HIP09 supports UD inline up to size of 1024 Bytes, the caps flag is got from firmware and passed back to userspace when creating QP.
Signed-off-by: Weihang Li liweihang@huawei.com --- Changes since v1: - Avoid overwriting some fields in set_default_caps(). - Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/patch/1609810615-50515-1-git...
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 1 + drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 18 +++++++++++------- drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.h | 1 + drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c | 3 +++ include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h index 55d5386..87716da 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ enum { HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_FRMR = BIT(8), HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_QP_FLOW_CTRL = BIT(9), HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_ATOMIC = BIT(10), + HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_UD_SQ_INL = BIT(13), HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_SDI_MODE = BIT(14), HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_STASH = BIT(17), }; diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c index 833e1f2..1454cd9 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c @@ -1800,7 +1800,6 @@ static void set_default_caps(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev) caps->max_sq_sg = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_SGE_NUM; caps->max_extend_sg = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_EXTEND_SGE_NUM; caps->max_rq_sg = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_RQ_SGE_NUM; - caps->max_sq_inline = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_INLINE; caps->num_uars = HNS_ROCE_V2_UAR_NUM; caps->phy_num_uars = HNS_ROCE_V2_PHY_UAR_NUM; caps->num_aeq_vectors = HNS_ROCE_V2_AEQE_VEC_NUM; @@ -1817,7 +1816,6 @@ static void set_default_caps(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev) caps->max_sq_desc_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_DESC_SZ; caps->max_rq_desc_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_RQ_DESC_SZ; caps->max_srq_desc_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SRQ_DESC_SZ; - caps->qpc_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_QPC_SZ; caps->irrl_entry_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_IRRL_ENTRY_SZ; caps->trrl_entry_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_EXT_ATOMIC_TRRL_ENTRY_SZ; caps->cqc_entry_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_CQC_ENTRY_SZ; @@ -1825,7 +1823,6 @@ static void set_default_caps(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev) caps->mtpt_entry_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_MTPT_ENTRY_SZ; caps->mtt_entry_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_MTT_ENTRY_SZ; caps->idx_entry_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_IDX_ENTRY_SZ; - caps->cqe_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_CQE_SIZE; caps->page_size_cap = HNS_ROCE_V2_PAGE_SIZE_SUPPORTED; caps->reserved_lkey = 0; caps->reserved_pds = 0; @@ -1871,11 +1868,8 @@ static void set_default_caps(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev) HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_SQ_RECORD_DB;
caps->pkey_table_len[0] = 1; - caps->gid_table_len[0] = HNS_ROCE_V2_GID_INDEX_NUM; caps->ceqe_depth = HNS_ROCE_V2_COMP_EQE_NUM; caps->aeqe_depth = HNS_ROCE_V2_ASYNC_EQE_NUM; - caps->aeqe_size = HNS_ROCE_AEQE_SIZE; - caps->ceqe_size = HNS_ROCE_CEQE_SIZE; caps->local_ca_ack_delay = 0; caps->max_mtu = IB_MTU_4096;
@@ -1897,7 +1891,6 @@ static void set_default_caps(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev) caps->cqc_timer_buf_pg_sz = 0; caps->cqc_timer_hop_num = HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0;
- caps->sccc_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_SCCC_SZ; caps->sccc_ba_pg_sz = 0; caps->sccc_buf_pg_sz = 0; caps->sccc_hop_num = HNS_ROCE_SCCC_HOP_NUM; @@ -1916,6 +1909,16 @@ static void set_default_caps(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev) caps->gmv_buf_pg_sz = 0; caps->gid_table_len[0] = caps->gmv_bt_num * (HNS_HW_PAGE_SIZE / caps->gmv_entry_sz); + caps->flags |= HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_UD_SQ_INL; + caps->max_sq_inline = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_INL_EXT; + } else { + caps->aeqe_size = HNS_ROCE_AEQE_SIZE; + caps->ceqe_size = HNS_ROCE_CEQE_SIZE; + caps->cqe_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_CQE_SIZE; + caps->qpc_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_QPC_SZ; + caps->sccc_sz = HNS_ROCE_V2_SCCC_SZ; + caps->gid_table_len[0] = HNS_ROCE_V2_GID_INDEX_NUM; + caps->max_sq_inline = HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_INLINE; } }
@@ -5084,6 +5087,7 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_query_qp(struct ib_qp *ibqp, struct ib_qp_attr *qp_attr, qp_attr->cur_qp_state = qp_attr->qp_state; qp_attr->cap.max_recv_wr = hr_qp->rq.wqe_cnt; qp_attr->cap.max_recv_sge = hr_qp->rq.max_gs; + qp_attr->cap.max_inline_data = hr_qp->max_inline_data;
if (!ibqp->uobject) { qp_attr->cap.max_send_wr = hr_qp->sq.wqe_cnt; diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.h index bdaccf8..ab685a4 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.h +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.h @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ #define HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_SGE_NUM 64 #define HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_EXTEND_SGE_NUM 0x200000 #define HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_INLINE 0x20 +#define HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_SQ_INL_EXT 0x400 #define HNS_ROCE_V2_MAX_RC_INL_INN_SZ 32 #define HNS_ROCE_V2_UAR_NUM 256 #define HNS_ROCE_V2_PHY_UAR_NUM 1 diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c index d8e2fe5..b19fcbd 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c @@ -1020,6 +1020,9 @@ static int hns_roce_create_qp_common(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, }
