From: Juergen Gross jgross@suse.com
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.198 commit 660627c71bc1098aa94e5f208f14748b105b73bc category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I896EC CVE: CVE-2023-34324
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
commit 87797fad6cce28ec9be3c13f031776ff4f104cfc upstream.
In unprivileged Xen guests event handling can cause a deadlock with Xen console handling. The evtchn_rwlock and the hvc_lock are taken in opposite sequence in __hvc_poll() and in Xen console IRQ handling. Normally this is no problem, as the evtchn_rwlock is taken as a reader in both paths, but as soon as an event channel is being closed, the lock will be taken as a writer, which will cause read_lock() to block:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 (IRQ handling) (__hvc_poll()) (closing event channel)
read_lock(evtchn_rwlock) spin_lock(hvc_lock) write_lock(evtchn_rwlock) [blocks] spin_lock(hvc_lock) [blocks] read_lock(evtchn_rwlock) [blocks due to writer waiting, and not in_interrupt()]
This issue can be avoided by replacing evtchn_rwlock with RCU in xen_free_irq(). Note that RCU is used only to delay freeing of the irq_info memory. There is no RCU based dereferencing or replacement of pointers involved.
In order to avoid potential races between removing the irq_info reference and handling of interrupts, set the irq_info pointer to NULL only when freeing its memory. The IRQ itself must be freed at that time, too, as otherwise the same IRQ number could be allocated again before handling of the old instance would have been finished.
This is XSA-441 / CVE-2023-34324.
Fixes: 54c9de89895e ("xen/events: add a new "late EOI" evtchn framework") Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross jgross@suse.com Reviewed-by: Julien Grall jgrall@amazon.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin liushixin2@huawei.com --- drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c index fba78daee449a..52891546e6973 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/irqnr.h> #include <linux/pci.h> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ enum xen_irq_type { struct irq_info { struct list_head list; struct list_head eoi_list; + struct rcu_work rwork; short refcnt; short spurious_cnt; short type; /* type */ @@ -141,23 +143,13 @@ const struct evtchn_ops *evtchn_ops; */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_mapping_update_lock);
-/* - * Lock protecting event handling loop against removing event channels. - * Adding of event channels is no issue as the associated IRQ becomes active - * only after everything is setup (before request_[threaded_]irq() the handler - * can't be entered for an event, as the event channel will be unmasked only - * then). - */ -static DEFINE_RWLOCK(evtchn_rwlock); - /* * Lock hierarchy: * * irq_mapping_update_lock - * evtchn_rwlock - * IRQ-desc lock - * percpu eoi_list_lock - * irq_info->lock + * IRQ-desc lock + * percpu eoi_list_lock + * irq_info->lock */
static LIST_HEAD(xen_irq_list_head); @@ -272,6 +264,22 @@ static void set_info_for_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_info *info) irq_set_chip_data(irq, info); }
+static void delayed_free_irq(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct irq_info *info = container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct irq_info, + rwork); + unsigned int irq = info->irq; + + /* Remove the info pointer only now, with no potential users left. */ + set_info_for_irq(irq, NULL); + + kfree(info); + + /* Legacy IRQ descriptors are managed by the arch. */ + if (irq >= nr_legacy_irqs()) + irq_free_desc(irq); +} + /* Constructors for packed IRQ information. */ static int xen_irq_info_common_setup(struct irq_info *info, unsigned irq, @@ -606,33 +614,36 @@ static void xen_irq_lateeoi_worker(struct work_struct *work)
eoi = container_of(to_delayed_work(work), struct lateeoi_work, delayed);
- read_lock_irqsave(&evtchn_rwlock, flags); + rcu_read_lock();
while (true) { - spin_lock(&eoi->eoi_list_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&eoi->eoi_list_lock, flags);
info = list_first_entry_or_null(&eoi->eoi_list, struct irq_info, eoi_list);
- if (info == NULL || now < info->eoi_time) { - spin_unlock(&eoi->eoi_list_lock); + if (info == NULL) + break; + + if (now < info->eoi_time) { + mod_delayed_work_on(info->eoi_cpu, system_wq, + &eoi->delayed, + info->eoi_time - now); break; }
list_del_init(&info->eoi_list);
- spin_unlock(&eoi->eoi_list_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&eoi->eoi_list_lock, flags);
info->eoi_time = 0;
xen_irq_lateeoi_locked(info, false); }
- if (info) - mod_delayed_work_on(info->eoi_cpu, system_wq, - &eoi->delayed, info->eoi_time - now); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&eoi->eoi_list_lock, flags);
- read_unlock_irqrestore(&evtchn_rwlock, flags); + rcu_read_unlock(); }
static void xen_cpu_init_eoi(unsigned int cpu) @@ -647,16 +658,15 @@ static void xen_cpu_init_eoi(unsigned int cpu) void xen_irq_lateeoi(unsigned int irq, unsigned int eoi_flags) { struct irq_info *info; - unsigned long flags;
- read_lock_irqsave(&evtchn_rwlock, flags); + rcu_read_lock();
info = info_for_irq(irq);
if (info) xen_irq_lateeoi_locked(info, eoi_flags & XEN_EOI_FLAG_SPURIOUS);
- read_unlock_irqrestore(&evtchn_rwlock, flags); + rcu_read_unlock(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_irq_lateeoi);
@@ -675,6 +685,7 @@ static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
info->type = IRQT_UNBOUND; info->refcnt = -1; + INIT_RCU_WORK(&info->rwork, delayed_free_irq);
set_info_for_irq(irq, info);
@@ -727,31 +738,18 @@ static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_gsi(unsigned gsi) static void xen_free_irq(unsigned irq) { struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq); - unsigned long flags;
if (WARN_ON(!info)) return;
- write_lock_irqsave(&evtchn_rwlock, flags); - if (!list_empty(&info->eoi_list)) lateeoi_list_del(info);
list_del(&info->list);
- set_info_for_irq(irq, NULL); - WARN_ON(info->refcnt > 0);
- write_unlock_irqrestore(&evtchn_rwlock, flags); - - kfree(info); - - /* Legacy IRQ descriptors are managed by the arch. */ - if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs()) - return; - - irq_free_desc(irq); + queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &info->rwork); }
static void xen_evtchn_close(evtchn_port_t port) @@ -1639,7 +1637,14 @@ static void __xen_evtchn_do_upcall(void) int cpu = smp_processor_id(); struct evtchn_loop_ctrl ctrl = { 0 };
- read_lock(&evtchn_rwlock); + /* + * When closing an event channel the associated IRQ must not be freed + * until all cpus have left the event handling loop. This is ensured + * by taking the rcu_read_lock() while handling events, as freeing of + * the IRQ is handled via queue_rcu_work() _after_ closing the event + * channel. + */ + rcu_read_lock();
do { vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending = 0; @@ -1652,7 +1657,7 @@ static void __xen_evtchn_do_upcall(void)
} while (vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending);
- read_unlock(&evtchn_rwlock); + rcu_read_unlock();
/* * Increment irq_epoch only now to defer EOIs only for
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/2571 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/O...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/2571 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/O...