oom_prio = DISABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY; + +bool memcg_oom_prio_disabled(void) +{ + return READ_ONCE(sysctl_memcg_oom_prio) == DISABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY; +} + static void memcg_oom_prio_init(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { struct mem_cgroup *parent = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg); @@ -4059,6 +4068,9 @@ static s64 memcg_oom_prio_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, { struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
+ if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) + return 0; + return READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_prio); }
@@ -4067,6 +4079,9 @@ static int memcg_oom_prio_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, { struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
+ if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) + return -EACCES; + if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) return -EINVAL;
@@ -4117,6 +4132,8 @@ bool memcg_oom_prio_scan_tasks(int (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), int ret = 0; bool retry = true;
+ if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) + return false; retry: max = memcg_find_max_usage(last); if (!max) @@ -4149,6 +4166,9 @@ bool memcg_oom_prio_scan_tasks(int (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *),
void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc) { + if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) + return; + if (oc->chosen) { struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
@@ -4158,6 +4178,65 @@ void memcg_print_bad_task(struct oom_control *oc) oc->chosen->pid, oc->chosen->comm); } } + +static void memcg_oom_prio_reset(void) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *iter; + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; + + rcu_read_lock(); + css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &root_mem_cgroup->css) { + iter = mem_cgroup_from_css(css); + WRITE_ONCE(iter->oom_prio, 0); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); +} + +static int sysctl_memcg_oom_prio_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, + void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos) +{ + int ret; + + ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (write) { + if (READ_ONCE(sysctl_memcg_oom_prio) == ENABLE_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY) { + pr_info("enable memcg priority.\n"); + } else { + memcg_oom_prio_reset(); + pr_info("disable memcg priority.\n"); + } + } + + return ret; +} + +static struct ctl_table memcg_oom_prio_sysctls[] = { + { + /* + * This sysctl is used to control memcg oom priority + * feature, the sysctl name is for compatibility. + */ + .procname = "memcg_qos_enable", + .data = &sysctl_memcg_oom_prio, + .maxlen = sizeof(int), + .mode = 0644, + .proc_handler = sysctl_memcg_oom_prio_handler, + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, + .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE, + }, + {} +}; + +static __init int memcg_oom_prio_sysctls_init(void) +{ + register_sysctl_init("vm", memcg_oom_prio_sysctls); + return 0; +} +late_initcall(memcg_oom_prio_sysctls_init); + #endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index d024f19082a6..c1a8f96cefc0 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -317,6 +317,9 @@ static bool oom_next_task(struct task_struct *task, struct oom_control *oc, struct mem_cgroup *oc_memcg; int cur_memcg_prio, oc_memcg_prio;
+ if (memcg_oom_prio_disabled()) + return points == LONG_MIN || points < oc->chosen_points; + if (points == LONG_MIN) return true;
hulk inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I3ZN3O CVE: NA
--------------------------------------
enable CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PROIRITY to support memcg OOM priority.
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng jingxiangfeng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu tujinjiang@huawei.com --- arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 1 + arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig index 33ba39711884..f5d703d25639 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ CONFIG_PAGE_COUNTER=y CONFIG_MEMCG=y CONFIG_MEMCG_V1_RECLAIM=y CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM=y +CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY=y CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP=y CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK=y CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED=y diff --git a/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig b/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig index 44040b835333..87264248b1f8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig +++ b/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ CONFIG_PAGE_COUNTER=y CONFIG_MEMCG=y CONFIG_MEMCG_V1_RECLAIM=y CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM=y +CONFIG_MEMCG_OOM_PRIORITY=y CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP=y CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK=y CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED=y
-
Jinjiang Tu -
patchwork bot