if (udata) { + if (hr_dev->caps.flags & HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_UD_SQ_INL) + resp.cap_flags |= HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_UD_SQ_INL; + ret = ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &resp, min(udata->outlen, sizeof(resp))); if (ret) { diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h index 90b739d..79dba94 100644 --- a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ enum hns_roce_qp_cap_flags { HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_RQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 0, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_SQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 1, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_OWNER_DB = 1 << 2, + HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_UD_SQ_INL = 1 << 3, };
struct hns_roce_ib_create_qp_resp {
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:47:03PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h index 90b739d..79dba94 100644 +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ enum hns_roce_qp_cap_flags { HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_RQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 0, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_SQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 1, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_OWNER_DB = 1 << 2,
- HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_UD_SQ_INL = 1 << 3,
};
Where are the rdma-core patches to support this bit? I don't see them on github?
Jason
On 2021/1/19 4:09, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:47:03PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h index 90b739d..79dba94 100644 +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ enum hns_roce_qp_cap_flags { HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_RQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 0, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_SQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 1, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_OWNER_DB = 1 << 2,
- HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_UD_SQ_INL = 1 << 3,
};
Where are the rdma-core patches to support this bit? I don't see them on github?
Jason
I thought we needed to send the userspace part after the kernel part was merged. I sent the rdma-core patches just now:
https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/934
Thank you Weihang
Linuxarm mailing list -- linuxarm@openeuler.org To unsubscribe send an email to linuxarm-leave@openeuler.org
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:53:40AM +0000, liweihang wrote:
On 2021/1/19 4:09, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:47:03PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h index 90b739d..79dba94 100644 +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ enum hns_roce_qp_cap_flags { HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_RQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 0, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_SQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 1, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_OWNER_DB = 1 << 2,
- HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_UD_SQ_INL = 1 << 3,
};
Where are the rdma-core patches to support this bit? I don't see them on github?
Jason
I thought we needed to send the userspace part after the kernel part was merged. I sent the rdma-core patches just now:
After kernel part will be accessed, you will need to update the patch https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/934/commits/2877713e1fed29305d0... with the correct SHA-1.
Thanks
Thank you Weihang
Linuxarm mailing list -- linuxarm@openeuler.org To unsubscribe send an email to linuxarm-leave@openeuler.org
On 2021/1/19 14:27, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:53:40AM +0000, liweihang wrote:
On 2021/1/19 4:09, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:47:03PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h index 90b739d..79dba94 100644 +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ enum hns_roce_qp_cap_flags { HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_RQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 0, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_SQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 1, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_OWNER_DB = 1 << 2,
- HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_UD_SQ_INL = 1 << 3,
};
Where are the rdma-core patches to support this bit? I don't see them on github?
Jason
I thought we needed to send the userspace part after the kernel part was merged. I sent the rdma-core patches just now:
After kernel part will be accessed, you will need to update the patch https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/934/commits/2877713e1fed29305d0... with the correct SHA-1.
Thanks
OK, I will update it then.
Thanks Weihang
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:47:03PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h index 90b739d..79dba94 100644 +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ enum hns_roce_qp_cap_flags { HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_RQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 0, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_SQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 1, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_OWNER_DB = 1 << 2,
- HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_UD_SQ_INL = 1 << 3,
I don't understand why you need this flag.
The # of bytes of inline data should be returned from create_qp in the max_inline_data cap.
If things doesn't support inline data then shouldn't that just return 0?
Jason
On 2021/1/22 1:52, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:47:03PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h index 90b739d..79dba94 100644 +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ enum hns_roce_qp_cap_flags { HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_RQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 0, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_SQ_RECORD_DB = 1 << 1, HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_OWNER_DB = 1 << 2,
- HNS_ROCE_QP_CAP_UD_SQ_INL = 1 << 3,
I don't understand why you need this flag.
The # of bytes of inline data should be returned from create_qp in the max_inline_data cap.
If things doesn't support inline data then shouldn't that just return 0?
Jason
Yes, you are right. Please ignore this patch and I will update the userspace part later.
Thanks Weihang