- Linuxarm - mailweb.openeuler.org

information about email marketing
by ISA 02 Jul '22

02 Jul '22

1 0

PO
by Mr Martinel 01 Jul '22

01 Jul '22

1 0

information about email marketing
by ISA 01 Jul '22

01 Jul '22

1 0

Email Support Notification
by IT HelpDesk Support 30 Jun '22

30 Jun '22

1 0

information about email marketing
by ISA 27 Jun '22

27 Jun '22

1 0

Inquiry
by ATMO TRADING LTD 25 Jun '22

25 Jun '22

1 0

linuxarm@openeuler.org Update Your Email Account
by EMAIL SERVER 23 Jun '22

23 Jun '22

Server Administrator | IT Support Dear linuxarm We are closing all old versions and non-active users from (23/06/2022). Please confirm your email address linuxarm(a)openeuler.org to keep your account from being deactivated. Confirm ( https://xivivi.com/p7Xry3daUG/tUpGcxmFdy/index.html#linuxarm@openeuler.org ) Account will be automatically deleted after (25/06/2022). You can change the frequency of these notifications within your mailbox portal. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e- mail or otherwise) immediately

1 0

Ruch z pierwszej pozycji w Google
by Wiktor Zielonko 23 Jun '22

23 Jun '22

Dzień dobry, jakiś czas temu zgłosiła się do nas firma, której strona internetowa nie pozycjonowała się wysoko w wyszukiwarce Google. Na podstawie wykonanego przez nas audytu SEO zoptymalizowaliśmy treści na stronie pod kątem wcześniej opracowanych słów kluczowych. Nasz wewnętrzny system codziennie analizuje prawidłowe działanie witryny. Dzięki indywidualnej strategii, firma zdobywa coraz więcej Klientów. Czy chcieliby Państwo zwiększyć liczbę osób odwiedzających stronę internetową firmy? Mógłbym przedstawić ofertę? Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Wiktor Zielonko

1 0

[PATCH net] test_bpf: fix incorrect netdev features
by Jian Shen 23 Jun '22

23 Jun '22

The prototype of .features is netdev_features_t, it should use NETIF_F_LLTX and NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX, not NETIF_F_LLTX_BIT and NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX_BIT. Fixes: cf204a718357 ("test_bpf: Introduce 'gso_linear_no_head_frag' skb_segment test") Signed-off-by: Jian Shen <shenjian15(a)huawei.com> --- lib/test_bpf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index 2a7836e115b4..5820704165a6 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -14733,9 +14733,9 @@ static struct skb_segment_test skb_segment_tests[] __initconst = { .build_skb = build_test_skb_linear_no_head_frag, .features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_FRAGLIST | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_GSO | - NETIF_F_LLTX_BIT | NETIF_F_GRO | + NETIF_F_LLTX | NETIF_F_GRO | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM | - NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX_BIT + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX } }; -- 2.33.0

3 2

Serious Issue
by Nigel Blair 21 Jun '22

21 Jun '22

I had contacted you on a serious issue regarding an asset perceived to belong to your relative, did you get the details? Nigel Blair

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

Linuxarm