Hi Jiri,
On 2021/4/7 13:26, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 06. 04. 21, 13:24, Xiaofei Tan wrote:
Fix coding style issues of block comments, reported by checkpatch.pl. Besides, do some expression optimization for the sentenses.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com
drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c index 86070f7..7003b6b 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c @@ -204,8 +204,10 @@ int tty_signal_session_leader(struct tty_struct *tty, int exit_session) spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock); if (p->signal->tty == tty) { p->signal->tty = NULL;
/* We defer the dereferences outside fo
the tasklist lock */
/*
* We defer the dereferences outside of
* the tasklist lock period
:). No, I meant "period" as this punctuation mark: .
Oh, my misunderstanding. I will send v3 later. thanks. :)
*/ refs++; } if (!p->signal->leader) {
@@ -328,9 +330,11 @@ void disassociate_ctty(int on_exit) */ void no_tty(void) {
- /* FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possible we need
to protect against this anyway */
- /*
* FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
* between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possibly we need
* to protect against this period anyway
The same here.
Sure
*/ struct task_struct *tsk = current; disassociate_ctty(0);
@@ -536,7 +540,7 @@ static int tiocgsid(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *real_tty, pid_t _ /* * (tty == real_tty) is a cheap way of * testing if the tty is NOT a master pty.
- */
*/ if (tty == real_tty && current->signal->tty != real_tty) return -ENOTTY;