From: Liu Jian liujian56@huawei.com
maillist inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5K0NK CVE: NA
Reference: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220924080157.247678-1...
--------------------------------
The following warning is displayed when the tcp6-multi-diffip11 stress test case of the LTP test suite is tested:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [ns-tcpserver:48198] CPU: 0 PID: 48198 Comm: ns-tcpserver Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.0.0-rc6+ #39 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : des3_ede_encrypt+0x27c/0x460 [libdes] lr : 0x3f sp : ffff80000ceaa1b0 x29: ffff80000ceaa1b0 x28: ffff0000df056100 x27: ffff0000e51e5280 x26: ffff80004df75030 x25: ffff0000e51e4600 x24: 000000000000003b x23: 0000000000802080 x22: 000000000000003d x21: 0000000000000038 x20: 0000000080000020 x19: 000000000000000a x18: 0000000000000033 x17: ffff0000e51e4780 x16: ffff80004e2d1448 x15: ffff80004e2d1248 x14: ffff0000e51e4680 x13: ffff80004e2d1348 x12: ffff80004e2d1548 x11: ffff80004e2d1848 x10: ffff80004e2d1648 x9 : ffff80004e2d1748 x8 : ffff80004e2d1948 x7 : 000000000bcaf83d x6 : 000000000000001b x5 : ffff80004e2d1048 x4 : 00000000761bf3bf x3 : 000000007f1dd0a3 x2 : ffff0000e51e4780 x1 : ffff0000e3b9a2f8 x0 : 00000000db44e872 Call trace: des3_ede_encrypt+0x27c/0x460 [libdes] crypto_des3_ede_encrypt+0x1c/0x30 [des_generic] crypto_cbc_encrypt+0x148/0x190 crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 crypto_authenc_encrypt+0xc8/0xfc [authenc] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 echainiv_encrypt+0x144/0x1a0 [echainiv] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 esp6_output_tail+0x1c8/0x5d0 [esp6] esp6_output+0x120/0x278 [esp6] xfrm_output_one+0x458/0x4ec xfrm_output_resume+0x6c/0x1f0 xfrm_output+0xac/0x4ac __xfrm6_output+0x130/0x270 xfrm6_output+0x60/0xec ip6_xmit+0x2ec/0x5bc inet6_csk_xmit+0xbc/0x10c __tcp_transmit_skb+0x460/0x8c0 tcp_write_xmit+0x348/0x890 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x44/0x110 tcp_rcv_established+0x3c8/0x720 tcp_v6_do_rcv+0xdc/0x4a0 tcp_v6_rcv+0xc24/0xcb0 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xf0/0x574 ip6_input_finish+0x48/0x7c ip6_input+0x48/0xc0 ip6_rcv_finish+0x80/0x9c xfrm_trans_reinject+0xb0/0xf4 tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xf8/0x134 tasklet_action+0x30/0x3c __do_softirq+0x128/0x368 do_softirq+0xb4/0xc0 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb0/0xb4 put_cpu_fpsimd_context+0x40/0x70 kernel_neon_end+0x20/0x40 sha1_base_do_update.constprop.0.isra.0+0x11c/0x140 [sha1_ce] sha1_ce_finup+0x94/0x110 [sha1_ce] crypto_shash_finup+0x34/0xc0 hmac_finup+0x48/0xe0 crypto_shash_finup+0x34/0xc0 shash_digest_unaligned+0x74/0x90 crypto_shash_digest+0x4c/0x9c shash_ahash_digest+0xc8/0xf0 shash_async_digest+0x28/0x34 crypto_ahash_digest+0x48/0xcc crypto_authenc_genicv+0x88/0xcc [authenc] crypto_authenc_encrypt+0xd8/0xfc [authenc] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 echainiv_encrypt+0x144/0x1a0 [echainiv] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 esp6_output_tail+0x1c8/0x5d0 [esp6] esp6_output+0x120/0x278 [esp6] xfrm_output_one+0x458/0x4ec xfrm_output_resume+0x6c/0x1f0 xfrm_output+0xac/0x4ac __xfrm6_output+0x130/0x270 xfrm6_output+0x60/0xec ip6_xmit+0x2ec/0x5bc inet6_csk_xmit+0xbc/0x10c __tcp_transmit_skb+0x460/0x8c0 tcp_write_xmit+0x348/0x890 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x44/0x110 tcp_push+0xb4/0x14c tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x71c/0xb64 tcp_sendmsg+0x40/0x6c inet6_sendmsg+0x4c/0x80 sock_sendmsg+0x5c/0x6c __sys_sendto+0x128/0x15c __arm64_sys_sendto+0x30/0x40 invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x170/0x194 do_el0_svc+0x38/0x4c el0_svc+0x28/0xe0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xbc/0x13c el0t_64_sync+0x180/0x184
Get softirq info by bcc tool: ./softirqs -NT 10 Tracing soft irq event time... Hit Ctrl-C to end.
15:34:34 SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs block 158990 timer 20030920 sched 46577080 net_rx 676746820 tasklet 9906067650
15:34:45 SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs block 86100 sched 38849790 net_rx 676532470 timer 1163848790 tasklet 9409019620
15:34:55 SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs sched 58078450 net_rx 475156720 timer 533832410 tasklet 9431333300
The tasklet software interrupt takes too much time. Therefore, the xfrm_trans_reinject executor is changed from tasklet to workqueue. Add add spin lock to protect the queue. This reduces the processing flow of the tcp_sendmsg function in this scenario.
Fixes: acf568ee859f0 ("xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets through tasklet") Signed-off-by: Liu Jian liujian56@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Conflicts: net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian liujian56@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Yue Haibing yuehaibing@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai zhengzengkai@huawei.com --- net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c index 61e6220ddd5a..66e4d3395f82 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ #include "xfrm_inout.h"
struct xfrm_trans_tasklet { - struct tasklet_struct tasklet; + struct work_struct work; + spinlock_t queue_lock; struct sk_buff_head queue; };
@@ -760,18 +761,22 @@ int xfrm_input_resume(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_input_resume);
-static void xfrm_trans_reinject(unsigned long data) +static void xfrm_trans_reinject(struct work_struct *work) { - struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans = (void *)data; + struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans = container_of(work, struct xfrm_trans_tasklet, work); struct sk_buff_head queue; struct sk_buff *skb;
__skb_queue_head_init(&queue); + spin_lock_bh(&trans->queue_lock); skb_queue_splice_init(&trans->queue, &queue); + spin_unlock_bh(&trans->queue_lock);
+ local_bh_disable(); while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&queue))) XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish(XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->net, NULL, skb); + local_bh_enable(); }
int xfrm_trans_queue_net(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, @@ -789,8 +794,10 @@ int xfrm_trans_queue_net(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish = finish; XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->net = net; + spin_lock_bh(&trans->queue_lock); __skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb); - tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet); + spin_unlock_bh(&trans->queue_lock); + schedule_work(&trans->work); return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_trans_queue_net); @@ -817,8 +824,8 @@ void __init xfrm_input_init(void) struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans;
trans = &per_cpu(xfrm_trans_tasklet, i); + spin_lock_init(&trans->queue_lock); __skb_queue_head_init(&trans->queue); - tasklet_init(&trans->tasklet, xfrm_trans_reinject, - (unsigned long)trans); + INIT_WORK(&trans->work, xfrm_trans_reinject); } }
-
Zheng Zengkai