From: Dongliang Mu mudongliangabcd@gmail.com
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.1-rc1 commit 2e488f13755ffbb60f307e991b27024716a33b29 category: bugfix bugzilla: 187543, https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5NZ98 CVE: CVE-2022-2978
-------------------------------
In alloc_inode, inode_init_always() could return -ENOMEM if security_inode_alloc() fails, which causes inode->i_private uninitialized. Then nilfs_is_metadata_file_inode() returns true and nilfs_free_inode() wrongly calls nilfs_mdt_destroy(), which frees the uninitialized inode->i_private and leads to crashes(e.g., UAF/GPF).
Fix this by moving security_inode_alloc just prior to this_cpu_inc(nr_inodes)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAFcO6XOcf1Jj2SeGt=jJV59wmhESeSKpfR0omdFRq+J9nD1vf... Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com Reported-by: Hao Sun sunhao.th@gmail.com Reported-by: Jiacheng Xu stitch@zju.edu.cn Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) brauner@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu mudongliangabcd@gmail.com Cc: Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng lilingfeng3@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi yi.zhang@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng xiujianfeng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu liuyongqiang13@huawei.com --- fs/inode.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index c9eb5041ffae..5df2e8ee23ed 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -166,8 +166,6 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode) inode->i_wb_frn_history = 0; #endif
- if (security_inode_alloc(inode)) - goto out; spin_lock_init(&inode->i_lock); lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_lock, &sb->s_type->i_lock_key);
@@ -195,11 +193,12 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode) inode->i_fsnotify_mask = 0; #endif inode->i_flctx = NULL; + + if (unlikely(security_inode_alloc(inode))) + return -ENOMEM; this_cpu_inc(nr_inodes);
return 0; -out: - return -ENOMEM; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_init_always);
From: Dokyung Song dokyung.song@gmail.com
maillist inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5YGD6 CVE: CVE-2022-3628
Reference: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20221021061359.GA5...
--------------------------------
This patch fixes an intra-object buffer overflow in brcmfmac that occurs when the device provides a 'bsscfgidx' equal to or greater than the buffer size. The patch adds a check that leads to a safe failure if that is the case.
This fixes CVE-2022-3628.
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c index 52 is out of range for type 'brcmf_if *[16]' CPU: 0 PID: 1898 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G O 5.14.0+ #132 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events brcmf_fweh_event_worker Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x69/0x80 ? memcpy+0x39/0x60 brcmf_fweh_event_worker+0xae1/0xc00 ? brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x100/0x100 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0 process_one_work+0x873/0x13e0 ? lock_release+0x640/0x640 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 worker_thread+0x8b/0xd10 ? __kthread_parkme+0xd9/0x1d0 ? process_one_work+0x13e0/0x13e0 kthread+0x379/0x450 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
================================================================================ general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe5601c0020023fff: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x2b0100010011fff8-0x2b0100010011ffff] CPU: 0 PID: 1898 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G O 5.14.0+ #132 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events brcmf_fweh_event_worker RIP: 0010:brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x42/0x100 Code: 89 f5 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 79 0b 38 fe 48 85 ed 74 7e e8 6f 0b 38 fe 48 89 ea 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 8b 00 00 00 4c 8b 7d 00 44 89 e0 48 ba 00 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000259fbd8 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888115d8cd50 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0560200020023fff RSI: ffffffff8304bc91 RDI: ffff888115d8cd50 RBP: 2b0100010011ffff R08: ffff888112340050 R09: ffffed1023549809 R10: ffff88811aa4c047 R11: ffffed1023549808 R12: 0000000000000045 R13: ffffc9000259fca0 R14: ffff888112340050 R15: ffff888112340000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811aa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000004053ccc0 CR3: 0000000112740000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: brcmf_fweh_event_worker+0x117/0xc00 ? brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x100/0x100 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0 process_one_work+0x873/0x13e0 ? lock_release+0x640/0x640 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 worker_thread+0x8b/0xd10 ? __kthread_parkme+0xd9/0x1d0 ? process_one_work+0x13e0/0x13e0 kthread+0x379/0x450 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Modules linked in: 88XXau(O) 88x2bu(O) ---[ end trace 41d302138f3ff55a ]--- RIP: 0010:brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x42/0x100 Code: 89 f5 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 79 0b 38 fe 48 85 ed 74 7e e8 6f 0b 38 fe 48 89 ea 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 8b 00 00 00 4c 8b 7d 00 44 89 e0 48 ba 00 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000259fbd8 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888115d8cd50 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0560200020023fff RSI: ffffffff8304bc91 RDI: ffff888115d8cd50 RBP: 2b0100010011ffff R08: ffff888112340050 R09: ffffed1023549809 R10: ffff88811aa4c047 R11: ffffed1023549808 R12: 0000000000000045 R13: ffffc9000259fca0 R14: ffff888112340050 R15: ffff888112340000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811aa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000004053ccc0 CR3: 0000000112740000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Reported-by: Dokyung Song dokyungs@yonsei.ac.kr Reported-by: Jisoo Jang jisoo.jang@yonsei.ac.kr Reported-by: Minsuk Kang linuxlovemin@yonsei.ac.kr Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel aspriel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Dokyung Song dokyung.song@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Liu Jian liujian56@huawei.com Conflicts: drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c Reviewed-by: Yue Haibing yuehaibing@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng xiujianfeng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu liuyongqiang13@huawei.com --- drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c index e7eaa57d11d9..4a900d8d98b8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c @@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ static void brcmf_fweh_event_worker(struct work_struct *work) brcmf_fweh_event_name(event->code), event->code, event->emsg.ifidx, event->emsg.bsscfgidx, event->emsg.addr); + if (event->emsg.bsscfgidx >= BRCMF_MAX_IFS) { + brcmf_err("invalid bsscfg index: %u\n", event->emsg.bsscfgidx); + goto event_free; + }
/* convert event message */ emsg_be = &event->emsg;
-
Yongqiang Liu