From: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.1-rc7 commit 05530ef7cf7c7d700f6753f058999b1b5099a026 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRDZ CVE: CVE-2022-48994
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
--------------------------------
With clang's kernel control flow integrity (kCFI, CONFIG_CFI_CLANG), indirect call targets are validated against the expected function pointer prototype to make sure the call target is valid to help mitigate ROP attacks. If they are not identical, there is a failure at run time, which manifests as either a kernel panic or thread getting killed.
seq_copy_in_user() and seq_copy_in_kernel() did not have prototypes matching snd_seq_dump_func_t. Adjust this and remove the casts. There are not resulting binary output differences.
This was found as a result of Clang's new -Wcast-function-type-strict flag, which is more sensitive than the simpler -Wcast-function-type, which only checks for type width mismatches.
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202211041527.HD8TLSE1-lkp@intel.com Cc: Jaroslav Kysela perex@perex.cz Cc: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.com Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" gustavoars@kernel.org Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118232346.never.380-kees@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun luogengkun2@huawei.com --- sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c index 5b0388202bac..ac854beb8347 100644 --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c @@ -126,15 +126,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_seq_dump_var_event); * expand the variable length event to linear buffer space. */
-static int seq_copy_in_kernel(char **bufptr, const void *src, int size) +static int seq_copy_in_kernel(void *ptr, void *src, int size) { + char **bufptr = ptr; + memcpy(*bufptr, src, size); *bufptr += size; return 0; }
-static int seq_copy_in_user(char __user **bufptr, const void *src, int size) +static int seq_copy_in_user(void *ptr, void *src, int size) { + char __user **bufptr = ptr; + if (copy_to_user(*bufptr, src, size)) return -EFAULT; *bufptr += size; @@ -163,8 +167,7 @@ int snd_seq_expand_var_event(const struct snd_seq_event *event, int count, char return newlen; } err = snd_seq_dump_var_event(event, - in_kernel ? (snd_seq_dump_func_t)seq_copy_in_kernel : - (snd_seq_dump_func_t)seq_copy_in_user, + in_kernel ? seq_copy_in_kernel : seq_copy_in_user, &buf); return err < 0 ? err : newlen; }
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,转换为PR失败! 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/M... 失败原因:应用补丁/补丁集失败,Patch failed at 0001 ALSA: seq: Fix function prototype mismatch in snd_seq_expand_var_event 建议解决方法:请查看失败原因, 确认补丁是否可以应用在当前期望分支的最新代码上
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org has been converted to PR failed! Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/M... Failed Reason: apply patch(es) failed, Patch failed at 0001 ALSA: seq: Fix function prototype mismatch in snd_seq_expand_var_event Suggest Solution: please checkout if the failed patch(es) can work on the newest codes in expected branch