On Saturday, March 27, 2021, Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> wrote:
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including
following types:

WARNING: simple_strtol is obsolete, use kstrtol instead
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations


First of all, two changes ==> two patches. 
 

Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
index be73974..2df231e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static void byt_i2c_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata)

        /* Expected to always be true, but better safe then sorry */
        if (uid_str)
-               uid = simple_strtol(uid_str, NULL, 10);
+               uid = kstrtol(uid_str, NULL, 10);


How did you test this? Is there any guarantee that input is null-terminated number? 

Where is the check of returned value from `kstrtol()`?
 
Yes, you haven’t tested that at all. Don’t submit patches you are not able to test and haven’t tested.

NAK.
 
        /* Detect I2C bus shared with PUNIT and ignore its d3 status */
        status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SEM", NULL, &shared_host);
@@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_lpss_device_ids[] = {
 static int is_memory(struct acpi_resource *res, void *not_used)
 {
        struct resource r;
+
        return !acpi_dev_resource_memory(res, &r);
 }

@@ -1200,6 +1201,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_poweroff_noirq(struct device *dev)
        if (pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq) {
                /* This is analogous to the acpi_lpss_suspend_noirq() case. */
                int ret = acpi_lpss_do_poweroff_late(dev);
+
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
        }
--
2.8.1



--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko