Chao Yu (2): f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() f2fs: fix to avoid potential panic during recovery
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 5 +++++ fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/9462 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/X...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/9462 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/X...
From: Chao Yu chao@kernel.org
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.210 commit 80c69f576ff39d6ae8a6e2107da3dc03b533759c category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L9NQ CVE: NA
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...
--------------------------------
[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc132e028f3b7d4cf17e6bfc8cb36c7fd ]
Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data() rather than letting it fails silently.
Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() as below: - trigger f2fs_bug_on() only for ENOSPC case; - use do-while statement to avoid redundant codes;
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu chao@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lin Yujun linyujun809@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com --- fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c index c3c527afdd07..2700e0fdd3e0 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c @@ -641,7 +641,16 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, */ if (dest == NEW_ADDR) { f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range(&dn, 1); - f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn); + do { + err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn); + if (err == -ENOSPC) { + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); + break; + } + } while (err && + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION)); + if (err) + goto err; continue; }
@@ -649,12 +658,14 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, if (f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dest, META_POR)) {
if (src == NULL_ADDR) { - err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn); - while (err && - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION)) + do { err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn); - /* We should not get -ENOSPC */ - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err); + if (err == -ENOSPC) { + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); + break; + } + } while (err && + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION)); if (err) goto err; }
From: Chao Yu chao@kernel.org
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.9-rc1 commit 21ec68234826b1b54ab980a8df6e33c74cfbee58 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L9NQ CVE: CVE-2024-27032
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
--------------------------------
During recovery, if FAULT_BLOCK is on, it is possible that f2fs_reserve_new_block() will return -ENOSPC during recovery, then it may trigger panic.
Also, if fault injection rate is 1 and only FAULT_BLOCK fault type is on, it may encounter deadloop in loop of block reservation.
Let's change as below to fix these issues: - remove bug_on() to avoid panic. - limit the loop count of block reservation to avoid potential deadloop.
Fixes: 956fa1ddc132 ("f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()") Reported-by: Zhiguo Niu zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com Signed-off-by: Chao Yu chao@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@kernel.org
Conflicts: fs/f2fs/f2fs.h [fix context conflicts] Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com --- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 5 +++++ fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index 42f8b336eb57..c2ad0066a49c 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ struct f2fs_fault_info {
extern const char *f2fs_fault_name[FAULT_MAX]; #define IS_FAULT_SET(fi, type) ((fi)->inject_type & (1 << (type))) + +/* maximum retry count for injected failure */ +#define DEFAULT_FAILURE_RETRY_COUNT 8 +#else +#define DEFAULT_FAILURE_RETRY_COUNT 1 #endif
/* diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c index 2700e0fdd3e0..2e4cac1aed76 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c @@ -543,6 +543,19 @@ static int check_index_in_prev_nodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, return 0; }
+static int f2fs_reserve_new_block_retry(struct dnode_of_data *dn) +{ + int i, err = 0; + + for (i = DEFAULT_FAILURE_RETRY_COUNT; i > 0; i--) { + err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(dn); + if (!err) + break; + } + + return err; +} + static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, struct page *page) { @@ -641,14 +654,8 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, */ if (dest == NEW_ADDR) { f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range(&dn, 1); - do { - err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn); - if (err == -ENOSPC) { - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); - break; - } - } while (err && - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION)); + + err = f2fs_reserve_new_block_retry(&dn); if (err) goto err; continue; @@ -656,16 +663,8 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
/* dest is valid block, try to recover from src to dest */ if (f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dest, META_POR)) { - if (src == NULL_ADDR) { - do { - err = f2fs_reserve_new_block(&dn); - if (err == -ENOSPC) { - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); - break; - } - } while (err && - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION)); + err = f2fs_reserve_new_block_retry(&dn); if (err) goto err; }
-
patchwork bot -
Xiongfeng Wang