From: Pierre Gondois Pierre.Gondois@arm.com
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.19-rc1 commit 6380b7b2b29da9d9c5ab2d4a265901cd93ba3696 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I8W708
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
--------------------------------
The transition_delay_us (struct cpufreq_policy) is currently defined as: Preferred average time interval between consecutive invocations of the driver to set the frequency for this policy. To be set by the scaling driver (0, which is the default, means no preference). The transition_latency represents the amount of time necessary for a CPU to change its frequency.
A PCCT table advertises mutliple values: - pcc_nominal: Expected latency to process a command, in microseconds - pcc_mpar: The maximum number of periodic requests that the subspace channel can support, reported in commands per minute. 0 indicates no limitation. - pcc_mrtt: The minimum amount of time that OSPM must wait after the completion of a command before issuing the next command, in microseconds. cppc_get_transition_latency() allows to get the max of them.
commit d4f3388afd48 ("cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us") allows to select transition_delay_us based on the platform, and fallbacks to cppc_get_transition_latency() otherwise.
If _CPC objects are not using PCC channels (no PPCT table), the transition_delay_us is set to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, leading to really long periods between frequency updates (~4s).
If the desired_reg, where performance requests are written, is in SystemMemory or SystemIo ACPI address space, there is no delay in requests. So return 0 instead of CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, leading to transition_delay_us being set to LATENCY_MULTIPLIER us (1000 us).
This patch also adds two macros to check the address spaces.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois pierre.gondois@arm.com Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng zengheng4@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 7e9c29d5a8b0..d215a76034af 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -101,6 +101,16 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpc_desc *, cpc_desc_ptr); (cpc)->cpc_entry.reg.space_id == \ ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM)
+/* Check if a CPC register is in SystemMemory */ +#define CPC_IN_SYSTEM_MEMORY(cpc) ((cpc)->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && \ + (cpc)->cpc_entry.reg.space_id == \ + ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) + +/* Check if a CPC register is in SystemIo */ +#define CPC_IN_SYSTEM_IO(cpc) ((cpc)->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && \ + (cpc)->cpc_entry.reg.space_id == \ + ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) + /* Evalutes to True if reg is a NULL register descriptor */ #define IS_NULL_REG(reg) ((reg)->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY && \ (reg)->address == 0 && \ @@ -1458,6 +1468,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_perf); * transition latency for perfromance change requests. The closest we have * is the timing information from the PCCT tables which provides the info * on the number and frequency of PCC commands the platform can handle. + * + * If desired_reg is in the SystemMemory or SystemIo ACPI address space, + * then assume there is no latency. */ unsigned int cppc_get_transition_latency(int cpu_num) { @@ -1483,7 +1496,9 @@ unsigned int cppc_get_transition_latency(int cpu_num) return CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
desired_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[DESIRED_PERF]; - if (!CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg)) + if (CPC_IN_SYSTEM_MEMORY(desired_reg) || CPC_IN_SYSTEM_IO(desired_reg)) + return 0; + else if (!CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg)) return CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
if (pcc_ss_id < 0)
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/3982 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/Q...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/3982 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/Q...