From: ruanjinjie ruanjinjie@huawei.com
hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I65T0J CVE: NA
-------------------------------
In emulation_proc_handler(), read and write operations are performed on insn->current_mode. In the concurrency scenario, mutex only protects writing insn->current_mode, and not protects the read. Suppose there are two concurrent tasks, task1 updates insn->current_mode to INSN_EMULATE in the critical section, the prev_mode of task2 is still the old data INSN_UNDEF of insn->current_mode. As a result, two tasks call update_insn_emulation_mode twice with prev_mode = INSN_UNDEF and current_mode = INSN_EMULATE, then call register_emulation_hooks twice, resulting in a list_add double problem.
Call trace: __list_add_valid+0xd8/0xe4 register_undef_hook+0x94/0x13c update_insn_emulation_mode+0xd0/0x12c emulation_proc_handler+0xd8/0xf4 proc_sys_call_handler+0x140/0x250 proc_sys_write+0x1c/0x2c new_sync_write+0xec/0x18c vfs_write+0x214/0x2ac ksys_write+0x70/0xfc __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x1bc do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x94 el0_svc+0x20/0x30 el0_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb4 el0_sync+0x160/0x180
Fixes: 08f3f0b2fe7e ("arm64: fix oops in concurrently setting insn_emulation sysctls") Signed-off-by: ruanjinjie ruanjinjie@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Zhang Jianhua chris.zjh@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Liao Chang liaochang1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu liuyongqiang13@huawei.com --- arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c index 88d3454f2848..07a0095956f1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c @@ -211,10 +211,12 @@ static int emulation_proc_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, loff_t *ppos) { int ret = 0; - struct insn_emulation *insn = container_of(table->data, struct insn_emulation, current_mode); - enum insn_emulation_mode prev_mode = insn->current_mode; + struct insn_emulation *insn; + enum insn_emulation_mode prev_mode;
mutex_lock(&insn_emulation_mutex); + insn = container_of(table->data, struct insn_emulation, current_mode); + prev_mode = insn->current_mode; ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
if (ret || !write || prev_mode == insn->current_mode)
-
Yongqiang Liu